Corsair CX430 V2 430W Measurements

Voltage Regulation

+3.3V Regulation/Ripple and Noise
Load Voltage
5% 3.29 V (3mV)
10% 3.27 V (3mV)
20% 3.27 V (4mV)
50% 3.25 V (5mV)
80% 3.25 V (6mV)
100% 3.22 V (7mV)
110% 3.20 V (13mV)
Crossload +12V max. -1.52%
Crossload +3.3V/+5V max. -3.64%

 

+5V Regulation/Ripple and Noise
Load Voltage
5% 5.10 V (4mV)
10% 5.10 V (6mV)
20% 4.99 V (5mV)
50% 4.97 V (5mV)
80% 4.96 V (7mV)
100% 4.95 V (7mV)
110% 4.92 V (8mV)
Crossload +12V max. -0.60%
Crossload +3.3V/+5V max. -5.80%

 

+12V Regulation (Worst Ouput)/Ripple and Noise (Worst Output)
Load Voltage
5% 12.01 V (8mV)
10% 11.98 V (9mV)
20% 11.98 V (10mV)
50% 11.95 V (12mV)
80% 11.92 V (15mV)
100% 11.89 V (18mV)
110% 11.88 V (22mV)
Crossload +12V max. -3.50%
Crossload +3.3V/+5V max. -0.25%

Noise Levels

Sound Pressure Level (Ambient: 16dBA, 1m distance) and Temperatures (Δϑ to 23.4 °C ambient temperature)
Load Opinion
5% 17 dBA (1.0°C)
10% 17 dBA (1.9 °C)
20% 18 dBA (3.9 °C)
50% 22 dBA (6.4 °C)
80% 25 dBA (9.1 °C)
100% 27 dBA (10.5 °C)
110% 27 dBA (11.4 °C)

Efficiency and PFC

Efficiency and Power Factor 115 VAC
Load Efficiency PFC
5% 69.48% 0.810
10% 73.90% 0.919
20% 81.64% 0.927
50% 83.29% 0.951
80% 82.88% 0.968
100% 82.05% 0.974
110% 81.71% 0.981

 

Efficiency and Power Factor 230 VAC
Load Efficiency PFC
5% 69.97% 0.795
10% 75.12% 0.890
20% 82.15% 0.902
50% 84.90% 0.931
80% 83.79% 0.961
100% 82.90% 0.971
110% 82.43% 0.975

The sound pressure level and found out, that this PSU has a good fan speed regulation. The RPMs are tolerable up to 50-80% load. Beyond that point, this PSU is no longer silent, but still quiet enough. Note the difference the power grid makes in terms of efficiency. 115VAC means higher current and more stress for all power supplies, while 230VAC shows a worse power factor at all loads. Nevertheless, 0.975 PFC is still good and most users will find 83% efficiency more than sufficient. All the rails fall clearly within ATX specifications.

Corsair CX430 V2 430W -1 FSP OEM 400W APN (230V version) and GHN -1
POST A COMMENT

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • nubie - Friday, July 06, 2012 - link

    I still love my PC Power and Cooling Silencer 470, from before they were bought up by (forget right now).

    Of course at over $100 it really needs to be worth it, but I have seen some on the 'Bay for $30 or so.

    Too bad that PC Power didn't have a lower power supply in this test, I would have liked to see how they measure up.
    Reply
  • betam4x - Saturday, July 07, 2012 - link

    I would even go so far as to say 1 KW power supplies aren't needed for most configurations. Running a Core i7 2600k, 16 GB RAM, 6 Hard Drives/SSDs (2x2TB WD Blacks, 2x1TB WD blacks, 1x1 TB Seagate, and 1xSSD 256 GB Force GT) as well as a radeon 6970. under load i pull 400 watts from a 650 watt PS. A bit more than the review mentions, but most people would swear they need a 1 KW ps for this setup. Reply
  • veri745 - Monday, July 09, 2012 - link

    I, for one, would really appreciate some more comparison charts with all of the PSU's stacked up against eachother. You don't need every data point but a summary of at least idle and load, like maybe 50W and 400W, or 20% and 100%, would be much appreciated.

    Something so I don't have to flip through 9 pages to compare ripple, efficiency, noise, and PFC
    Reply
  • Pappnaas - Tuesday, July 10, 2012 - link

    Again a review by Mr. Kaffei.

    And again you didn't give any information about the size of your reviewed psu's.

    In my view you did not do your homework. You omitted basic facts by not listing the physical dimensions of your reviewed objects. Anandtech tries to keep up a nearly scientific approach to their other reviews.

    Would you omit the measures if reviewing a computer case? A smartphone? A NAS-Box? A car? A TV?

    I brought this point up in several comments, alas to no avail.

    I think you're shooting yourself in the knee.

    Switch to german:

    Wenn grundlegende Dinge wie Maße fehlen, wie vertrauenswürdig ist das ganze Werk? Wissenschaftliche Arbeit fängt bei der Beschreibung der Testobjekte an.

    Wenn also die Grundlagen wissenschaftlicher Methodik verletzt werden, dann stelle ich fest, dass Anandtech die sich selbst auferlegte "professionelle Arbeitsweise" nicht einhält. Sicher ist das ein wenig Haarspalterei, werden einige sagen. Meine Einstellung: Macht es richtig oder gar nicht. Sonst droht Euer Niveau auf das der PC-Welt zurück zu fallen.
    Reply
  • Bambooz - Sunday, May 05, 2013 - link

    Dein Niveau (wenn man das noch so nennen kann) ist wohl schon auf unter PC-Welt gerutscht. So richtung Computerbild.. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now