Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs is a benchmarking wet dream – a highly complex benchmark that can bring the toughest setup and high resolutions down into single figures. Having an extreme SSAO setting can do that, but at the right settings Sleeping Dogs is highly playable and enjoyable. We run the basic benchmark program laid out in the Adrenaline benchmark tool, and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Sleeping Dogs: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Sleeping Dogs, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Company of Heroes 2

Company of Heroes 2 also can bring a top end GPU to its knees, even at very basic benchmark settings. To get an average 30 FPS using a normal GPU is a challenge, let alone a minimum frame rate of 30 FPS. For this benchmark I use modified versions of Ryan’s batch files at 1920x1080 on High. COH2 is a little odd in that it does not scale with more GPUs with the drivers we use.

Company Of Heroes 2: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Company of Heroes 2, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Battlefield 4

The EA/DICE series that has taken countless hours of my life away is back for another iteration, using the Frostbite 3 engine. AMD is also piling its resources into BF4 with the new Mantle API for developers, designed to cut the time required for the CPU to dispatch commands to the graphical sub-system. For our test we use the in-game benchmarking tools and record the frame time for the first ~70 seconds of the Tashgar single player mission, which is an on-rails generation of and rendering of objects and textures. We test at 1920x1080 at Ultra settings.

Battlefield 4: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Battlefield 4, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
99th Percentile Frame Rates

 

Gaming Benchmarks: F1 2013, Bioshock Infinite, Tomb Raider ASRock C2750D4I Conclusion
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • SallyannePaoloniuic - Saturday, May 10, 2014 - link

  • Snayperskaya - Monday, May 12, 2014 - link

    I know someone probably pointed this out, but running a default benchmark test against a system that is optimized to work on a dedicated role is a bit pointless. What about some data I/O tests on this one? I didn't see the test you guys take on HDDs/SSDs.
  • trampsvondepalz - Monday, May 12, 2014 - link

    I guess the main reason for this product launch is to attack the almost identically featured Supermicro Atom boards (like the A1SRi-2758F) at a somewhat lower pricepoint (which does not necessarily mean "cheap" ! ;-)

    Supermicro had almost no competitors in this very special segment before - or am I wrong there ?
    Let´s wait and see if reliability and software support catch up with the grandmaster of storage & Server boards ! :-)

    http://www.supermicro.nl/products/motherboard/Atom...
  • S.D.Leary - Tuesday, March 3, 2015 - link

    I may have missed it, but did Ganesh ever test this board?

    SDLeary
  • NilamBhate - Thursday, April 16, 2015 - link

    What is the 1U rack mount case - make and model you used here ?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now