Conclusion: Good Start, But Needs Refinement

HP's TouchSmart 610 is the first all-in-one I've personally reviewed, so bear with me here. The form factor makes this an unusual type of product that may force an individual to seriously think about how they use their computers. My frame of reference? My grandmother has an all-in-one (on my recommendation, actually), and my mother actually loves touch interfaces on her computers. It's not for me, but it's definitely for certain users, and I suspect they're people who just want a simple system they can set up and enjoy.

So how does the TouchSmart 610 fare in that regard? Simplicity is key and unfortunately it's a spectacular failure on HP's site in that regard. The configuration options on the hard drive are actually counterintuitive (why not just a 1.5TB or 2TB 7200-RPM hard drive?), and the graphics options are eye-crossingly convoluted. Offering last generation parts really doesn't help, in fact the only current generation parts are the Radeon HD 6450A and 6550A, the latter of which at least almost makes a case for rebranding since at least you have some idea of where it stands in relation to its peers.

Thankfully, all-in-ones are very simple to set up and use, but again I can see this hard drive just murdering the user experience and I'm beginning to seriously believe that for a touch interface to work and feel truly responsive in Windows 7, an SSD is that much more vital--SSD caching at the very least would be a great addition. There's space inside the TouchSmart 610 for an mSATA SSD, and at $1,399 that space really should be employed. Ignoring my gripes with touchscreen technology in general, I feel like HP's TouchSmart is a good start but again marred by both the storage bottleneck and by Microsoft's lackadaisical touch implementation. However you feel about Metro in Windows 8, touchscreen all-in-ones desperately need it.

For the asking price, the 610 feels unbalanced. I think in an enterprise market or deployed commercially, especially with that kiosk style slide, the price makes more sense (and you do get a two-year warranty standard as opposed to the usual one) and the 610 becomes compelling almost entirely by virtue of being the only touchscreen all-in-one that really does that. It doesn't exactly feel cheap physically, either, and it runs cool enough. Under those circumstances, I can definitely see someone picking it up.

On the other hand, John Q. Public is probably going to be better served somewhere south of the TouchSmart 610 in HP's line. The TouchSmart 520xt loses the cute hinge and a bit of CPU horsepower, but offers cleaner graphics options and better hard drive choices. Starting at $999 it may be a superior choice, but we don't know anything about the screen quality. If a good screen is important to you, there's the 610xt, which sports the hinge and thus likely the screen while being cheaper than the 610 Quad Edition we reviewed here (as it also starts at $999), but you have to field the confusing configuration options in the process.

I do sincerely think there's a future for all-in-ones, and the HP TouchSmart 610 is certainly a good one with some innovative thinking behind it. If that's the sort of thing you or someone you love is looking for, and you know the trade-offs, the 610 could be a good choice.

User Experience, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • WasabiVengeance - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    When reviewing a product, I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac). While I realize that some benchmarks can't be easily replicated (gaming), certainly the screen, boot times, and power draw could've been compared.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    "I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac"

    What is an iMac ?
  • shin0bi272 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    original version
    http://lowendmac.com/imacs/rev-a-imac-g3-233-mhz.h...

    and the current version
    http://www.apple.com/imac/

    current one doesnt look too bad but its hella expensive for what you get.
  • retrospooty - Thursday, November 3, 2011 - link

    LOL, thanks... I was being sarcastic though. He said "compare it to actual competitors" so I was clowning on Mac's
  • KoolAidMan1 - Friday, November 4, 2011 - link

    That 27" display by itself is $1100 from Dell or $1400 from NEC. That there's an i5 or i7 computer built in actually makes it a pretty good value.
  • RamarC - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    i doubt anyone is deciding between this hp touchsmart and an imac. the decision is mac or PC and then which model mac or pc.
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    I can see placing this on a desk in "kiosk" mode and using it as a touch only computer. Does HP have any plans on selling just the screen?
  • Roland00Address - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Not the same monitor, but look into the Dell st2220t 21.5 inch CCFL backlit, 6-bit E-IPS. It is 329 and works with any computer that is Vista or 7. It has been on sale routinely for $250 and once as low as $210.
  • jrs77 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Well, I'd actually like a device like that, but the screens are very lacking, especially in the touch-department.

    Resistive touchpanels are crap. Plain and simple. Additionally glossy screens are crap aswell, especially when they're ment to touch.

    So, make one of these with a matte, capacitive multitouch screen and I might actually consider such a system.
    Or even better, make one, that works like a pentablet with pressure-sensitive input like the Wacom Cintiq 24HD.
  • angelzero - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Only if this had an Active digitizer it would have been great.

    What's up with all the touch screens now not having active digitizer.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now