Final Words

The Surface Pro lineup has always been one of the most powerful tablet class devices around. Microsoft is no longer marketing it as a tablet that can replace your laptop anymore though, and they’ve acknowledged that most of the customers who buy and use the Surface Pro are looking for an ultraportable laptop. That makes a lot of sense, since the Surface Pro weighs only 786 grams / 1.73 lbs for the Core i5 and i7 models, and the Signature Type Cover only adds another 310 grams / 0.68 lbs. As a complete package, it’s only 1.096 Kg / 2.41 lbs. It’s not the lightest device around, but it’s still very light and easy transport.

Packing a full 15 Watt U series Intel Core processor into such a small package has been a challenge in the past, but with improvements to both the cooling and the heat output of the CPU over the last couple of generations, it’s no longer the problem it once was. The CPU is able to run at full power in the new Surface Pro without throttling, although the new power modes will throttle it by default. This allows the Surface Pro to run almost silently for almost any task, yet still offer more processing speed than the outgoing model.

The design of the Surace Pro is mostly unchanged, if you consider the size, weight, and thickness. But the new design is softer in the hand, with rounded edges where the old models were more angular, and it is immediately noticeable when you pick it up. Surface Pro didn’t need a full redesign at all, so the small touches have done a great job without messing with what made Surface Pro so popular in the first place.

The display changes follow the same theme. It’s still the same size, and resolution, but the new display now features an “Enhanced sRGB” mode which brings a bit more vibrancy to the colors, without affecting skin tones. For color critical work, there’s still the sRGB mode, which has amazing color accuracy, but for those that are willing to sacrifice accuracy for a bit more punch, the new Surface Pro delivers that. And even in Enhanced sRGB mode, the average error level is still better than many machines on the market.

Battery life has also improved, mostly thanks to a larger capacity battery, but the new Kaby Lake chip likely helps as well. Surface Pro will always lag the best Ultrabooks in battery life, because it can’t compete on outright capacity, but Microsoft has done a great job again with platform efficiency.

The I/O port situation is not ideal, and here Microsoft seems to be taking a stand against USB-C and Thunderbolt 3, to the detriment of its customers. Offering the full-size USB port that is on there now is, without a doubt, the correct decision to make. But it seems like wasted space to offer a mini DisplayPort connecter over a USB-C port which could easily handle DisplayPort duties (and so much more). USB-C is a bit of a mess, with different ports providing different alt-mode functionality, and that will continue to be a problem, but it would have been great to see a fully capable USB-C port with Thunderbolt 3 for future connectivity. Intel has announced that they will be building more of that into their SoCs soon, so that would open the door to allowing this in future Surface Pro models without having to add extra chips on the motherboard.

Surface Pro’s accessories have always played a key role in its success, and the new Signature Type Cover with Alcantara fabric is very nice to use. Hopefully the polyurethane coating will increase durability as well. It’s available in three colors to match the Arc Mouse, and the new Surface Pen.

The Surface Pen improvements are surprisingly impressive. The existing pen on the Surface Pro 4, Book, and Studio, were all good quality digital pens, offering replaceable tips, and a fantastic traction on the display, but the new version really brings it to a new level. The sensitivity is quadrupled, from 1024 levels, to 4096, and the actuation force is decreased from 20 grams to just 9 grams, plus the new pen now supports tilt. The latency has also been reduced to just 21 ms, and from testing it out, it’s amazing how you can’t easily get the pen ahead of the ink now, where there was always a small lag before.

Microsoft didn’t need to revolutionize the Surface Pro, and rather than mess with what’s worked, they’ve continued to refine it. A softer design, a wider opening kickstand, and better accessories all bring the Surface Pro ahead of the pack again. Even after being on the market since November 2015, the Surface Pro 4 was arguably still the best product in this category, and the 2017 Surface Pro extends that lead.

Pricing makes the Surface Pro competitive, with a starting price of $799 for the Core m3 model with 4 GB of RAM and a 128 GB SSD. The base model is likely just to get people in the door though, and the Core i5 model with 8 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD is likely the sweet spot, although it bumps the price up to $1299. The review model, with a Core i7, 16 GB of memory, and a 512 GB SSD creeps up to $2199, and the 1TB model is $2699. These prices don’t include the keyboard cover, which starts at $129.99 for the normal version, and goes up to $159.99 for the Signature edition. Compared to the Surface Pro 4, the prices are practically identical with looking at the launch prices, although the Core m3 model is $100 less expensive. The Surface Pen used to be included though, so overall, there’s a $60 price increase for most models if you used the pen. For an Ultrabook, its entry price is right in-line with the competition.

Wireless, Speakers, and Thermals
Comments Locked

124 Comments

View All Comments

  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Monday, July 10, 2017 - link

    Liar! how much is Crapple paying you?

    they never even made a sp3 with w7... in fact... my surface pro 1 came with windows 8...
  • Laxaa - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Brett, do you think it's worth upgrading from the SP4 for heavy usage (Adobe, SolidWorks) or should I get the Surface Book instead? I have the i5 w/8GB RAM and it's getting kind of limiting. At least when it comes to memory (SolidWorks keeps bugging me with low RAM warnings all the time)

    Or perhaps the XPS 15 would be a better choice?
  • Brett Howse - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Upgrading from SP4 to SP isn't something I would recommend to everyone, but you're in a situation where you needed a faster SP4 anyway. There's a big jump (as I'm sure you saw) from the i5 SP4 to this i7 model. Obviously the XPS 15 is much bigger, and has way more GPU, but you lose the portability.

    As much as this is an incremental upgrade over the 4, it's a lot of very nice small changes.

    I can't recommend the Surface Book right now only because it's really in need of a refresh - especially the GPU - but I do like the Book very much if you need more performance and battery life. I'd hold off though and see after it gets an update.
  • Laxaa - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link

    I'll probably wait for a Book-refresh before I make a decision. The dGPU would probably be nice to have, and hopefully they can cram a Pascal-series GPU into the base.
  • jrs77 - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    If it wasn't for the spysoftware named Windows 10 I'd probably would get an i5-based Surface Pro.
  • yhselp - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    1.4 GHz on the CPU and 750 MHz on the GPU for sustained loads - expected, normal, but still somehow disappointing. You're essentially getting a very low-clocked dual-core CPU paired with about 580 GFLOPS of GPU with up to 100 GB/s memory bandwidth, if my amateur calculations are not entirely idiotic. Of course, said CPU having hyper-threading, AVX, L4 cache, and the latest Intel microarchitecture, certainly helps.

    I wonder what the m3-7Y30 in the entry model is capable of under a sustain load. I'd suspect about 550 MHz on the CPU and about 240 GFLOPS for the GPU.
  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Wikipedia has some information regarding the performance of the GPUs in question here:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Gr...

    To summarize quickly, the 615 is rated at 345.6 - 403.2 GFLOPS and the 640 is capable of 729.6 - 806.4 GFLOPS, but that excludes variables specific to the Surface Pro in question.
  • Eliadbu - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Those absurd prices and base specs are so bad and the lack of ports. Also the fact that the keyboard and pen are purchased separately, it feels like Microsoft are going with their heads against the wall. Better wait for Eve-V value and the thinking of what the user needs are so ahead.
  • zeeBomb - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Awesome write-up!
  • ZipSpeed - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    I bought a Surface Pro 4 last year thinking it could replace my iPad Gen 4 and 2010 Macbook Air in one fell swoop. Needless to say, I couldn't get use to the size of the device in tablet mode, and it wasn't very steady on my lap when I used the kickstand & type cover. I decided to return it, and even now, I'm still using my old (and slow) iPad and MBA as I continue my search.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now