Micron has announced their latest generation of enterprise SATA SSDs, all based on their 3D TLC NAND. The new 5100 series is a full range of enterprise SSDs with capacities ranging from 240GB to 8TB and in three tiers of endurance and performance. Spare area ranges from a minimum of 15% on the density-focused 5100 ECO up to a massive 60% on the performance-focused 5100 MAX. Conversely, write endurance ratings vary from less than one drive write per day (DWPD) on the 5100 ECO up to 5 DWPD on the 5100 MAX. The 5100 ECO and middle-tier 5100 PRO offer M.2 models up to 2TB in addition to their 2.5" form factor models, while the 5100 MAX is only available as a 2.5" drive.

Micron's decision to use TLC NAND across the entire range is a notable departure from previous enterprise SSD product lines. The shift was made possible by two major factors: demand for the highest performance and highest write endurance has shifted from SATA to PCIe SSDs, and Micron's 3D TLC with sufficient over-provisioning can hit their endurance targets and the bandwidth limits of SATA more economically than a drive based on 3D MLC would.

As enterprise SSDs optimized for consistent sustained performance, the 5100 series does not implement SLC caching and all writes go to TLC NAND. This means that the random and sequential write speeds of the lower-capacity models are significantly impaired, but the larger models in each of the three tiers can saturate a SATA link with sequential writes.

Micron 5100 Series Specifications Comparison
  5100 ECO 5100 PRO 5100 MAX
Form Factor 2.5" 7mm and single-sided M.2 2280 2.5"
Capacities

480GB, 960GB, 1920GB, 3840GB, 7680GB (2.5")

480GB, 960GB, 1920GB (M.2)

240GB, 480GB, 960GB, 1920GB, 3840GB (2.5")

240GB, 480GB, 960GB, 1920GB (M.2)

 

240GB, 480GB, 960GB, 1920GB

Controller Marvell 88SS1074
Interface SATA 6Gb/s
NAND Micron 384Gb 32-layer 3D TLC
Sequential Read 540 MB/s
Sequential Write 380–520 MB/s 250–520 MB/s 310–520 MB/s
4KB Random Read (QD32) 93k IOPS 78k–93k IOPS 93k IOPS
4KB Random Write (QD32) 9k–31k IOPS 26k–43k IOPS 48k–74k IOPS
Endurance 0.45–8.4 PB 0.65–17.6 PB 2.2–17.6 PB
MSRP 55–45¢/GB 65–55¢/GB 75–65¢/GB
Encryption optional TCG Enterprise and FIPS 140-2 validation

The 5100 series has hardware similarities to the 1100 series client SATA SSDs and the consumer Crucial MX300, all of which use Micron's 3D TLC and Marvell's 88SS1074 "Dean" controller. The 5100 series adds full power loss protection and enterprise-focused firmware. In a feature Micron advertises as Flex Capacity, the divisions between the three product tiers can be blurred with manual over-provisioning. When reducing the accessible capacity of the drive using the device configuration overlay (DCO), steady-state write performance will naturally improve due to the increased spare area. But in addition, past certain thresholds the 5100s will also engage the same changes in flash management strategy that the higher-endurance tiers apply out of the box. Thus, a 5100 ECO can be reconfigured to be a 5100 PRO in all but name.

The different capacity and form factor options across the three tiers of the 5100 series adds up to 21 different models, each available with or without TCG Enterprise support and FIPS 140-2 certification. Many of these configurations will not initially be available in retail channels and will instead be sold primarily to high-volume customers. Exact pricing has not been announced, but retail prices are expected to range from 45¢/GB to 75¢/GB depending on capacity and endurance tier, and high-volume direct sales will be cheaper.

With the 5100 series replacing the M500DC and M510DC, Micron's business and enterprise SSDs have all transitioned over to their new naming scheme except for the S600DC SAS SSDs. Micron hasn't announced what model number their future SAS SSDs will use, but they currently use 1100 for client SATA SSDs and 7100 and 9100 for PCIe SSDs. They also reserved 2100 for client PCIe SSDs before putting those plans on hold. The 1100 and 5100 Series use Micron's 3D TLC NAND while the rest are still based on planar MLC NAND. Micron expects the 7100 series successor to also switch entirely to TLC when it adopts 3D NAND, so the successor to the 9100 series might be their first use of 3D MLC.

Source: Micron

POST A COMMENT

19 Comments

View All Comments

  • edzieba - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    Nice to see some more 2TB m.2 drives available, currently the 960 Pro is the only one I am aware of. Reply
  • Dave Null - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    And the 960 Pro isn't really available. At this rate, Micron might beat Samsung to market. Reply
  • CoD511 - Tuesday, December 06, 2016 - link

    In Australia, I've got guaranteed stock of the 2TB 960 Pro on the 28th of December. Reply
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, December 07, 2016 - link

    These are SATA drives. 960 Pro is PCIe so it's a very different drive to begin with. Reply
  • close - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    So is the name ECO (like in the text) or EVO (like in the table)? Because EVO/PRO would really be a confusing pick considering Samsung's lineup. Reply
  • Billy Tallis - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    ECO, not EVO. They're clashing with SanDisk's naming rather than Samsung's. Reply
  • shodanshok - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    Do these drives employ standard SATA command to limit the accessible LBAs? Moreover, on a most empty driver, is the controller "smart enough" to treat all free space as spare space? Reply
  • Billy Tallis - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    Yes, adjusting the DCO is a standard operation that can be done with free vendor-neutral tools like hdparm. I don't think the 5100 will adjust its flash management strategies without the DCO being imposed, but there is likely still some change in write performance as the drive and spare area fill up. Reply
  • Drumsticks - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    Nice to see, but I really miss the days of the m4 and the MX100 where Crucial had a high end drive that really hit Samsung hard on price. Nobody makes a high end drive today except for Samsung (and maybe Sandisk?). Reply
  • Billy Tallis - Monday, December 05, 2016 - link

    The consensus is that there's not much point trying to make a high-end SATA SSD, especially since the best you could aspire to is merely matching the 850 Pro's performance. All the high-performance efforts are focused on PCIe SSDs. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now