Final Words

At its Silvermont disclosure, Intel promised performance better than any other ARM based core in the market today. Looking at our Android results, Intel appears to have delivered on that claim. Whether we’re talking about Cortex A15 in NVIDIA’s Shield or Qualcomm’s Krait 400, Silvermont is quicker. It seems safe to say that Intel will have the fastest CPU performance out of any Android tablet platform once Bay Trail ships later this year.

The power consumption, at least on the CPU side, also looks very good. From our SoC measurements it looks like Bay Trail’s power consumption under heavy CPU load ranges from 1W - 2.5W, putting it on par with other mobile SoCs that we’ve done power measurements on.

On the GPU side, Intel’s HD Graphics does reasonably well in its first showing in an ultra mobile SoC. Bay Trail appears to live in a weird world between the old Intel that didn’t care about graphics and the new Intel that has effectively become a GPU company. Intel’s HD graphics in Bay Trail appear to be similar in performance to the PowerVR SGX 554MP4 in the iPad 4. It’s a huge step forward compared to Clover Trail, but clearly not a leadership play, which is disappointing.

The big unknowns are things like video decode power efficiency, perf and quality of their ISP and idle power efficiency vs. Qualcomm.

Bay Trail looks like a good starting point for Intel in mobile, and the performance of Silvermont makes me excited for Merrifield in phones next year. What Intel needs to do going forward is simply continue to iterate and execute for the next few generations after Bay Trail and it will have a real chance at success in mobile.

My biggest concern is about the design wins we see based around Bay Trail. Although Intel is finally in a spot where it can be in devices on the market, none of those devices thus far have been any good. Bay Trail is attractive enough to garner more design wins for certain, the question is whether or not the quality of those wins will improve as well. In the tablet market there’s the iPad and the Nexus lines that are really the most interesting, and I don’t expect Bay Trail to be in either. Whether or not the quality of the rest goes up this generation and we find a Bay Trail in one of those devices remains to be seen.

Android Performance
Comments Locked

190 Comments

View All Comments

  • Krysto - Thursday, September 12, 2013 - link

    I'll stick with ARM for Chromebooks. Chrome OS is architecture agnostic. And I bet spec per spec, ARM Chromebooks will be better/cheaper.
  • Anders CT - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    I also think that the Bay Trails poor GPU performance is deliberate, so that the Bay Trail SoC doesn't cannibalize on Core/Haswell sales. A 50$ Bay Trail with HD4000 would simly eat up the sales of Intels more expensive parts.
  • A5 - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    It's a TDP/thermal thing. I'm guessing the J2000 and N3000 series will have more EUs. CPU performance on this is still waaaay behind anything in the Core iX series, so it's not really any competition for anything except low-end AMD notebooks and stuff that is using SB-based Celerons.
  • bludragon - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    I used to be able to keep up with all the code names, I'm starting to lose it now...

    "Bay Trail's overall 3DMark Ice Storm score (720p) is about on par with Brazos rather than being a competitor for Kabini. Bay Trail's HD Graphics core is based on Ivy Bridge and it's a cut down implementation at that."

    "3DMark's Physics test is basically a multithreaded CPU benchmark, which allows the Z3770 to pull ahead of the A4-5000."

    "If we isolate graphics alone however, the Z3770 once again falls behind Brazos."
  • Nagorak - Thursday, September 12, 2013 - link

    Seriously...it's almost like reading some sort of code.
  • monstercameron - Friday, September 13, 2013 - link

    think soap opera but for computer chips!
  • randomhkkid - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    I think the Physics score (extreme ) and Graphics score (extreme) in the android performance scores have been swapped.
  • randomhkkid - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    I'm impressed that this tablet-centric atom has higher multi threaded performance in Cinebench than my 25W core 2 duo Macbook Pro from a couple years back.
  • Yogerto - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    But does it support AESNI?
  • silverblue - Wednesday, September 11, 2013 - link

    Yes - Westmere does, and this has the same support, as far as I know.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now