Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite is Irrational Games’ latest entry in the Bioshock franchise. Though it’s based on Unreal Engine 3 – making it our obligatory UE3 game – Irrational had added a number of effects that make the game rather GPU-intensive on its highest settings. As an added bonus it includes a built-in benchmark composed of several scenes, a rarity for UE3 engine games, so we can easily get a good representation of what Bioshock’s performance is like.

Bioshock Infinite - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality + DDoF

Bioshock Infinite - 3840x2160 - Medium Quality

Bioshock Infinite - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality + DDoF

At Bioshock’s highest quality settings the game generally favors NVIDIA’s GPUs, particularly since NVIDIA’s most recent driver release. As a result we’ll see the 295X2 come up short of 60fps on Ultra quality at 2160p, and otherwise trail the GTX 780 Ti SLI at both 2160p and 1440p. However it’s interesting to note that at 2160p with Medium quality – a compromise setting mostly for testing single-GPU setups at this resolution – we see the 295X2 jump ahead of NVIDIA’s best, illustrating the fact that what’s ultimately dragging down AMD’s performance in this game is a greater degree of bottlenecking with Bioshock’s Ultra quality effects.

Bioshock Infinite - Delta Percentages

Bioshock Infinite - Surround/4K - Delta Percentages

Meanwhile our first set of frame pacing benchmarks has more or less set the stage. Thanks to its XDMA engine the 295X2 is able to deliver acceptable frame pacing performance at both 1440p and 2160p, though at 1440p in particular NVIDIA does technically fare better than AMD here. As for the Radeon HD 7990, this offers a solid example of how AMD’s older GCN 1.0 based dual-GPU card still has great difficulty with frame pacing at higher resolutions.

Company of Heroes 2 Battlefield 4
Comments Locked

131 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gizmosis350k - Sunday, May 4, 2014 - link

    A CPU block you mean?
  • C4$hFlo - Monday, May 12, 2014 - link

    Emphasis on "moderately good". Years of operation will require maintenance on any LC solution. Moderately priced solutions such as Thermaltake don't hold up as well, the liquid gets discolored, tubing cooks and becomes brittle, pumps fail etc... Liquid cooling isn't something to do on the cheap.
  • Saifur - Monday, December 8, 2014 - link

    Hello , can someone please advice , i have 4930 K , OC to 4.3 Ghz , 16 gig ram also OC ( slightly ) and i am planning on getting the r9 295x2 . Will the power supply i have be sufficient for this card ? This is my PSU - Cooler Master V850 - 850W . THanks
  • C4$hFlo - Monday, May 12, 2014 - link

    A pump, a reservoir, two waterblocks, a fan/pump controller and a plethora of connectors and tubing will probably end up costing the difference between an R9295X2 and two R290X water cooled. Remember, with the R9195X2 you get a free closed loop that requires no maintenance. After succesfully running dual HD6970s in a koolance loop for 3 years, I can say a free closed loop is a great selling point for me.
  • RoboJ1M - Friday, May 2, 2014 - link

    It'll be interesting when a card like this does not have 2xGPU + 2x4GB but 2xGPU + 8GB
    Eventually I guess we'll see the results of the HSA push trickle down (up?) to performance parts like this.
    Hey, maybe we'll see a 4xGPU + 16GB...
  • AMDisDead - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Almost faster than 780 Ti SLI and draws hundrets more W. AMD lunatics in full glory.
  • willis936 - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    A dual GPU is arguably worth the extra 100W compared to the drawbacks of SLI in pretty much every use case. The deciding factor is upfront cost.
  • Guspaz - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Dual GPU (from either company) has all the same limitations/drawbacks of SLI/Crossfire. It's literally the same thing.
  • lehtv - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    No, they don't have the same limitations. Since you don't have to populate two PCIe slots, you can install the 295X2 onto a microATX or ITX motherboard and case, or just use it in a regular ATX board that doesn't support x8/x8. For some, it could also matter to not have to populate a second PCIe slot and use additional PSU cables, even if their motherboard and PSU fully supported crossfire 290X. The ability to use only one PCIe slot has always been the primary selling point of any dual GPU card, ever.
  • Musaab - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    If you want to pay 1500 $ for video card and 2000+ for 4K monitor and 200+ for power supply then you are the one who pay 1500$ on core i 7 4960x with ROG X79. why should you think about 8x/8x motherboard lanes don't forget 32 GB 2400+ DDR 3 and two extra fast ssd . friend you needn't a case you need a cabinet

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now