Final Words

The ASRock Beebox N3000-NUC provided us with the opportunity to evaluate Braswell in a non-mobile form factor. We have already looked at the performance of Intel's Airmont in the Microsoft Surface 3. However, that was in a much more thermally limited configuration. The Beebox is also the first UCFF PC sporting Cherry Trail, and it shows what can be done with power-efficient 14nm SoC in the NUC form factor without active cooling. The fanless aspects make the Beebox suitable for a wide variety of applications including embedded and industrial uses. The surprising aspect is the use of industrial-grade DRAM and SSD modules despite the $220 price point.

ASRock manages to cram in plenty of features in the small chassis - a USB Type-C port in the front panel, two full-sized HDMI ports and one full-sized Display Port outputs in the rear along with the usual NUC ports - three USB 3.0 and one GbE LAN slot. There is also an IR receiver (and a bundled mini-remote) for wireless control of media playback on the PC. The Beebox is also the smallest NUC that we have seen with support for a 2.5" drive. It is also the only NUC we are aware of with three simultaneous display outputs.

The thermal solution might not be the most elegant or efficient passive cooling setup. However, it gets the job done - the system doesn't throttle and temperatures are maintained well below the junction temperature even under stress. If this is what needs to be done to keep the costs of passively cooled systems down, we don't mind. Consumers looking for more powerful passively cooled systems can always go for the Core-series units from vendors such as Logic Supply.

Despite the above positive aspects, there is scope for improvement from both Intel and ASRock's perspective:

  • Intel needs to supply GPU drivers with HD audio bitstreaming (DTS-HD MA and Dolby TrueHD) enabled
  • Intel could have improved CPU performance a bit more when compared to Silvermont (particularly given the huge improvement in GPU performance)
  • ASRock's chassis design could do with some improvement - a metal chassis would probably bring down the idling temperature below 50 C. In the case that plastic is unavoidable due to cost issues, a perforated top similar to the Zotac ZBOX C-series units could help improve aesthetics.
  • ASRock is known for its premium mini-PCs, and it would have been interesting to see what they could have done with the Intel Core-M in a similar chassis.

The Beebox N3000-NUC series starts at $140, and a ready-to-go build without the OS is just $220. This is very good value for the money. In comparison to other fanless mini-PCs, there is almost no pricing premium. However, we get all the performance to power ratio advantages that come along with 14nm silicon. ASRock has also managed to put in plenty of premium features without driving up the price.

Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    "As FanlessTech notes, the thermal solution is very similar to that of the Zotac ZBOX C-series - a thermal pad on a small heat sink."

    No, here the chassis is connected to the heat sink with a thermal pad too, see at the TweakTown's teardown:
    http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/7224/asrock-beebo...

    "In the case that plastic is unavoidable due to cost issues, a perforated top similar to the Zotac ZBOX C-series units could help improve aesthetics."

    Aesthetics maybe, airflow sure.

    I still miss the HEVC test, I think it can make some sense under the 4K, without HDMI 2.0 too.
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Other suggestions for the ASRock from my side:
    - as the WiFi not so fast an external WiFi antenna connector will be useful for a DIY fix
    - a rechargable battery for the remote (built in charged via micro USB or AAA)
  • Earthfall - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    I didn't see a release date. When is this available?
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Approx mid of July for the non-OS versions (the one with memory and storage is already available here in Hungary from Friday), for the one with OS probably the end of the month, after the release of the Win 10.
  • harrkev - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    But, does it run BeOs? BeOs was designed to run on a BeBox.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeOS
  • extide - Wednesday, July 15, 2015 - link

    This is a BeeBox, not BeBox ;)
  • Stanand - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    How's the DisplayPort output? Should we assume that the DisplayPort will output 4K at 60fps? I'm actually pleasantly surprised to see DP on a cheap Braswell computer or motherboard.

    I know HDMI is the port of choice for HTPCs, but I'd like to know if I can play back 4K video at silky-smooth 60fps on one of those increasingly cheap 4K desktop displays.
  • Kobaljov - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Unfortunately no, check the other reviews on the web, it was tested somewhere and as far as I remember it was capable of only 4K/30 or less
  • Teknobug - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link

    4K 23fps probably.
  • MacDaddy100 - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    FIRST thing I thought, Is we'd finally see the ole Be.OS being put to use, Read the article, Noticed the name Bee, Not Be. Actually before OS X when Apple had considered the Be OS, I was stoked, But they went with the UNIX based Next Step, which in the long run turned out quite well, but part of me wanted Be.OS, why I was momentarily exited when I first seen the title of this article..... Dang.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now