Our piece on media streamer platforms indicated that we were in the process of assembling a test suite of media files. With the help of feedback from readers and some members from AVSForums, we managed to assemble a set of 44 test files covering various HTPC scenarios for v1.0.0 of the AnandTech Media Streamer Test Suite. Weights have been assigned to each stream based on how frequently one might encounter them in a home theater setting. The table below indicates the various aspects tested by each file, the assigned weight for the stream, and the score obtained by the Core 100 HT-BD depending on the success it had with playback.

ASRock Core 100HT-BD AT Media Streamer Test Suite
File Name Aspects Tested Max. Score Core 100 Score Notes
64.AC3.m2ts H.264, AC3, M2TS
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
002-480i30.MPEG.ASF.dvr-ms ASF, DVR-MS
2
2
PDVD10 Mark II
003-1080p24.WMV9.WMAPro.6Ch.wmv WMV9, WMAPro
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
004-1080p60.x264.8ref.mkv 60 fps L5.1 H.264
8
7
MPC-HC
005-1440x1080i30.SonyAVCHD.m2ts HD Camcorder Clips
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
006-1080p24.x264.16ref.mkv L5.1 H.264
8
7
MPC-HC
007-1080p.x264.DTS.6Ch.mkv DTS
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
008-DTS-HRA.8Ch.m2ts DTS-HRA Bitstreaming
8
8
MPC-HC
009-TrueHD.6Ch..m2ts TrueHD Bitstreaming
8
8
MPC-HC
010-1080p24.x264.AAC.mp4 AAC, MP4
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
011-FLAC.6Ch.ASS.Subs.mkv FLAC, ASS Subs
8
8
VLC
012-1080p24.Vorbis.ogg Vorbis, OGG
4
4
VLC
013-352p25RV40.RACook.rmvb Real Media
8
8
VLC
014-1080i25.AVC.AC3..MPEG-TS.trp TRP
2
2
PDVD10 Mark II
015-360p24.XVid.12LanguagesSRT.Subs.mkv UTF Subs
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
016-1080i30.MPEG2.HeavilyInterlaced.ts Deinterlacing for MPEG-2
8
7
VLC*
017-1080p24.TrueHD.PGS.Subs.mkv PGS Subs, TrueHD Bitstreaming from MKV
12
12
MPC-HC
018-480p.TVCapture.wtv WTV
4
4
Windows MC
019-240p.H264.AAC.m4v M4V
8
8
MPC-HC
020-1080p30.x264.AC3.m2ts H.264, AC3, M2TS
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
021-442p30.DivX.AAC.mkv DivX in MKV Container
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
022-DVDISO.iso DVD ISO
10
10
VLC
023-BluRayISO.iso Blu Ray ISO
10
10
Virtual Clone Drive + PDVD
024-1080p24.x264.DTS-MA.7Ch.mkv DTS-MA Bitstreaming from MKV
4
4
MPC-HC
025-720p24.x264.DTS-MA.6Ch.mkv DTS-MA Bitstreaming from MKV
4
4
MPC-HC
026-1080p24.VC1.AC3.mkv VC1 in MKV
10
10
MPC-HC
027-1440x576p25.WVC1.wmv WVC1
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
028-720p60.WVC1.WMA3.6Ch.wmv 60fps WVC1
8
8
PDVD10 Mark II
029-1080p60.AVC.AAC.MP4 HD Camcorder Clips
10
10
Windows MC
030-272p.VP6.MP3.FLV VP6 in FLV, MP3
10
10
VLC
031-854x480p30.H264.AAC.flv H.264 in FLV
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
032-1080p.VP8.Vorbis.webm VP8, WebM
10
10
VLC
033-480p24.MPEG1.mpg MPEG-1
4
4
PDVD10 Mark II
034-1080p24.xvid.avi HD Xvid, AVI
10
10
MPC-HC
035-672p30.DIVX.MP3.divx DivX
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
036-720p60.MPEG2.m2v MPEG-2, M2V
2
2
PDVD10 Mark II
037-1080p30.MPEG2TS.ts TS
2
2
PDVD10 Mark II
038-1080p25.AVC.AAC.6Ch.MOV.mov MOV
10
10
PDVD10 Mark II
039-1080p24.RV40.Cook.rmvb HD Real Media
8
6
VLC**
040-Anamorphic.MultAud.MultSubs.mkv Anamorphic, SSA Subs
10
10
MPC-HC
041-1080p24.VC1.DTSHD-MA.m2ts VC1 in M2TS, DTS-HD Bitstreaming
6
6
MPC-HC
042-1080p24.VC1.TrueHD.AC3.m2ts VC1 in M2TS, TrueHD Bitstreaming
6
6
VLC
043-1080i30.H264.HeavilyInterlaced.ts Deinterlacing for H264
8
7
VLC*
044-1080i30.VC1.HeavilyInterlaced.ts Deinterlacing for VC1
8
6
MPC-HC
Total
 
328 out of 336
*: Software based deinterlacing (Deinterlacing using VLC's Yadif filter) ; Intel IGP's shortcomings are exposed in the HQV 2.0 benchmark
**: For perfect playback, the CPU was overclocked to 2.24 GHz (FSB at 140 MHz) using ASRock's OC Tuner program from within Windows

 

Programs such as PowerDVD 10 Mark II and VLC use their built in codecs. For files played back through MPC-HC, the order of preference for the decoding filters which had to be tried out for successful playback is given below:

Audio

1. ffdshow Audio Decoder (Passthrough enabled for all formats in the Mixer section). [ Refer to Damian's excellent guide on how to achieve bitstreaming using ffdshow ]

Video

1. MPC-HC's internal splitters
2. H.264 Decoder :
    2.1. Microsoft DTV-DVD Video Decoder
    2.2. MPC-HC's internal MPCVideoDec
3. VC-1 Decoder :
    2.1. Andy's Modified Clarkdale VC-1 Decoder
    2.2. WMVVideoDecoder DMO [ Doesn't use hardware acceleration ]

Fortunately, the Core i3-330M is more than powerful enough for HD VC-1 decoding. The ArcSoft TMT VC-1 decoder also works quite well (inferred from the very low CPU usage observed while playing back VC-1 Blu-Rays), but it is not straightforward to use the decoder in MPC-HC.

Ideally, we expect HTPCs to score a perfect 100 in the media streamer test suite. However, Intel's stubbornness in opening up some key driver APIs and some sloppy drivers have resulted in a slight slip up. The ASRock Core 100HT-BD scores 97.62%, which is much higher than what many other media streamers can claim. We will use this score as a reference while evaluating media streamers and HTPCs in the future.

Arrandale's Integrated GPU HTPC Performance : Network Streaming
Comments Locked

107 Comments

View All Comments

  • ganeshts - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Shadowmaster625,

    This unit is slightly on the leading edge (The Arrandales were introduced around 6 months back).

    With $100, it is difficult to get a notebook with HD audio bitstreaming and Blu-Ray drive, even second hand.

    For the set of features it offers, we think it is a decent value for money. As for this being mainstream, I am sure there are many who spend $700 or so on a PC once every 4 - 5 years, and this is a perfect system for such people.
  • tmservo - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Pray tell.. if you've got a way to get a case/motherboard/ram/hdd/bluray drive and get 1080P for under $100, I'm interested. Somehow, I don't see that as at all feasible. Hell, even the cheapest AMD CPU + board and a cheap case alone is $100. So, however you shoe horn in all those other components, or then get the software to run them (supplied here) ..

    But, if you'd like.. give me a part list of what you can get that anyone could go buy, NEW, for $100.

    Or, find me a used laptop on Ebay with HDMI output that does 1080P and has a bluray drive for $100. Even if it has no screen. Needs to have a HDD, Memory, BD drive though.. and function.
  • cjs150 - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    53 db!! That is just plain daft.

    I suspect the design of the case does not help.

    I have just built a mini-server using a Atom 510 and I am sure the M/B was ASrock, mini-itx format and a PCI-E slot. Easiest build I have done even though the case was not perfect. As a server it is effectively silent

    I do not want an HTPC that creates any more noise other than maybe a slow running 140mm+ fan
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    cjs150,

    Note that the 53dB is under full load, when all threads are pegged at 100%, and it is just inches away from the unit. The farther you are, the lesser it is, and at 8ft, it was barely discernible.

    Under idle, the unit is advertised as having 25dB noise, measured in an anechoic chamber (Refer YouTube video from their marketing department).

    I would say, for HTPC purposes, the noise from the unit is definitely within limits.
  • tech6 - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Nice work Ganesh - I look forward to further HTPC reviews to see how the AMD platforms compete.
  • shamans33 - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Ganesh,

    I'm curious as to how the IR receiver is connected to the motherboard...USB and/or motherboard headers? Is it possible to do a force power off (if let's say the system is frozen) or to do a cold boot up?

    Thanks for reviewing more SFF items.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    shamans33,

    I believe the IR receiver is connected to a dedicated NuvoTon chip on the motherboard.

    The power off button on the remote puts the system in sleep mode when the unit is in operation. In my usage scenario, I had the AC adapter connected to the back of the unit, and the system was completely shutdown. The Power button on the remote was able to boot up the unit without issues (even with Instant Boot disabled).
  • johnspierce - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Hi Ganesh,

    Very nice review, extremely thorough, thank you!

    I have a question about how the HDMI handshaking works with the ASRock.

    I have built several HTPC's with both NVidia and ATI HDMI-out video cards and it seems they all have a problem when I have it plugged into my HDMI-switching Onkyo receiver.

    When I switch from HTPC to DVR and don't change back for awhile, it always has a problem with the display coming "alive" on the switch back. Turning the monitor off and on re-establishes the handshake, but this is an annoying trait of the current crop of video cards. Does the ASRock have this problem?

    Also, I wanted to "weigh in" on the lack of a TV tuner -- I really think this is quickly becoming a non-issue since I now use an OTA receiver for local HD and everything else gets streamed. TV Tuners will soon be an anachronism in my opinion.

    Thanks,
    John
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    johnspierce,

    I have the same handshaking issue with my ATI based HTPC.

    As far as I could see, I didn't have the handshaking issue with the ASRock setup, but the whole testing was done with 2 displays connected to it. I will do a 'standalone' test and get back to you on this.
  • Aikouka - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    A very interesting product indeed, but I've got my own three cents to provide!

    1) The price. Ouch... when I first opened this review, I checked the Egg to see if they had them in. Of course as the review mentions, I ended up finding the DVD-equipped model for $650. Tack on another $130 for Windows 7 Professional (note, I use Pro since it enables remoting in, which I find indispensible for a HTPC) and you've got nearly $800. If the Blu-Ray-equipped model retails for $700, you get $830 with the OS and then you have to consider that the blu-ray playback software will set you back another $100 (unless you can find them on sale... TMT3 has been on sale for $75 before).

    I've spec'd out a few HTPCs in my quest to find the Holy Grail of HTPC devices, and if price were my main concern, I'd still probably go with my own build. I never put my HTPCs to sleep, so I'm honestly not even worried about that aspect and I don't mind a slightly higher power consumption.

    2) The VIA VT2020. Have you noticed a strange amount of memory use from having this? I have an ASUS P7P55D-E Premium motherboard, which also features the same VIA audio chip, and I have god awful levels of memory use from audiodg.exe (Window 7's audio "controller"). At one point before upgrading my BIOS, I would literally see 800MB of memory being used by it. Last night I checked and I had 130MB of memory being used and I only had a single mp3 open. The worst part is that the last time I checked, VIA does not provide audio drivers for that chip. On their website they said that it was manufactured specifically for ASUS and to check their website for drivers.

    But who knows... the strange things I see are possibly just issues with the P7P55D-E Premium... it's a god awful motherboard that was released with buggy BIOS revisions and it's no wonder you can't even buy it from NewEgg anymore.

    3) The Front. Why do people want to see things like USB ports, bright blue LEDs and 3.5mm ports on the front of entertainment center components? The worst offender of the "sleak front" has to be that ghastly Intel i3 Inside sticker. I'd rather the connections be hidden under some sort of flap or door if they absolutely have to be on the front.

    4) The remote. As something to mention, when I was discussing HTPC stuff on the Anandtech forums, a user clued me in on a nice Gyration MPC-capable remote that you could buy off eBay (from Lenovo it looks like) for only $50 that provided some mouse support if you ever needed it. I have to say that I quite like it so far and it might be something to look into if you don't like IR remotes. The only negative aspect is the ugly and obtuse dongle.

    5) The comparison. It'd be nice to see how this item really compares to it's cousin, the ATOM-based version. Given the blu-ray version is available for $500 on NewEgg, does it handle all the necessary playback? A $200 savings for slightly longer application loads might be somewhat advantageous. Right now, I literally just leave my HTPC turned on 24/7 with WMC loaded up, so other than any necessary start-ups/shut-downs, I may see very little difference with the ATOM version.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now