While the original SHIELD Tablet review hit most of the critical points in the review, there wasn't enough time to investigate everything. One of the areas where there wasn't enough data was gaming battery life. While the two hour figure gave a good idea of what to expect in terms of the lower bound for battery life, it didn't give a realistic amount of time for battery life

One of the first issues that I attempted to tackle after the review was battery life performance in our T-Rex rundown when capping FPS to ~30, which was still enough to exceed the competition in performance, and avoid any chance of throttling. This also gives a much better idea of real world battery life, as most games shouldn't come close to stressing the Kepler GPU in Tegra K1.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Performance

By capping T-Rex to 30 FPS, the SHIELD Tablet actually comes quite close to the battery life delivered by SHIELD Portable with significantly more performance. The SHIELD Portable also needed a larger 28.8 WHr battery and a smaller, lower power 5" display in order to achieve its extra runtime. It's clear that the new Kepler GPU architecture, improved CPU, and 28HPm process are enabling much better experiences compared to what we see on SHIELD Portable with Tegra 4.

The other aspect that I wanted to revisit were temperatures, I mentioned that I noticed skin temperatures were high, but I didn't know what they really were. In order to get a better idea temperatures in the device, Andrei managed to make a tool to log such data from on-device temperature sensors. Of course, the most interesting data is always generated at the extremes, so we'll look at an uncapped T-Rex rundown first.

In order to understand the results I'm about to show, this graph is critical. As ambient temperatures were lower (15-18C vs 20-24C) when I ran this variant of the test, we don't see much throttling until the end of the test where there's a dramatic drop to 46 FPS.

As we can see, the GPU clock graph almost perfectly mirrors the downward trend that is presented in the FPS graph. It's also notable that relatively little time is spent at the full 852 MHz that the graphics processor is capable of. The vast majority of the time is spent at around 750 MHz, which suggests that this test isn't pushing the GPU to the limit, although looking at the FPS graph would also confirm this as it's sitting quite close to 60 FPS throughout the run.

While I was unable to quantify skin temperature measurements in the initial review, battery temperature is often quite close to skin temperature. Here, we can see that battery temperatures (which is usually the charger IC temperature) hit a maximum of around 45C as I predicted. While this is perfectly acceptable to the touch, I was definitely concerned about how hot the SoC would get under such conditions.

Internally, it seems that the temperatures are much higher than the 45C battery temperature might suggest. We see max temperatures of around 85C, which is edging quite close to the maximum safe temperature for most CMOS logic. The RAM is also quite close to maximum safe temperatures. It definitely seems that NVIDIA is pushing their SoC to the limit here, and such temperatures would be seriously concerning in a desktop PC, although not out of line for a laptop.

On the other hand, it's a bit unrealistic for games not developed for Tegra K1 to push the GPU to the limit like this. Keeping this in mind, I did another run with the maximum frame rate capped to 30 FPS. As even the end of run FPS is over 30 FPS, showing the FPS vs time graph would be rather boring as it's a completely flat line pegged at 30 FPS. Therefore, it'll be much more interesting to start with the other data I've gathered.

As one can see, despite performance near that of the Adreno 330, the GPU in Tegra K1 sits at around 450 MHz for the majority of this test. There is a bit of a bump towards the end, but that may be due to the low battery overlay as this test was unattended until the end.

In addition to the low GPU clocks, we see that the skin temperatures never exceed 34C, which is completely acceptable. This bodes especially well for the internals, which should be much cooler in comparison to previous runs.

Here, we see surprisingly low temperatures. Peak temperatures are around 50C and no higher, with no real chance of throttling. Overall, this seems to bode quite well for Tegra K1, even if the peak temperatures are a bit concerning. After all, Tegra K1 delivers immense amounts of performance when necessary, but manages to sustain low temperatures and long battery life when it it isn't. More importantly, it's important to keep in mind that the Kepler GPU in Tegra K1 was designed for desktop and laptop use first. The Maxwell GPU in NVIDIA's Erista SoC is the first to be designed to target mobile devices first. That's when things get really interesting.

POST A COMMENT

39 Comments

View All Comments

  • hahmed330 - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    Blimey! Pretty impressive.... Reply
  • lilmoe - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    That SoC impresses me like no other. I was initially concerned about the previous battery life measurements, but seems to be controllable, and amazingly so.
    NVidia really screwed up their reputation with Tegra 3, but it seems it's getting back on track. Now for it to actually hit more devices. I'm putting my money on Surface 3.
    Reply
  • kruzovsky - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    The Tegra 3 was actually pretty fast for the time, it just gained a bad rep due to the horrible eMMC ASUS had put on their tablets. Reply
  • HarryATX - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    I would agree. I once owned a HTC One X international and the graphics performance was just not ideal and even lagged behind the A5. It was a disappointment as graphics should be nVidia's strength but I guess they are doing much better with the Tegra 4 and 5 now. Reply
  • hung2900 - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    Tegra 2 3 4 all were over advertised and crappy.
    However, the new Tegra sounds very promising
    Reply
  • Muyoso - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    This tablet and SoC is getting me really excited for the next Nexus tablet which is rumored to be using the 64 bit version. Reply
  • Anonymous Blowhard - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    Delicious graphy goodness this early in the morning? Must be my birthday.

    Given that scant few games are really going to push the K1 to its limits at this point I don't think there's much to be concerned with right now in terms of battery life. At the Peasant-Standard 30fps it holds up quite well.
    Reply
  • nathanddrews - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    1. I'm not seeing K1 SHIELD in the AT Tablet Bench. Will it be added soon?

    2. Is there any possibility that GPU part of K1 could be used in an Atom tablet running full Windows? Will Erista support X86/64? Basically I want a kickass tablet like SHIELD, but full Windows.
    Reply
  • JoshHo - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    Whoops, I've released those results, they should be visible now.

    The GPU IP block could be used in another SoC, but it's a bit unlikely that NVIDIA would license their GPU to Intel or that Intel would allow NVIDIA to manufacture x86 reference designs or acquire an x86 ISA license.
    Reply
  • nathanddrews - Friday, August 08, 2014 - link

    Ah, it's under "Mobile 14", not "Tablet".

    This is what concerns me:

    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/product/1212?vs=129...

    K1 gives competitive CPU/battery life to Intel, but I don't want to use Android to get the GPU performance I want. I've currently got several Android devices (phones and tablets), but I'm just getting tired of Android's limitations. The problem is that Windows tablets pretty much all suck for GPU performance. Sure, I can use it as a Steam Streamer (which is great), but that isn't always ideal. Do I just need to wait for Broadwell? Will AMD, who already has x86 license, ever build what I want?

    Wish list:
    10-12" IPS
    1080-1600p display (4K?)
    Atom Z3770 CPU performance (minimum)
    K1 GPU performance (minimum)
    Windows 8/9 (non-RT)
    5 (heavy) to 10 (light) hours battery life
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now