As an interesting dynamic to our testing, it has been requested that we see how well the C2750 does in our discrete GPU benchmarks. The combination of a slower CPU and limited PCIe bandwidth will be the major culprit in almost all our benchmarks, although Tomb Raider is at least on an even keel. Most of our benchmarks show a 30+ FPS frame rate, if you are willing to pair a large GPU with the C2750D4I.  Again, we are currently testing other 25W platforms to provide more applicable competition for this platform.

F1 2013

First up is F1 2013 by Codemasters. I am a big Formula 1 fan in my spare time, and nothing makes me happier than carving up the field in a Caterham, waving to the Red Bulls as I drive by (because I play on easy and take shortcuts). F1 2013 uses the EGO Engine, and like other Codemasters games ends up being very playable on old hardware quite easily. In order to beef up the benchmark a bit, we devised the following scenario for the benchmark mode: one lap of Spa-Francorchamps in the heavy wet, the benchmark follows Jenson Button in the McLaren who starts on the grid in 22nd place, with the field made up of 11 Williams cars, 5 Marussia and 5 Caterham in that order. This puts emphasis on the CPU to handle the AI in the wet, and allows for a good amount of overtaking during the automated benchmark. We test at 1920x1080 on Ultra graphical settings.

F1 2013: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

F1 2013, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite was Zero Punctuation’s Game of the Year for 2013, uses the Unreal Engine 3, and is designed to scale with both cores and graphical prowess. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Bioshock Infinite: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Bioshock Infinite, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

During our Bioshock Infinite test there was a clear stutter during the benchmark that would make the game completely unplayable.

Tomb Raider

The next benchmark in our test is Tomb Raider. Tomb Raider is an AMD optimized game, lauded for its use of TressFX creating dynamic hair to increase the immersion in game. Tomb Raider uses a modified version of the Crystal Engine, and enjoys raw horsepower. We test the benchmark using the Adrenaline benchmark tool and the Xtreme (1920x1080, Maximum) performance setting, noting down the average frame rates and the minimum frame rates.

Tomb Raider: 1080p Max, 1x GTX 770

Tomb Raider, 1080p Max
  NVIDIA AMD
Average Frame Rates
Minimum Frame Rates

Tomb Raider is a game that seems to move almost entirely onto the GPU, not worrying much about the CPU or the DRAM attached to it.

Scientific and Synthetic Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks: Sleeping Dogs, Company of Heroes 2 and Battlefield 4
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • samsp99 - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    Agreed on the comments that this is a strange configuration of hardware. Would it have been better to incorporate either 3 4 Channel SAS controllers, or one controller and an SAS expander so you don't need to have 12 cables for the drives. It would then allow for better configurability for RAID.
    A USB3 header on the MB would be useful either with a separate hub, or for use with a flash drive for OS installation or as a boot drive.
  • lagozit - Tuesday, April 29, 2014 - link

    Pardon my ignorance, but what is "cold storage"?
  • DuckieHo - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    Write once, read few.
  • OCedHrt - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    Since I just got my hands on this board, I do want to point out a discrepancy.

    The C2750 has very different BIOS options than the screenshots here from the C2550 (much less, in fact).

    I'm also wondering if you would be able to test a Sil3132 card in the PCI-E slot. I can't get the board to detect it.
  • iwod - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    $400 for a MB like this.......
  • Calista - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    Well, the CPU is almost $200 itself, another $200 for a small run design doesn't seem unreasonable.
  • hallary - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    I found it quiet interesting ,Thank you for posting the great content on topic <a href="http://www.experttexting.com/sms-gateway/">... SMS Gateway</a>…I was looking for something like this…, hopefully you will keep posting such blogs…
  • KermitBMendoza - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    At $400 it's priced out of the core HTPC market; it's clearly intended as an entry level large storage server. As pointed out below, the spaghetti explosion from wiring a dozen drives with individual cables makes it unsuitable for most enterprise use (or prosumers who know better). http://sn.im/28v3ntg
  • SuperSpy00bob - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    No ECC support?
  • jwcalla - Wednesday, April 30, 2014 - link

    Of course it has ECC support. It'd be useless without it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now