Civilization: Beyond Earth

Shifting gears from action to strategy, we have Civilization: Beyond Earth, the latest in the Civilization series of strategy games. Civilization is not quite as GPU-demanding as some of our action games, but at Ultra quality it can still pose a challenge for even high-end video cards. Meanwhile as the first Mantle-enabled strategy title Civilization gives us an interesting look into low-level API performance on larger scale games, along with a look at developer Firaxis’s interesting use of split frame rendering with Mantle to reduce latency rather than improving framerates.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Unlike Battlefield 4 where we needed to switch back to DirectX for performance reasons on the R9 Fury X, AMD’s latest card still holds up rather well on Mantle here, probably due to the fact that Civilization is a newer game. Though not drawn in this chart, what we find is that AMD loses a frame or two per second for running Mantle, but in return they see far, far better minimums (more on that later).

Overall then the R9 Fury X looks pretty good at 4K. Even at Ultra quality it can deliver a better than 60fps average and is within 2% of the GTX 980 Ti. On the other hand AMD struggles a bit more at 1440p, where the absolute framerate is still rather high, but relative to the GTX 980 Ti it’s now an 11% performance gap. This being a Mantle game, the fact that AMD does fall behind is a bit surprising, as at a high level they should be enjoying the CPU benefits of the low-level API. We’ll revisit 1440p performance a bit later on, but this is going to be a recurring quirk for AMD, and a detriment for 1440p 144Hz monitor owners.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

The bigger advantage of Mantle is really the minimum framerates, and here the R9 Fury X soars. At 4K the R9 Fury X delivers a minimum framerate of 50.5fps, some 20% better than the GTX 980 Ti. Both cards do well enough here, but it goes without saying that this is a very distinct difference, and one that is well in AMD’s favor. The only downside for AMD here is that they can’t keep this advantage at 1440p, where they go back to trailing the GTX 980 Ti in minimum framerates by 7%.

On that note I do have one concern here with AMD’s support plans for Mantle. Mainly I’m worried that as well as the R9 Fury X does here, there’s a risk Mantle may stop working in the future. The GCN 1.2 based R9 285 can’t use the Mantle path at all (it crashes), and the R9 Fury X is not all that different in architecture.

Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor Dragon Age: Inquisition
Comments Locked

458 Comments

View All Comments

  • chizow - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    While Intel wasn't the underdog in terms of marketshare, they were in terms of technology and performance with the Athlon 64 vs. Pentium 4. Intel had a dog on their hands that they managed to weather the storm with, until they got Conroe'd in 2006. Now, they are down and most likely out, as Zen even if it delivers as promised (40% IPC increase just isn't enough) will take years to gain traction in the CPU market. Time AMD simply does not have, especially given how far behind they've fallen in the dGPU market.
  • nikaldro - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    That's 40% over excavator, so about 60%? over vishera.
    If they manage to get good enough IPC on 8 cores, at a good price, they may really make a comeback
  • chizow - Monday, July 6, 2015 - link

    Well, best of luck with this. :)
  • bgo - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    Well during the P4 era Intel bribed OEMs to not use Athlon chips, which they later had to pay $1.25bn to AMD for. While one could argue the monetary losses may have been partially made up for, the settlement came at the end of 2009, so too little too late. Intel bought themselves time with their bribes, and that's what really enabled them to weather the storms.
  • chizow - Monday, July 6, 2015 - link

    No, if you read the actual results and AMD's own testimony, they couldn't produce enough chips and offer them at a low enough price to OEMs compared to what Intel was just giving away as subsidies.
  • piiman - Friday, July 3, 2015 - link

    " AMD got beat by the underdog. "

    And that makes them the underdog now.
  • boozed - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    "Mantle is essentially depreciated at this point"

    Deprecated, surely?
  • chrisgon - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    "Which is not say I’m looking to paint a poor picture of the company – AMD Is nothing if not the perineal underdog who constantly manages to surprise us with what they can do with less"

    I think the word you were looking for is perennial. Unless you truly meant to refer to AMD as the taint.
  • ArKritz - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    I think there's about a 50-50 chance of that...
  • ingwe - Thursday, July 2, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the effort that went into this article. I hope you are feeling better.

    In general this article makes me continue to feel sad for AMD.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now