AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy

Our Heavy storage benchmark is proportionally more write-heavy than The Destroyer, but much shorter overall. The total writes in the Heavy test aren't enough to fill the drive, so performance never drops down to steady state. This test is far more representative of a power user's day to day usage, and is heavily influenced by the drive's peak performance. The Heavy workload test details can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)

The Patriot Hellfire exhibits an unusually large disparity in performance when the Heavy test is run on a full drive compared to an empty drive. Fresh out of the box, the Hellfire largely keeps pace with the other MLC NVMe SSDs, but when full its average data rate drops down into the high end of SATA performance territory.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

The average service times tell the same story as the average data rates: when the Patriot Hellfire is not filled, it can be lumped in with most of the other NVMe SSDs, but when it is completely full it loses almost all of its advantage over high-end SATA SSDs.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

The Patriot Hellfire experiences relatively few high-latency outliers when the Heavy test is run on a fresh drive, but when filled is experiences substantially more outliers and it ranks worse than any MLC SSD in this comparison—NVMe or SATA.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)

The Patriot Hellfire is not the most power-hungry NVMe SSD in this bunch, but it is still substantially less efficient than Samsung's SSDs and mainstream SATA SSDs.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer AnandTech Storage Bench - Light
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • bug77 - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Patriot Minuteman! :D
  • Yaldabaoth - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Perhaps they are referring to the thermal characteristics.
  • lmcd - Saturday, February 11, 2017 - link

    "Logged in just to upvote this" -- comment systems in 2000
  • extide - Saturday, February 11, 2017 - link

    ehh back in that era "upvoting" wasn't a thing -- people would just say "this" or "x2"
  • romrunning - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    Looking at its performance, they should have named it the "Campfire"! :)
  • BurntMyBacon - Monday, February 13, 2017 - link

    I'm going to go with "Stinger" ... to keep consistent with the missile theme.

    Who is it that's getting stung again?
  • random2 - Sunday, February 12, 2017 - link

    You got it. Seems kind of odd that a teck company marketing a retail product would use a naming convention associated with weapons being used around the world to kill and maim people. Wanna keep the politics away from your business? I vote with my dollar.
  • Holliday75 - Monday, February 13, 2017 - link

    We should petition the Pentagon to request they stop this practice of buying weapons with mean names as well. The Hellfire seems like a great platform, but we do not like the name. Call it Fluffy Kittens and we'll purchase 10,00 of them.
  • Stas - Monday, February 20, 2017 - link

    triggered?
  • Gothmoth - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    samsung all the way.. this stuff is just for cheapos.....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now