Gaming Tests: F1 2019

The F1 racing games from Codemasters have been popular benchmarks in the tech community, mostly for ease-of-use and that they seem to take advantage of any area of a machine that might be better than another. The 2019 edition of the game features all 21 circuits on the calendar for that year, and includes a range of retro models and DLC focusing on the careers of Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna. Built on the EGO Engine 3.0, the game has been criticized similarly to most annual sports games, by not offering enough season-to-season graphical fidelity updates to make investing in the latest title worth it, however the 2019 edition revamps up the Career mode, with features such as in-season driver swaps coming into the mix. The quality of the graphics this time around is also superb, even at 4K low or 1080p Ultra.

For our test, we put Alex Albon in the Red Bull in position #20, for a dry two-lap race around Austin. We test at the following settings:

  • 768p Ultra Low, 1440p Ultra Low, 4K Ultra Low, 1080p Ultra

In terms of automation, F1 2019 has an in-game benchmark that can be called from the command line, and the output file has frame times. We repeat each resolution setting for a minimum of 10 minutes, taking the averages and percentiles.

AnandTech Low Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Low Quality
High Resolution
Low Quality
Medium Resolution
Max Quality
Average FPS
95th Percentile

 

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Gaming Tests: Borderlands 3 Gaming Tests: Far Cry 5
Comments Locked

339 Comments

View All Comments

  • Threska - Monday, November 16, 2020 - link

    Depends upon advantage.

    https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/11/16/nvidia-l...
  • FreckledTrout - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    AMD finally has an Intel beater on its hands at least until Rocket Lake arrives. Having actual competition is going to be great computing. Nice review.
  • duploxxx - Saturday, November 7, 2020 - link

    nothing confirmed on Rocket Lake...

    fishy results with a so-called avg turbo ghz which actually shows it was doing 5ghz.
    a total unknown release date, expected at the end of Q1 2021 on a dead platform with some kind of pcie-4 . yeah really looking forward.
  • Spunjji - Sunday, November 8, 2020 - link

    They'd have to get north of 5.3Ghz consistently to beat AMD.

    I just don't think they can, which would make the product pretty hilarious - big die, lots of heat, no performance crown.
  • hbsource - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Very impressive. I think I'm good with my 3950X until the next socket but the single thread uplift is very tempting.
  • FireSnake - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    @Ian:
    "With AMD taking the performance crown in almost area it’s competing in"
    Should this be:
    "With AMD taking the performance crown in almost every area it’s competing in" ... missing every?
  • charlesg - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Now to just find the 5950 in stock at NewEgg!
  • faizoff - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Quick question on encoding with Handbrake, the 4k encoding and even the others for that matter, what preset are they run? like fast, medium, slow? and what RF count are the encodes set to? Sorry if I missed those, don't see them at a glance. Amazing review as always. Best tech deep dive for me, I love to read the architectural breakdown.
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, November 9, 2020 - link

    I think AT is using Handbrake's presets: (a) Discord Nitro 480p30, (b) Vimeo YouTube 720p30, and (c) HEVC 2160p60. I went through them now and here are the settings:

    A) Medium, CRF = 21
    B) Medium, CRF = 22
    C) Slow, CRF = 24

    If you were looking for the reference frames, they are 3, 1, and 4. And there's a possibility Anandtech might have altered the presets.
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, November 5, 2020 - link

    Does Purch require you to use at least one bad pun in every article?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now