Final Words

Once again we have reached the end of another GPU launch article and once again we have a lot of data to digest, so let’s get to it.

For the last few generations AMD has always put up a good fight and always managed to spoil NVIDIA in some manner, be it by beating NVIDIA to market by months like we saw with the 5000 series, or significantly undercutting NVIDIA and forcing them into a bloody price war as we saw with the 4000 series. This time AMD once again spoiled NVIDIA by releasing the Radeon HD 7970 nearly 3 months early, but as always, at the end of the day it’s NVIDIA who once again takes the performance crown for the highest performing single-GPU card.

What makes this launch particularly interesting if not amusing though is how we’ve ended up here. Since Cypress and Fermi NVIDIA and AMD have effectively swapped positions. It’s now AMD who has produced a higher TDP video card that is strong in both compute and gaming, while NVIDIA has produced the lower TDP and weaker compute part that is similar to the Radeon HD 5870 right down to the display outputs. In some sense it’s a reaction by both companies to what they think the other did well in the last generation, but it’s also evidence of the fact that AMD and NVIDIA’s architectures are slowly becoming more similar.

In any case, this has ended up being a launch not quite like any other. With GTX 280, GTX 480, and GTX 580 we discussed how thanks to NVIDIA’s big die strategy they had superior performance, but also higher power consumption and a higher cost. To that extent this is a very different launch – the GTX 680 is faster, less power hungry, and quieter than the Radeon HD 7970. NVIDIA has landed the technical trifecta, and to top it off they’ve priced it comfortably below the competition.

Looking at the bigger picture, I think ultimately we still haven’t moved very far on the price/performance curve compared to where we’ve gone in past generations, and on that basis this is one of the smaller generational jumps we've seen for a GTX x80 product, or for that matter one of the smaller leads NVIDIA has had over AMD's top card. But even with NVIDIA’s conservative pricing we’re finally seeing 28nm translate into more performance for less, which of course is really what we're interested in. To that end, based on GK104’s die size I’m left wondering where GTX 680 is going to be sitting by the end of the year as 28nm production improves, as there’s clearly a lot of potential for price cuts in the future.

But in the meantime, in the here and now, this is by far the easiest recommendation we’ve been able to make for an NVIDIA flagship video card. NVIDIA’s drive for efficiency has paid off handsomely, and as a result they have once again captured the single-GPU performance crown.

Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

404 Comments

View All Comments

  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Wait the boost speed is 1110 vs 1005 right? So 10% faster in shader performance, which will = about 5% in benchmarking performance in the best case.

    Nothing to see here move along.
  • Janooo - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Well, 7970@1.1GHz beats plain 680.
  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Who cares, I wan't to know what the card comes shipped as. Thats what matters, anything extra you get out of that is exactly that, extra. What comes out of the box, thats what they are promising.
  • BoFox - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    Wait, you mean that HD 7970 needs to be overclocked by more than 20% in order to beat plain 680?

    How about overclocking that 680 by 15% like most review sites show is possible?

    Then the 7970 would need to be overclocked by an impossible 35% in order to beat a 680 overclocked by 15%.

    That was a nice try, Janooo!
  • Janooo - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    It seems you missed the point.
    Whatever speed 680 has 7970 can match it. These cards are equal in this regard.
    When they have the same clock speed then it looks like 7970 is faster.
    Look for AMD to release a faster card soon.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    We will have to subtract some mhz from the 7970 for having a larger core with more die space to make it fair, so transistor for transistor Kepler wins big.
  • CeriseCogburn - Friday, March 23, 2012 - link

    Plus were going to have to subtract more from The Heatie because it cheats on ram size too.
    Thanks Janooo you have great ideas.
  • BoFox - Monday, March 26, 2012 - link

    Ok, if I go by your analogy and say that overclocking GTX 580 to the same speed as HD 6970 (880 MHz) makes both cards "equal in this regard."

    When they have the same clock speed then it looks like GTX 580 is faster.

    Look for Nvidia to release a faster card soon ultilizing that 8-pin PCI-E connector on the PCB (which it did not need in order to beat HD 7970 overclocked or not).
  • CeriseCogburn - Tuesday, March 27, 2012 - link

    680 has made 1,900mhz and makes well over 1,280 ouit of box reference...
  • SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link

    Why, thats how it is setup stock. That is how EVERY SINGLE CARD will come.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now