Final Words

The Vector 150 is a logical successor for the Vector. It doesn't redefine SSD performance, yet OCZ has managed to add enough improvements to the Vector 150 to make it a different product. The first one is IO consistency. While the Vector had good performance consistency to begin with, the Vector 150 takes that one step further. It's without a doubt one of the most consistent (if not the most consistent) SSDs we have tested and that's a big achievement. Especially for heavy workloads with lots of random writes the IO consistency is a very important performance metric because the drives tend to be in steady-state (or close to it) due to the amount of writes and you definitely don't want your application to be waiting for your SSD.

The second major improvement is endurance. 50GB/day for five years should cover almost any power user's need for endurance (or if not, you should really invest in an enterprise class SSD). Remember that it's 50GB seven days a week for five years -- even one day with less writes a week will give you even more headroom to play with. 

Power consumption is the only thing I have a problem with. For desktops the power consumption obviously plays no role (unless you're building a huge RAID array and want it to be as power efficient as possible) but for mobile it's one of the cornerstones. Battery life is one of those things where you can never have enough and while the rest of the components usually play the bigger role, an SSD can still have an impact of half an hour or so depending on your laptop. 

NewEgg Price Comparison (11/6/2013)
  120/128GB 240/256GB 480/512GB
OCZ Vector 150 (MSRP) $130 $240 $500
OCZ Vector $125 N/A N/A
OCZ Vertex 450 $115 $220 $460
Samsung SSD 840 EVO $100 $180 $340
Samsung SSD 840 Pro $128 $215 $570
Crucial M500 $120 $155 $370
SanDisk Extreme II $150 $230 $460
Seagate SSD 600 $110 $200 $380

With the original Vector OCZ shifted their goals and tried to lift up their brand image by focusing purely on the high-end segment and the Vector 150 continues that strategy. As a result, the Vector 150 is definitely at the upper pricing segment but there is always a price you have to pay for performance. Compared to SanDisk's Extreme II, Vector 150's most likely rival, the MSRPs are fairly competitive. At 120GB, the Vector is cheaper but at higher capacities SanDisk has a small advantage. However, it's good to keep in mind that we're dealing with MSRPs, so take the prices with a grain of salt until we see what the retail prices end up being.

All in all, I'm excited to see what OCZ has up their sleeve for their SATA Express (i.e. PCIe) based Barefoot 3 successor. We've been limited by the SATA 6Gbps bus for quite a while already, which is why there haven't been any tremendous upgrades in performance compared to what for example the SF-2281 brought when it was first released. The Barefoot 3 is a platform with lots of potential and it shows that OCZ's Indilinx and PLX acquisitions have provided the company with the knowledge they need to stay competitive in the SSD space. 

Power Consumption
Comments Locked

59 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kristian Vättö - Friday, November 8, 2013 - link

    Actually, I've already tested the Intel SSD 530 and am just waiting for Intel to confirm a few things so I can push the review live. I didn't want to include the results here as it kind of ruins the idea of a review if all the scores have been published beforehand. But you should expect the review to surface early next week :)
  • HisDivineOrder - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    OCZ's been taking a beating in profits. If you look at the sheer number of refurb deals on OCZ drives as of late, it looks like they're dumping their inventory at reduced prices with virtually no warranties, hoping to clear out warehouses. They're trying to make a quick buck in a hurry because their stock is taking a beating after their profits didn't line up.

    I'd say this might be one of the last times you read an OCZ SSD review.
  • Bob Todd - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    My only truly horrid SSD experience has been with an Agility 4. Data corruption, randomly not even appearing in the BIOS (on common Intel SATA controllers), etc. RMA'd it once. The replacement did the same thing. RMA'd that one too. The third one is just as bad, and it's sitting in a desk drawer until I get around to sending it back yet again. That's with the latest firmware. Completely anecdotal of course, but 3 bad drives in a row from OCZ when I've never had similar issues with a larger set of drives from Crucial, Plextor, and Kingston.
  • Souka - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    Reminds me of the Hitachi Deathstar...er Deskstar drive series... click click clck...
  • gus6464 - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    Who in their right mind would buy an OCZ drive over a Samsung, Intel, Crucial, Sandisk, Plextor?
  • wonderblue - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    I must be the only person on the planet who bought an OCZ SSD and didn't have it fail.

    128GB vertex 3 going strong for a year so far.
  • killerroach - Thursday, November 7, 2013 - link

    I still boot my desktop off of a 60GB Vertex. Not a Vertex 3, Vertex 2... original Vertex. Still going strong.
  • evonitzer - Friday, November 8, 2013 - link

    Yeah, I feel like I'm the luckiest guy around with my OCZ. Or else (gasp!) these comments exaggerate the situation a wee bit.
  • kmmatney - Friday, November 8, 2013 - link

    I still have a 60GB Agility 2 running fine, although I've been using it as a giant external USB memory stick for the last year (using a USB to SATA adapter that came with a Samsung SSD). It's work amazing as a memory stick, copying files at about 30mb/sec on USB 2.
  • Gigaplex - Friday, November 8, 2013 - link

    My Agility 3 is still going too *fingers crossed*

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now