Shuttle XPC ST61G4: On-Board Graphics Performance

The Shuttle ST61G4 will be purchased mainly for the ATI on-board graphics. To an even greater extent than Intel 865G systems, end-users will run the 9100 Graphics included in the ATI chipset. For that reason, it is important to first compare the performance of the ST61G4 to the Intel 865G On-Board Extreme Graphics in a comparable SFF system.


It is hard to miss the dramatic performance increase of the ATI 9100IGP compared to the current Intel 865G chipset. In many benchmarks, the 9100IGP moves the frame rates from useless for gaming to playable frame rate levels. It will be interesting to compare the upcoming improvements to Intel's integrated graphics to the 9100IGP. What may be even more interesting will likely be the performance of the upcoming 350 integrated chipset from ATI.

Shuttle XPC ST61G4: The Test Content Creation and General Usage Performance
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Cygni - Sunday, January 25, 2004 - link

    The IGP performance was stellar... if your going to be using the onboard graphics, this box looks like a good choice... but if your going to be using the AGP slot, the i865G looks better.
  • sipc660 - Saturday, January 24, 2004 - link

    i think my laptop is running the same ati igp chipset and apart from the crappy celery i noticed performance could be somewhat better..but i don't think that the memory timings are forced that slow..
    could it be that the shuttle wanted to keep off any possible temperature issues?
    i noticed anything video and or memory intensive turns my rather quite laptop into a godzilla.

    i reckon anyone purchasing SFF should still get the shuttle and wait for a bios update....that should close the resulting performance gap

    why?

    ban the freakin 3andHalf floppy drives...
  • sipc660 - Saturday, January 24, 2004 - link

  • gamara - Saturday, January 24, 2004 - link

    The onboard nForce2 was tested in a previous review, and had better onboard video performance with a processor that cost $80(Athlon XP 2600+) instead of $260(P4 3.0). Not sure if the settings were the same, as the previous article did not list what settings it was tested with.
    ATI 98 FPS Q3, 50 UT 2003 Flyby, and 38 UT Bot
    NForce2 129 Q3, 66 UT Flyby, and 38 UT Bot. Not bad for giving up 1 Ghz on the processor.
  • artifex - Friday, January 23, 2004 - link

    this may sound stupid, but how do you install Windows to the onboard RAID without a floppy for the RAID driver? Not to mention... where does the other drive in the RAID go? :)
  • Lonyo - Friday, January 23, 2004 - link

    ATi - Pentium 4, Intel - Pentium 4. nVidia - AMD.
  • Rako00 - Friday, January 23, 2004 - link

    Why compare the ATI to intels intergreated graphics card only. At least include the Nforce 2 graphic card too.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now