Performance

There’s honestly not too much to say about the Charge from an applications performance perspective. We’ve explored Hummingbird performance comprehensively in a number of other reviews on older and newer versions of Android, and at this point the SoC is fairly well understood. For a quick refresher, the Charge is running a 1.0 GHz Samsung Hummingbird (S5PC110) SoC which includes PowerVR SGX 540 graphics and 512 MB of PoP LPDDR2. The drag with the Charge is that it’s still using the RFS filesystem which is slow, tired, and disappointing. If you can, root the thing, install a custom ROM with another filesystem, and also move past Android 2.2.1 while you’re at it. 

We’ve run all the usual benchmarks on the Charge for your viewing pleasure. Things are pretty close between the two 45 nm Snapdragon (MSM8655) phones and the Hummingbird-based Charge with the exception of one or two outliers. At this point there’s not enough of a huge difference to really make either of the two standout dramatically, though the Charge lags in the browser department and leads when it comes to GPU-heavy tests like GLBenchmark.

SunSpider Javascript Benchmark 0.9

Rightware BrowserMark

Flash Performance

Neocore

Quake 3

Linpack

Quadrant Memory Benchmark

Quadrant I/O Benchmark

Quadrant 2D Benchmark

 

Quadrant 3D Benchmark

Quadrant CPU Benchmark

Quadrant Benchmark

GLBenchmark 2.0 - Egypt

GLBenchmark 2.0 - PRO

Camera Performance: Stills and Video Battery Life: About Par for LTE
Comments Locked

61 Comments

View All Comments

  • whome.doyou - Thursday, September 29, 2011 - link

    So can we now make calls and browse at the same time with this 4G phone on the Verizon network?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now