The New Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) Review
by Joshua Ho on September 17, 2014 9:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Smartphones
- Motorola
- Android
- Mobile
Display
Without question, the display is one of the most important aspects of a smartphone. Unlike desktops and laptops, smartphones are primarily interacted with through their displays. Unfortunately, it’s hard to evaluate a display by eye as human vision is strongly dependent upon context. In order to control for this aspect, we turn to SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 with a custom workflow in order to test smartphone displays. At any rate, let’s get into the data.
In the basics, the new Moto X is a bit on the low side. While AMOLED has traditionally struggled with luminance in situations such as the web browser and light-themed applications, Samsung’s Galaxy S5 and S5 LTE-A Broadband have shown that it’s possible to achieve levels of brightness approaching some of the brightest RGB-stripe LCDs. As the brightness of the Lumia 930 is about equal to the new Moto X, I suspect we're looking at the Galaxy S4/Note 3 generation of panels. This seems to be backed up by pictures of the subpixel layout seen below as the green subpixels seem to be noticeably larger when compared to the Galaxy S5's panel.
Contrast is still incredible, but I can still see the purple smearing effect that comes from unlit to lit pixels. I’m still unable to get a clear answer on why this is, but it’s likely that capacitance somewhere in the system is causing this issue in the form of RC delay. Whether this is a fixable issue is something I’m not aware of yet. The clear solution would be to set black to the lowest possible brightness a lit pixel can be, but this would make for worse contrast.
In grayscale, the new Moto X isn’t the best. We see that the display is just a bit too red, and that most of the luminance is coming from red and green. This makes sense from a power and display lifetime perspective though, as blue tends to have the least efficient emitter material in an AMOLED display. However, this translates to poor grayscale performance. The green tint tends to show itself in certain shades of grayscale as well.
In our saturation sweep, the new Moto X continues to be rather poor in its performance. While on Samsung phones it’s normal to see colors like this on the default display mode, there’s usually a mode that correctly constrains the display to sRGB which is the industry standard for displaying colors. There’s no such mode on the new Moto X, so the display significantly overshoots sRGB. This doesn’t bode well for the ColorChecker, which provides the most thorough look at color accuracy.
As predicted, the new Moto X does poorly in the ColorChecker. There’s really not much that the Moto X can accurately display in sRGB as just by pushing the gamut too far, even if there wasn’t saturation compression for some colors, the large gamut will cause distortion of all colors within the gamut triangle.
Unfortunately, it’s not clear where this lack of attention to color accuracy comes from. In discussions with Andrei it's clearly possible to calibrate the AMOLED panel from the GS4 quite accurately, and there's no real technical limitation for AMOLED to lack good calibration. However, judging by the relatively low peak brightness there are other issues as this could affect Motorola's performance in battery life tests. This seems to suggest that Motorola is unable to access the latest generation of AMOLED panels from Samsung Display.
This would be a rather startling thought, as it means that no matter what Motorola does to improve their implementation of Samsung’s AMOLED displays, they will always be behind the curve. If it becomes clear that Samsung’s AMOLED is the best display from a user-facing standpoint, every other OEM will face significant barriers in competition as they would be unable to access the latest generation AMOLED panels. The real solution here is for other display manufacturers such as LG, JDI, and AUO Optronics to catch up.
At any rate, the display of the new Moto X seems to be relatively poor compared to what we see in the Galaxy S5 LTE-A (and likely the Note 4), along with the iPhone 5s, Nexus 5, and One (M7). While it’s impossible to ignore the power advantage of AMOLED when implementing functions like Moto Display, the relatively low peak brightness and poor color accuracy are concerning.
179 Comments
View All Comments
mikelward - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
Wow, well spotted.Yet another disappointment.
Gunbuster - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
Perhaps there will be a T-Mo specific version? Still that segments it and killls the chances for finding a hot deal.I just wish there was an option to do WiFi calling on non T-Mo branded handsets...
jk1 - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
can't change the battery and poor battery life, no slot for an sd card for media - this phone doesn't even make my list of phones to consider.rocketbuddha - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
Yeah. Very disappointing. They seemed to willingly snatched Defeat from the jaws of Victory.No SD card expandability
Piss poor battery
No T-Mo LTE bands
Moto's ideal market would be ideally a no-contract carrier likeT-Mo or any of the MVNOs.
rocketbuddha - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
Wierd.Based on the table infor provided FCC-ID =IHDT56QA1, it has support for
WCDMA in AWS [850, 900, AWS, 1900, 2100]
as well as Band 4 LTE. [2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17, 29]
Those are TMO US bands. So what prevents us from using the phone on TMobile??
greyhulk - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
A little off-topic, but does anyone know what happened to Brian Klug? Does he do anything for Anandtech anymore?notposting - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
He went to Apple.bigboxes - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
It sounds like the commercial, "He went to Jarrod's!" But yes, Brian and Anand went to work for Apple.fokka - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
and they didn't mention it even once, not even in his long and heartfelt goodbye letter did anand say what is what.Xinn3r - Wednesday, September 17, 2014 - link
AFAIK only Anand went to Apple.Brian is continuing Grad study, this is from what I've read on other comments.