Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Now approaching a year old, Bad Company 2 remains as one of the cornerstone DX11 games in our benchmark suite. Based on the Frostbite 1.5 engine, it will be replaced in complexity by the DX10+ only Frostbite 2 engine (and Battlefield 3) later this year.  As BC2 doesn’t have a built-in benchmark or recording mode, here we take a FRAPS run of the jeep chase in the first act, which as an on-rails portion of the game provides very consistent results and a spectacle of explosions, trees, and more.

Bad Company 2 is another game where the 6670 delivers technically playable performance at 1680. Given that it’s a first person shooter it might be reasonable to drop down in resolution and/or quality to keep the entire experience smooth, but it’s playable. Indeed of the cards we test at 1680, it’s the slowest card we’d call playable.

In any case, depending on the resolution the 6670 has a 12-14% lead over the 5670, while the 6570 trails the 5670 by as little as 2%. Everything here is well ahead of the GT 430 and other slower cards, but well behind the GTS 450 and faster cards. Turks fits in very well between GF108 and GF106, it would seem.

Civilization V STALKER: Call of Pripyat
Comments Locked

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • codedivine - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Just a clarification:. I guess these don't support fp64?
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Correct. AMD only supports FP64 on the 5800, 5900, and 6900 series.
  • haplo602 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    6800 do not ?
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Also correct. The 6800 series (Barts) does not support FP64; AMD opted not to include it to save on die space.
  • haplo602 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    awww so my choices got reduced to the 5850 :-(
  • Taft12 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    At $150, 5850 is the obvious choice anyway (today - 6570/6670 launch day)

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
  • Macabre215 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Eh. If this is your price point you might as well go with a 5670.
  • Taft12 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Not if you want the 6xxx-series features.
  • OzzieGT - Saturday, April 23, 2011 - link

    Why? 5670 costs only $5 less on newegg right now and it uses more power. I would rather pay the extra $5 for the newest generation card if it offers the same performance.
  • dagamer34 - Tuesday, April 19, 2011 - link

    Don't these cards do AMD 3D? That's the only reason for someone to upgrade a previous HTPC card to something with a Turks GPU.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now