Performance Benchmarks

In the world of laptops where I come from, we’re fast reaching the point – if not well beyond it – where talking about raw performance only matters to a small subset of users. Everything with Core i3 and above is generally “fast enough” that users don’t really notice or care. For tablets, the difference in speed between a budget and a premium device is far more dramatic. I’ve included numbers from the Dell Venue 8, which I’ll be providing a short review of in the near future. While the price isn’t bad, the two Samsung tablets feel substantially snappier – as they should. We’ll start with the CPU/system benchmarks and then move to the GPU/Graphics tests.

SunSpider 1.0 Benchmark

Mozilla Kraken Benchmark (Stock Browser)

Google Octane v2

WebXPRT - Overall Score

In terms of CPU speed, the Apple A7 chips still take the lead in all of our tests, though not always by a large margin. We’re also using different browsers (Chrome vs. Safari), and JavaScript benchmarks aren’t always the greatest way of comparing CPU performance. I ran additional benchmarks on the two Samsung tablets just to see if I could get some additional information; you can find a table of results for AndeBench, Basemark OS II, and Geekbench 3.

CPU/System Benchmarks of Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro
Benchmark Subtest Tab Pro 10.1 Tab Pro 8.4
Andebench Native 13804 17533
Java 708 790
Basemark OS II Overall 865 1062
System 1542 1529
Memory 419 503
Graphics 1032 2555
Web 838 724
Geekbench 3 Single 942 910
Multi 2692 2847
Integer Single 1028 967
Integer Multi 3135 3343
FP Single 897 848
FP Multi 3106 3080
Memory Single 860 922
Memory Multi 982 1391

Interestingly, the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 just seems to come up short versus the Snapdragon 800 in most of these tests. However, there’s a bit more going on than you might expect. We checked for cheating in the benchmarks, and found no evidence that either of these tablets was doing anything unusual in terms of boosting clock speeds. What we did find is that the Pro 10.1 is frequently not running at maximum frequency – or anywhere near it – in quite a few of our CPU tests.

Specifically, Sunspider, Kraken, and Andebench had the cores hitting a maximum 1.1-1.3GHz. The Pro 8.4 meanwhile would typically hit the maximum 2.3GHz clock speed. The result, as you might imagine, is that the 8.4 ends up being faster, sometimes by a sizeable margin. Basemark OS II, Geekbench 3, and AnTuTu on the other hand didn’t have any such odd behavior, with the Pro 10.1 often hitting 1.8-1.9GHz (on one or more cores) during the testing, and when that happens it often ends up slightly faster than the Pro 8.4.

Which benchmark results are more "valid"? Well, that's a different subject, but as we're comparing Samsung tablets running more or less the same build of Android, we can reasonably compare the two and say that the 8.4 has better overall performance. Updated drivers or tweaking of the power governor on the 10.1 might change things down the road, but we can only test what exists right now.

Overall, both systems are sufficiently fast for a modern premium tablet, so I wouldn’t worry too much about whether or not you’re getting maximum clock speeds in a few benchmarks – in normal use you likely won’t notice one way or the other. But we’re only talking about the CPU performance when we say you won’t see the difference; let’s move over to the graphics benchmarks to see how the Galaxy Pro tablets fare.

Graphics Performance

3DMark Unlimited - Ice Storm

3DMark Unlimited - Physics Score

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics Score

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics Test 1

3DMark Unlimited - Graphics Test 2

Basemark X (Offscreen 1080p)

Basemark X (Onscreen)

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

GLBenchmark 2.7 - T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

Outside of the 3DMark Unlimited Graphics Test 1 result, the Pro 8.4 sweeps the tables against its big brother. Playing games like Angry Birds Go! or any other reasonably demanding 3D titles in my experience confirms the above results – Adreno 330 beats the Mali-T628; end of discussion. I also had a few quirks crop up with the Pro 10.1 graphics, like Plants vs. Zombies 2 at one point stopped rendering all the fonts properly; a reboot fixed the problem, but I may have seen one or two other rendering glitches during testing. I have some additional results for GPU testing as well via GFXBench 3.0 if you’re interested:

Graphics Benchmarks of Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro
Benchmark Subtest Tab Pro 10.1 Tab Pro 8.4
GFXBench 3.0 Onscreen Manhattan (FPS) 2.9 5.8
T-Rex (FPS) 14 17.1
ALU (FPS) 13 59.8
Alpha Blending (MB/s) 3295 6847
Fill (MTex/s) 1956 3926
GFXBench 3.0 Offscreen Manhattan (FPS) 5.5 10.8
T-Rex (FPS) 22.9 25.9
ALU (FPS) 25.6 138
Alpha Blending (MB/s) 3093 7263
Fill (MTex/s) 1956 3780

The new Manhattan benchmark was one of the other tests where the Pro 10.1 didn’t seem to render things properly, and even then the Pro 8.4 ends up with nearly twice the frame rates. The ALU, Alpha Blending, and Fill rate scores might explain some of what’s going on, where in some cases the Pro 8.4 is more than four times as fast. Regardless, if you want maximum frame rates, I’d suggest getting the Pro 8.4 over the 10.1.

LCD Testing: A Feast for Your Eyes Battery Life and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

125 Comments

View All Comments

  • TestKing123 - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    "Well that was a waste of time since you obviously lack the minimum nerve, decency and intellectual capacity to understand my points."

    What points? All you've done is make blanket statements of YOUR OPINION with NOTHING to back it up with, NOT EVEN A SINGLE EXAMPLE as I've asked you to do countless times.

    Now let's take a look at your LONELY opinion (again YOUR opinion NOT SHARED BY OTHERS) regarding hybrids:

    "-you are talking a 13.3 inch, 1.4kg ultra book is a good thing to use as a tablet
    Anyone with a half sense sees how idiotic proposition this is.. but not you!"

    Who's anyone? Are you that delusional? If you think "anyone with a half sense" would rather use an inferior, limited android/ipad over a full fledged hybrid than WHY IS THE HYBRID MARKET SO SUCCESSFUL??

    Yoga 2 Pro
    Sony Vaio Flip
    Dell XPS 12
    Acer Aspire S7
    Razer Blade
    etc..

    I guess the bigger question is, HAVE YOU USED ONE YOURSELF? Rather than continue to talk out of your ass?

    The point is, people can use these devices as a tablet WHEN THEY WANT TO and a laptop WHEN THEY WANT TO. Is it that hard to understand or are you that plain stupid? You're opinion of "how a person should use a tablet" yada yada is the minority, and if you think otherwise please post in the Notebook section of Anandtech so we can all see just how narrow minded and deluded you are.

    "- if we actually take a usable tablet form windows (8-10" and a 500-700grams) and try to use it for your idiotic propositions of playing pc games, programing (lol) or ANY use that you can benefit from a laptop form factor..so we need to hook up a keyboard and a mouse to a 10" screen, put it on a table and squint onto it."

    Why are you hung up on the Surface 2 Pro? You have YET to truly point out this argument with hybrids. Do you even know which market the Surface 2 Pro is aimed at? Like other PC centric tablets and hybrids, it's aimed at people who need the versatility of a tablet and the power/software of a regular PC...usually professionals in their line of field....HENCE why it's given the "Pro" monikor. Understand?

    "Office, again only a professional who is living offa doc editing will have a real benefit in MSOffice ..and ypu thik those proffesionals will not therefore use a real laptop?!?!
    Average people that need to write something on their TABLETS will be more than served by the likes of Kingsoft office.
    You ever even used it or are you the one talking out of your ass!
    It can do spreadsheets, power point, pdf files, and more word and excel than anyone will ever need on a touchscreen."

    Again, you don't have a DAMN clue about who the Pro market is aimed at, or why it's even a large market to begin with. There is not a SINGLE office facsimile for android/ipad that offers the same level of versatility that a desktop application offers (not Kingsoft office that you ignorantly keep referring to), and PLENTY of people would prefer working out of a lower profile machine on the go rather than a full fledged laptop, hence why they're selling so well. Again, this is YOU NOT UNDERSTANDING the market and just forcing your OWN ignorant opinion. LOL!

    "As that's what I am talking about from the start..understanding what a TABLET really is and what people are needing it for.
    And that is a causal, comfortable media consumption in something they can easily handle, hold in one hand and carry around in a purse or even a pocket."

    Who the hell are YOU to determine for everyone how to "use a tablet" or what tablet to use, just because of what YOU think it should be? The people use 7" tablets are NOT the same people buying Windows 8 Pro tablets and hybrids. They aren't using these machines for simple media consumption to carry around in their purse like you do.

    HOW RETARDED ARE YOU to not even understand that you CAN do gaming (PC gaming at that) on a tablet, WITH OR WITHOUT a keyboard/mouse (you can plug in a controller, and many games work well with touch interface)....and a 10" or 13" screen is more than good enough to game on...especially with a QHD display.

    "Starting to sink into that tiny clouded mind of yours now??"

    That's funny, coming from you. You are the one that's narrow minded and incapable of understanding the different market segments. Your statements have proven this through and through, and everyone sees it.

    "And further proof of your prejudiced stupidity is that you you fail to realize
    that the games I mentioned are in fact a pc games, and a great pc games at that.
    I only and merely answered to your callout because it technically was off.
    You lack a basic understanding and reading comprehension.
    And you waste other people's time!"

    Again not addressing my point after exposing your flawed arguments. All you've done is mentioned mobile versions of games, not even recent, and somehow the fact that you can run the LATEST PC games on much more powerful hardware in a Windows 8 tablet/hybrid than that found in a dinky ipad/android SOC. To MANY people (and this clearly shows on this website), this is a MAJOR selling point for these devices. Your single minded, single voice OPINION means NOTHING.

    LOL!
  • darkich - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    Geez, this is by far the most ironic and sad discussion I ever had in my life.

    Let md draw out the freaking obvious to you and end this. Do not expect me further answering you, nutcase:

    HUNDREDS OF MILLION OF PEOPLE USE TABLETS.
    They buy and use them because they want a portable, light, manageable touch interactive devices for easy to use casual media consumption, social networking, intuitive entertainment for their kids, reading, and gaming.

    The ridiculous fact screaming into your face is that compared to tablet market, hybrid ultra book market is miniscule!
    Hundred million people will buy an iPad this year.
    The whole hybrid market COMBINED will barely, if at all, reach 10 percent of that!
    Now ask yourself why exactly is that so, you lunatic!

  • TestKing123 - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    What an absurd line of reasoning. The hybrid market is just now emerging, how the hell can you compare it to millions of EXISTING users in a tablet market that's been ongoing for YEARS?

    That's basically the equivalent of comparing the early HDTV market to the larger regular TV market segment. Or touch phones to the much larger button phone market in the early days.

    Of course, this is a line of understanding you've proven yourself countless times over and over, and yet again here, that you know NOTHING about.

    Hybrid sales and market presence is increasing rapidly because current technology allows it to be so. Compare CES this year to last year, there are literally DOZENS of new high profile hybrid models and more being released every month. People are buying them, and the market is growing. Hell, you just need to read this damn site every now and then to understand that, especially their Surface 2 Pro review (not to mention, the huge number of users in the anandtech forums).

    So please continue to pretend this market doesn't exist, like some kind of fanboy, and make statements that truly showcases your ignorance.
  • TestKing123 - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    Let me respond specifically to this as well:

    "HUNDREDS OF MILLION OF PEOPLE USE TABLETS.
    They buy and use them because they want a portable, light, manageable touch interactive devices for easy to use casual media consumption, social networking, intuitive entertainment for their kids, reading, and gaming."

    You just gave a list of general reasons people use a small profile tablet for. Now, do you understand what people who buy a PRO tablet or hybrid for? If you don't, then your presence in this discussion was absolutely a waste because you're too ignorant of basic principals and factors for the pro hybrid/tablet market. I outlined those reasons quite clearly above, yet you're not any closer to understanding. LOL.

    Again....
    The people who use 7" tablets are NOT the same people buying Windows 8 Pro tablets and hybrids. They aren't using these machines for simple media consumption to carry around in their purse like you do. The point is, people can use these devices as a tablet WHEN THEY WANT TO and a laptop WHEN THEY WANT TO. Is it that hard to understand??
  • darkich - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    Average tablet use case(in the overwhelming majority of the cases)..picking one up while sitting back on the couch after work, or laying down in bed before sleep, or after waking up.
    Checking the Internet, posting, commenting, watching YouTube, playing candy crush or Clash of Clans (heres a fun piece of info for you..that single game earned more than billion $ last year(!!)..and of course, you can't play it on windows at all, like hundreds of thousands of other casual touchscreen games)..and that is pretty much all people are using tablets for.

    Overwhelming majority of people that buy tablets DO NOT NEED, do not care, or even know about things like special features of ms office, and they wouldn't ever trying to bother with playing a pc game, let alone trying to play it in such convoluted way.

    And you call me narrow minded..damn.

    The mere example alone that tablet gaming is a business of billions of dollars while gaming on laptops is an exotic activity (huge majority of gaming happens on consoles and desktop) ..that fact alone perfectly reflects just how beyond clueless you are in actual understanding of the market and products.
  • TestKing123 - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    "And you call me narrow minded..damn."

    LOL...look at your own statement:

    "Overwhelming majority of people that buy tablets DO NOT NEED, do not care, or even know about things like special features of ms office, and they wouldn't ever trying to bother with playing a pc game, let alone trying to play it in such convoluted way."

    What about the overwhelming majority of people that buy PRO tablets, knowing SPECIFICALLY it is installed with a desktop OS and equipped with PC hardware, costing nearly 2x - 3x as much as a regular tablet?

    Not only are you narrow minded, but you are so bluntly stupid to understand different market segments. People who buy $299 tablets to sit back on their couch after work to play Candy Crush are not the people going to spend $1000 or more for a hybrid.

    For the people that DO, you're making yourself a moron by commenting how they should or should not use their device. That's the point of a such a device isn't it....to use as a tablet WHEN THEY WANT and a laptop WHEN THEY WANT, otherwise they wouldn't have bought it wouldn't they?

    And guess what, more and more people shelling out the extra cash to purchase hybrids because they function exceptionally well....it literally lets people HAVE their cake AND eat it too. The power of a full PC in the form factor of a tablet/ultrabook/tent/etc...

    Why on earth would you force a $199/$299 casual audience into that segment? Because you're too ignorant to understand the different market segments and factors of each, and every time you make a post stating the same thing over and over again you show everyone how foolish you are.

    LOL.

    Now, back to these points that you keep running away from:

    - Have you used a hybrid yourself?
    - Explain why the hybrid market is so successful with dozens of new models being introduced every month.
    - Explain the different market segments and the target for each
    - Give SPECIFICS (instead your ignorant "simple as that" exclamations) of why Windows 8 Pro hybrids are "POOR", in your own words.
    - Explain the rising popularity of hybrids right here @ anandtech.com and in general (personally, I think the trend is all ultrabooks will be hybrids as processes mature and prices continue to drop).
  • darkich - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    Of course I DO UNDERSTAND that one can technically do more on a hybrid with windows than on a typical tablet.
    That was never the question..what I responded to was your claim that windows hybrids are making those tablets useless and obsolete.

    And reality is completely defying that statement.
    People who need windows hybrids will buy windows hybrids, people who need tablets will keep buying Android tablets and iPads.
    First group are tiny minority and second group is huge majority.
  • R. Hunt - Monday, March 24, 2014 - link

    13.3 inch vs 9.7 inch
    1.4 kg vs 0.5 kg
    19:9 landscape vs 4:3 portrait

    Seems to me you're comparing two vastly different things. There's plenty of use cases where the iPad Air form factor is simply superior (and the market keeps reflecting that, by the way).
  • darkich - Tuesday, March 25, 2014 - link

    Not just the form factor but the OS also.
    There is simply no comparison in the number of touch oriented apps between iOS and Windows
  • darkich - Thursday, March 27, 2014 - link

    Average tablet use case(in the overwhelming majority of the cases)..picking one up while sitting back on the couch after work, or laying down in bed before sleep, or after waking up.
    Checking the Internet, posting, commenting, watching YouTube, playing candy crush or Clash of Clans (heres a fun piece of info for you..that single game earned more than billion $ last year(!!)..and of course, you can't play it on windows at all, like hundreds of thousands of other casual touchscreen games)..and that is pretty much all people are using tablets for.

    Overwhelming majority of people that buy tablets DO NOT NEED, do not care, or even know about things like special features of ms office, and they wouldn't ever trying to bother with playing a pc game, let alone trying to play it in such convoluted way.

    And you call me narrow minded..damn.

    The mere example alone that tablet gaming is a business of billions of dollars while gaming on laptops is an exotic activity (huge majority of gaming happens on consoles and desktop) ..that fact alone perfectly reflects just how beyond clueless you are in actual understanding of the market and products.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now