Civilization: Beyond Earth

Shifting gears from action to strategy, we have Civilization: Beyond Earth, the latest in the Civilization series of strategy games. Civilization is not quite as GPU-demanding as some of our action games, but at Ultra quality it can still pose a challenge for even high-end video cards. Meanwhile as the first Mantle-enabled strategy title Civilization gives us an interesting look into low-level API performance on larger scale games, along with a look at developer Firaxis’s interesting use of split frame rendering with Mantle to reduce latency rather than improving framerates.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

As one of the few games that can hit 60fps on the R9 Fury at 4K with everything turned up, it’s interesting to see how resolution impacts all of our cards with Civilization. At 4K the R9 Fury is well ahead of the GTX 980, surpassing it by 17%. Yet at 1440p that lead becomes a very slight loss, with the Sapphire Tri-X R9 Fury’s mild factory overclock giving it just enough of a boost to stay ahead of the GTX 980.

Meanwhile the Fury/Fury X gap widens ever so slightly here. The R9 Fury is now a full 10% behind the full-fledged Fury.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

The minimum framerate situation for Civilization is very nearly a mirror of the averages. The R9 Fury does relatively well at 4K, but at 1440p it’s now neck-and-neck with the GTX 980 once again.

Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor Dragon Age: Inquisition
Comments Locked

288 Comments

View All Comments

  • Midwayman - Friday, July 10, 2015 - link

    I'd love to see these two go at it again once dx12 games start showing up.
  • Mugur - Saturday, July 11, 2015 - link

    Bingo... :-). I bet the whole Fury lineup will gain a lot with DX12, especially the X2 part (4 + 4 GB won't equal 4 as in current CF). The are clearly CPU limited at this point.
  • squngy - Saturday, July 11, 2015 - link

    I don't know...

    Getting dx12 performance at the cost of dx11 performance sounds like a stupid idea this soon before dx12 games even come out.

    By the time a good amount of dx12 games come out there will probably be new graphics cards available.
  • thomascheng - Saturday, July 11, 2015 - link

    They will probably circle around and optimize things for 1080p and dx11, once dx12 and 4k is at a good place.
  • akamateau - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    DX12 games are out now. DX12 does not degrade DX11 performance. In fact Radeon 290x is 33% faster than 980 Ti in DX12. Fury X just CRUSHES ALL nVIDIA silicon with DX12 and there is a reason for it.

    Dx11 can ONLY feed data to the GPU serially and sequencially. Dx12 can feed data Asynchronously, the CPU send the data down the shader pipeline WHEN it is processed. Only AMD has this IP.
  • @DoUL - Sunday, July 19, 2015 - link

    Kindly provide link to a single DX12 game that is "out now".

    In every single review of the GTX 980 Ti there is this slide of DX12 feature set that the GTX 980 Ti supports and in that slide in all the reviews "Async Compute" is right there setting in the open, so I'm not really sure what do you mean by "Only AMD has this IP"!

    I'd strongly recommend that you hold your horses till DX12 games starts to roll out, and even then, don't forget the rocky start of DX11 titles!

    Regarding the comparison you're referring to, that guy is known for his obsession with mathematical calculations and synthetic benchmarking, given the differences between real-world applications and numbers based on mathematical calculations, you shouldn't be using/taking his numbers as a factual baseline for what to come.
  • @DoUL - Sunday, July 19, 2015 - link

    My Comment was intended as a reply to @akanateau
  • OldSchoolKiller1977 - Sunday, July 26, 2015 - link

    You are an idiotic person, wishful think and dreams don't make you correct. As stated please provide a link to these so called DX12 games and your wonderful "Fury X just CRUCHES ALL NVidia" statement.
  • Michael Bay - Sunday, July 12, 2015 - link

    As long as there is separate RAM in PCs, memory argument is moot, as contents are still copied and executed on in two places.
  • akamateau - Tuesday, July 14, 2015 - link

    Negative. Once Graphic data is processed and sent to the shaders it next goes to VRAM or video ram.

    System ram is what the CPU uses to process object draws. Once the objects are in the GPU pipes system ram is irrelevant.

    IN fact that is one of AMD's stacked memory patents. AMD will be putting HBM on APU's to not only act as CPU cache but HBM video ram as well. They have patents for programmable HBM using FPGA's and reconfigurable cache memory HBM as well.

    Stacked memory HBM can also be on the cpu package as a replacement for system ram. Can you imagine how your system would fly with 8-16gb of HBM instead of system ram?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now