Random Read Performance

The random read test requests 4kB blocks and tests queue depths ranging from 1 to 32. The queue depth is doubled every three minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. The test spans the entire drive, which is filled before the test starts. The primary score we report is an average of performances at queue depths 1, 2 and 4, as client usage typically consists mostly of low queue depth operations.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read

The random read performance of the Patriot Hellfire is disappointing, even when aided by a heatsink. Samsung's SATA SSDs outperform the Patriot Hellfire, and the Plextor M8Pe is twice as fast. The PNY CS2211—based on the same NAND and Phison's S10 SATA SSD controller—is the most embarrassing drive for the Hellfire to lose to.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)

With no particular advantage in power consumption, the Patriot Hellfire gets a very poor efficiency score for random reads.

The poor random read performance at lower queue depths continues at higher queue depths, and the Patriot Hellfire cannot catch up to the Samsung 850 Pro without a heatsink.

Random Write Performance

The random write test writes 4kB blocks and tests queue depths ranging from 1 to 32. The queue depth is doubled every three minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. The test is limited to a 16GB portion of the drive, and the drive is empty save for the 16GB test file. The primary score we report is an average of performances at queue depths 1, 2 and 4, as client usage typically consists mostly of low queue depth operations.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write

The random write performance of the Patriot Hellfire is relatively good, but it is not in the top tier. The average score with a heatsink is actually slightly lower than without, likely because the heatsink allows for higher performance early in the test, and then the drive's spare area starts to run out sooner.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)

The Patriot Hellfire delivers better efficiency than most other NVMe SSDs and thanks to its good performance it is even substantially more efficient than the lower-power SATA SSDs.

With or without a heatsink, the Patriot Hellfire's random write speed tops out at QD4 around 600MB/s. Most SSDs experience little to no improvement past this point. The Plextor M8Pe continues to slowly improve, but at QD4 its performance is sub-par.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light Sequential Performance
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • bug77 - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Patriot Minuteman! :D
  • Yaldabaoth - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Perhaps they are referring to the thermal characteristics.
  • lmcd - Saturday, February 11, 2017 - link

    "Logged in just to upvote this" -- comment systems in 2000
  • extide - Saturday, February 11, 2017 - link

    ehh back in that era "upvoting" wasn't a thing -- people would just say "this" or "x2"
  • romrunning - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Looking at its performance, they should have named it the "Campfire"! :)
  • BurntMyBacon - Monday, February 13, 2017 - link

    I'm going to go with "Stinger" ... to keep consistent with the missile theme.

    Who is it that's getting stung again?
  • random2 - Sunday, February 12, 2017 - link

    You got it. Seems kind of odd that a teck company marketing a retail product would use a naming convention associated with weapons being used around the world to kill and maim people. Wanna keep the politics away from your business? I vote with my dollar.
  • Holliday75 - Monday, February 13, 2017 - link

    We should petition the Pentagon to request they stop this practice of buying weapons with mean names as well. The Hellfire seems like a great platform, but we do not like the name. Call it Fluffy Kittens and we'll purchase 10,00 of them.
  • Stas - Monday, February 20, 2017 - link

    triggered?
  • Gothmoth - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    samsung all the way.. this stuff is just for cheapos.....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now