Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1 leads off our new 2017 benchmark suite with a bang as DICE brings gamers the long-awaited AAA World War 1 shooter. As mentioned earlier, we used DX11 for all cards, knowing that DX12 still has performance issues in this title. The Ultra preset is used with no alterations. As these benchmarks are from single player mode, our rule of thumb with multiplayer performance still applies: multiplayer framerates generally dip to half our single player framerates.

Battlefield 1 - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityBattlefield 1 - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityBattlefield 1 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Battlefield 1 - 99th Percentile - 3840x2160 - Ultra QualityBattlefield 1 - 99th Percentile - 2560x1440 - Ultra QualityBattlefield 1 - 99th Percentile - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

The 2017 GPU Benchmark Suite & the Test Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
Comments Locked

213 Comments

View All Comments

  • Lolimaster - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    RXVega56 offwers a damn good value, smashing the 1070 for $100 less-
  • Da W - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Think my Haswell + 780 rig is closing to retirement. A Vega 56 + Ryzen 1700X combo and a giant screen looks a good replacement.
  • thartist - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    The 1700X won't do any better for gaming if that's what you care about, but the card surely will.
  • Lolimaster - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    4c/8t extra to not care about cpu for a long time on top of being to actually do productivity things while gaming.
  • Da W - Tuesday, August 15, 2017 - link

    Actually i want a workhorse that can ALSO game fro time to time. What kids do to a life.......
  • tipoo - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    There's a cryptocurrency specific ISA addition, eh. People wanting it for graphics may hate it, but this may see huge demand from miners.
  • extide - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Yeah, noticed that one too, heh.
  • NeonFlak - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    So, after reading this review I'm not sure what the point is of the Vega 64 for $100 more than the Vega 56.
  • DanNeely - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    The same thing as the 1080 over the 1070 in Nvidia land; which has a similar price/power/performance tradeoff. It's the fully enabled higher clock speed version for people willing to pay a premium for higher performance and who're less concerned about power/dollar efficiency.
  • Jumangi - Monday, August 14, 2017 - link

    Not with its performance and terrible power/heat it does. The Vega 56 is a solid competitor to the 1070 but the 64 does very poorly against the 1080.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now