CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We put the memory settings at the CPU manufacturers suggested frequency, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Rendering - Blender 2.7b: 3D Creation Suite - link

A high profile rendering tool, Blender is open-source allowing for massive amounts of configurability, and is used by a number of high-profile animation studios worldwide. The organization recently released a Blender benchmark package, a couple of weeks after we had narrowed our Blender test for our new suite, however their test can take over an hour. For our results, we run one of the sub-tests in that suite through the command line - a standard ‘bmw27’ scene in CPU only mode, and measure the time to complete the render.

Rendering: Blender 2.79b

Streaming and Archival Video Transcoding - Handbrake 1.1.0

A popular open source tool, Handbrake is the anything-to-anything video conversion software that a number of people use as a reference point. The danger is always on version numbers and optimization, for example the latest versions of the software can take advantage of AVX-512 and OpenCL to accelerate certain types of transcoding and algorithms. The version we use here is a pure CPU play, with common transcoding variations.

We have split Handbrake up into several tests, using a Logitech C920 1080p60 native webcam recording (essentially a streamer recording), and convert them into two types of streaming formats and one for archival. The output settings used are:

  • 720p60 at 6000 kbps constant bit rate, fast setting, high profile
  • 1080p60 at 3500 kbps constant bit rate, faster setting, main profile
  • 1080p60 HEVC at 3500 kbps variable bit rate, fast setting, main profile

Handbrake 1.1.0 - 720p60 x264 6000 kbps FastHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 x264 3500 kbps FasterHandbrake 1.1.0 - 1080p60 HEVC 3500 kbps Fast

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7.1: Ray Tracing - link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7.1 Benchmark

Compression – WinRAR 5.60b3: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.60b3

Synthetic – 7-Zip v1805: link

Out of our compression/decompression tool tests, 7-zip is the most requested and comes with a built-in benchmark. For our test suite, we’ve pulled the latest version of the software and we run the benchmark from the command line, reporting the compression, decompression, and a combined score.

It is noted in this benchmark that the latest multi-die processors have very bi-modal performance between compression and decompression, performing well in one and badly in the other. There are also discussions around how the Windows Scheduler is implementing every thread. As we get more results, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Encoding: 7-Zip 1805 CompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 DecompressionEncoding: 7-Zip 1805 Combined

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady-state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • Korguz - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    TheinsanegamerN the same could be said about some of intels pricing, but people still bought/buy those cpu's, what's your point ?
  • eek2121 - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    Worthless? Hardly. The target audience is someone like me.

    A bit off-topic: AnandTech needs to update their GPU before they become the most 'worthless' site when it comes to reviews. The gaming benchmarks ARE worthless because the majority of the games tested are GPU bound on the 1080. It's time to make a jump to a 2080ti. For example, on my Linux Threadripper based system, I get a significantly better framerate from GTAV on my Threadripper 1950X AT 4K (!!!) with only a slightly better GPU. This is at stock settings. Every single game that AnandTech tests, I get significantly better performance (nearly twice the FPS in most cases) just by having a better GPU...and I'm on a Zen 1 based system vs. Zen 2.

    I'm usually defensive of AnandTech, however it's time for change.
  • Silma - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    Absolutely agree with you.
    This board really is aiming at a clientele who wouldn't know how to better spend or donate a thousand bucks.
  • Vatharian - Friday, December 20, 2019 - link

    Board itself is reasonably well equipped. Computer does not end on motherboard and CPU, it's currently the only board offering 10G Base-T, TB3 and WF6, except for X570 Creator, also from ASRock, and it costs exactly half - $500. For the 'worth' of board, look there. Would you pay $500 for monoblock? I would if I had maxed out other components and still cash left. It's convenient, actually, and every single monoblock-equipped board I have, is still working, thanks to always cool components. And $500 for full-board monoblock isn't outrageous, it would be more expensive to manufacture it by yourself.

    Now, if you don't see any point, then it's just not the product for you, and again, look at the Creator board.

    It's the same as full diy liquid cooling loop. Does it provide any extra performance over AIO? Barely, if any. Is it worth it given exorbitant costs? No. Will people continue making them? Yes.

    I have pimped out dual-cpu computer, with water cooled ram, vrms, chipset, both CPUs, gpus, 100G network card and fpga card, just because I simply wanted to. There is no benefit to it (and lots of hassle, as when I'll swap something it will be royal pita), but I still did it, just for the joy of it.
  • joesiv - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    pinched inlet hose?
  • Stuka87 - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    Optical illusion caused by the square edge of the aluminum block. I thought the same thing at a quick glance.
  • dcianf - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    Users that mix this with other high performance watercooling components are in for a nasty surprise: this monoblock is aluminum while most other equipment (save for EK Fluid Gaming Aluminum kits) is copper or nickel. Aluminum is very galvanically active and would corrode in a mixed loop.
  • Stuka87 - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    I didn't see any mention of it, but the aluminum inside the cooler looks like it has been plated. If thats the case, compatibility would not be an issue.
  • smarmy - Thursday, December 19, 2019 - link

    The X570 AQUA is the only completely water-cooled X570 motherboard – its unique all-copper cooling block covers the CPU, VRM and X570 Chipset to provide unbelievable performance and stability
  • GreenReaper - Saturday, December 21, 2019 - link

    Thank you, Mr. Bot, for that marketing spiel.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now