The NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X Review
by Ryan Smith on March 17, 2015 3:00 PM ESTThe Talos Principle
Croteam’s first person puzzle and exploration game The Talos Principle may not involve much action, but the game’s lush environments still put even fast video cards to good use. Coupled with the use of 4x MSAA at Ultra quality, and even a tranquil puzzle game like Talos can make a good case for more powerful video cards.
At 4K Ultra quality the GTX Titan X won’t quite break 60fps, but at 53.4fps it’s not too far off. Compared to the GTX 980 this is another 35% performance advantage, though the lead over the GK110 cards is a bit smaller than normal at 40% and 47% for the GTX 780 Ti and GTX Titan respectively.
Meanwhile since I haven’t had a chance yet to address how GTX Titan X compares to NVIDIA’s flagship Fermi card, GTX 580, this is a good time. GTX 580 actually holds up decently here, delivering 32fps at 1440p, however GTX Titan X offers 3 times the performance, and more still in VRAM limited situations, showcasing how far ahead Big Maxwell is over Big Fermi over 4 years later.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
276 Comments
View All Comments
dragonsqrrl - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
Had no idea that non reference Hawaii cards were generally undervolted resulting in lower power consumption. Source?chizow - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
There is some science behind it, heat results in higher leakage resulting in higher power consumption. But yes I agree, the reviews show otherwise, in fact, they show the cards that dont' throttle and boost unabated draw even more power, closer to 300W. So yes, that increased perf comes at the expense of higher power consumption, not sure why the AMD faithful believe otherwise.FlushedBubblyJock - Saturday, March 21, 2015 - link
Duh. It's because they hate Physx.Kutark - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
Yes, some of the new designs from aftermarket are cooler and quiter, but they dont use less power, the GPU is generating the power, the aftermarket companies can't alter that. They can only tame the beast, so to speak.Yojimbo - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
Would be a good point if the performance were the same. But the Titan X is 50% faster. The scores are also total system power usage under gaming load, not card usage. Running at 50% faster frame rates is going to tax other parts of the system more, as well.Kutark - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
You're kidding right. Your framerate in no way affects your power usage.nevcairiel - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
Actually, it might. If the GPU is faster, it might need more CPU power, which in turn can increase power draw from the CPU.DarkXale - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
Of course. Its the entire point of DX12/Mantle/Vulcan/Metal to reduce per-frame CPU work, and as a consequence per-frame CPU power consumption.Yojimbo - Tuesday, March 17, 2015 - link
The main point of my post is that Titan X gets 50% more performance/system watt. But yes, your frame rate should affect your power usage if you are GPU-bound. The CPU, for instance, will be working harder maintaining the higher frame rates. How much harder, I have no idea, but it's a variable that needs to be considered before testbug00's antecedent can be considered true.dragonsqrrl - Wednesday, March 18, 2015 - link
Actually frame rates have a lot to do with power usage.I don't think that needs any further explanation, anyone who's even moderately informed knows this, and even if they didn't could probably figure out why this might be the case in about 10 seconds.