Battlefield 4

One of the older games in our benchmark suite, DICE’s Battlefield 4 remains a staple of MP gaming. Even at its age, Battlefield 4 remained a challenging game in its own right, as very few mass market MP shooters push the envelope on graphics quality right now. As these benchmarks are from single player mode, based on our experiences our rule of thumb here is that multiplayer framerates will dip to half our single player framerates, which means a card needs to be able to average at least 60fps if it’s to be able to hold up in multiplayer.

Battlefield 4 - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 - Ultra Quality

Switching gears to a game that has traditionally favored NVIDIA, the GTX 1060 comes out swinging here. At 60.6fps the card is just fast enough to crack 60fps at 1440p, meaning that even the minimum framerates should stay above 30fps. The ASUS card adds a further 5% here, which still a decent gain, though lower than we’ve seen elsewhere.

Compared to the last-gen GTX 960, this is an above-average game for the GTX 1060, as it improves on its predecessor by 87%, and more still with the even older NVIDIA cards. Meanwhile the performance gap between it and the GTX 1070 is about average, with GTX 1060 delivering 72% of GTX 1070’s performance.

As for RX 480, the GTX 1060 takes its largest performance lead. Overall the card is head of AMD’s 8GB competition by 30-35% depending on the resolution.

Ashes of the Singularity Crysis 3
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wall Street - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Yeah, it is amazing how many times the text "$249" appears in this review of a $299 card and a $314 card. Ryan is fully feeding into nVidia's price anchoring. I think that if the price chart shows $249 for the GTX 1060, then it should also show $299, because the $249 cards are nowhere to be found and explicitly not the ones he looked at.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    The entire Founders Edition things makes reviewing a bit more complicated. But since it's purely a stock card from a performance perspective, it's a very reasonable proxy for the $249 cards. No GTX 1070 is going to under perform the 1060FE, because that's the minimum specs allowed to begin with.
  • Wall Street - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    With Turbo Boost, I am not 100% sure that the single fan Zotac or EVGA 1060s which are the actual $249 cards will maintain the same clocks as the founders edition will.
  • Samus - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    What's depressing (for me anyway) is this card consistently outperforms my 970 in the games I play...and my 970 cost substantially more just a year ago. It's pretty unusual for a mainstream card to overtake an enthusiast card in one generation.
  • Death666Angel - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    Well, this was a full node shrink (no half node) and a much more advanced process (FinFET), so unfortunately, it was very likely. However, you've had a good year of great performance out of your 970, so not too much to complain about there. :D
  • Samus - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    True. The 970 will hold tight until I eventually graduate from 1920x1200 to 2560x1600.
  • spbx - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    after anand left thing weren't the same :(
  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    So true! There was a huge decline in the use of capital letters and punctuation by readers in the comments section.
  • Cygni - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    Yeah, the influx of the same terrible negativity posters from other websites has really been annoying lately.
  • Morawka - Friday, August 5, 2016 - link

    That's what popularity and the reddit crowd will bring.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now