Total War: Attila

The second strategy game in our benchmark suite, Total War: Attila is the latest game in the Total War franchise. Total War games have traditionally been a mix of CPU and GPU bottlenecks, so it takes a good system on both ends of the equation to do well here. In this case the game comes with a built-in benchmark that plays out over a large area with a fortress in the middle, making it a good GPU stress test.

Total War: Attila - 3840x2160 - Max Quality + Perf Shadows

Total War: Attila - 3840x2160 - Quality + Perf Shadows

Total War: Attila - 2560x1440 - Max Quality + Perf Shadows

With Attila the R9 Fury’s lead over the GTX 980 tapers some, but it’s still largely in AMD’s favor. The 13% lead at 1440p continues to be ahead of the 10% price premium, and on an absolute basis it’s enough to keep the R9 Fury over 40fps.

Meanwhile the R9 Fury yet again trails the R9 Fury X by 9-10%, just a bit over the overall average.

Far Cry 4 GRID Autosport
Comments Locked

288 Comments

View All Comments

  • mickulty - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    Looks fantastic! Definitely getting one of these once the stock is there.
  • FlushedBubblyJock - Wednesday, July 15, 2015 - link

    Yes paper launch for the r9 390X ... newegg is dry as a bone and just 15 reviews with zero stock only sapphire had about 10 cards to sell otherwise NO STOCK AT NEWEGG AT ALL.

    it's july 16th and the r9 390x is vapor
  • figus77 - Monday, July 20, 2015 - link

    Got a Sapphire Fury Tri-X (non OC version) the 16/7 in Italy... probably is newegg problem... and really is a good card, with catalyst 15.7 i got very nice results... With my system 8320, 16gb 1600hz, in Tomb Raider 2560x1440 all maxed out with TressFX on, FPS MIN: 58,0 - MED: 75,3 - MAX: 94,0
    Really good results. Witcher3 run stable beetween 45 to 50 fps in ultra setting in 2560x1440 and that casr is really silent you can't hear anything even after some long time playing.
  • Jtaylor1986 - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    Almost makes you wonder if AMD should have just designed the card with 54 compute units and would have had a winner on it's hand. Fury X seems to be somewhat unbalanced in terms of it's hardware configuration.
  • Asomething - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    This imbalance comes from gcn's limitations, amd tried to compensate with the extra shaders.
  • Ranger101 - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    Another quality Gpu review from Anandtech, in addition to being so early. Best of both worlds.
  • jann5s - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    The sapphire Tri-X cooling solutions performs impressively under load. I think this a consequence of the abysmal configuration forced on videocards by the ATX standard. The sapphire card can exhaust the hot air freely because of the short PCB, which proves we could use a replacement for ATX (or shorter PCB's)
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    It would be interesting to see the effect of having 2 or 3 cards in one system using that paradigm for sure.
  • jann5s - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    interesting for sure, any change sapphire will send another card?
  • jann5s - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    speaking of which, what happened to BTX?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now