Company of Heroes 2

Our second benchmark in our benchmark suite is Relic Games’ Company of Heroes 2, the developer’s World War II Eastern Front themed RTS. For Company of Heroes 2 Relic was kind enough to put together a very strenuous built-in benchmark that was captured from one of the most demanding, snow-bound maps in the game, giving us a great look at CoH2’s performance at its worst. Consequently if a card can do well here then it should have no trouble throughout the rest of the game.

Company of Heroes 2 - 3840x2160 - Low Quality

Company of Heroes 2 - 2560x1440 - Maximum Quality + Med. AA

Company of Heroes 2’s underlying engine is not AFR friendly, and as a result it receives no gains from the second GPU on the 295X2. This is a subtle but important reminder that although most games benefit from multi-GPU setups, there will always be games like Company of Heroes where it’s not possible to scale beyond a single GPU. Which is why maximizing single-GPU performance first before going wider is the preferred way to improve GPU performance.

Company of Heroes 2 - Min. Frame Rate - 3840x2160 - Low Quality

Company of Heroes 2 - Min. Frame Rate - 2560x1440 - Maximum Quality + Med. AA

Metro: Last Light Bioshock Infinite
Comments Locked

131 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dustin Sklavos - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Single cable is beyond spec for the connector. We've been hearing connectors actually melting. "Crappy" isn't really relevant here; this is the *only* card on the market that causes these kinds of problems.
  • Anders CT - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    500 watt power consumption is insane. It should come with an on-board dieselgenerator.
  • Blitzninjasensei - Saturday, July 12, 2014 - link

    The thought of this made my day. Thanks for the joke, needed it.
  • therfman - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    This is all very nice, but unless case space is at a premium, I fail to see the advantage of this card over two 290X cards with good coolers. The PowerColor PCS+ version of the 290X runs at 1050 MHz, is much quieter than the reference boards (40-42 dBA under load at 75cm), and is available for under $600. Is having a single-slot solution worth $300 extra? Not unless you really want have everything in a small form factor case.
  • Peeping Tom - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Is that a giveaway I hear coming? ;-)
  • silverblue - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Please, don't... I don't think I could stand to see a card of this calibre being offered only to those in the States... :|
  • JBVertexx - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    Is there any way to tell the temperatures of each of the two GPUs? Where does the temperature reading for the testing come from - is it an average of the 2, the hotter, or the cooler one?

    Reason I'm asking is I was skeptical a 120mm rad could effectively cool two of these GPUs. Given they are connected in series, one is bound to be measurably hotter than the other.

    Otherwise, this looks to be a winner. I was considering upgrading my uATX rig so I could do SLI. But with this card, I could keep the compact form factor.
  • JBVertexx - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    After some additional research on the web, it looks like the difference in temps between the 2 GPUs is only about 2 degrees under load, so pleasantly surprised with how well the 120mm radiator handles the cooling.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    The temperature readings come from MSI Afterburner, which is capable of reading the temperatures via AMD's driver API. And unless otherwise noted, the temperature is always the hottest temperature.
  • srsbsns - Tuesday, April 8, 2014 - link

    The point of this driver was improvements the the HD7000 series and their rebrands... Anandtech missed this by benching an already optimized 290x dual card?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now