ATTO - Transfer Size vs Performance

ATTO provides a quick and easy test of performance over a range of block sizes, which makes it a good overview of performance. It illustrates quite clearly how performance plateaus as transfer size increases, with reads bumping up against the limits of SATA but writes being limited by the speed of the flash itself.

AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Performance

Any drives that perform transparent compression will perform much worse on this test than the Iometer tests. The SandForce controllers that relied heavily on compression are much less popular (having been largely displaced by controllers from Silicon Motion, Marvell, and Phison), but this in still an important metric to keep in the suite. Many real-world sources of bulk data (such as encoded video) are already heavily compressed and cannot benefit from any attempts at further compression.

Incompressible Sequential Read PerformanceIncompressible Sequential Write Performance

With a freshly-wiped drive and the short duration of the AS-SSD test, the drives perform much closer to their advertised speeds.

Idle Power Consumption & TRIM Validation Final Words
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntDX316 - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    we need REAL-WORLD performance than synthetic benchmarks

    this is like how it is with DDR speeds but they do absolutely like nothing even though bandwidth is like 10x in spread difference
  • SmashingTool - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    " and in order to boot from an NVMe drive your motherborad's firmware needs NVMe support."

    ^ Typo
  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Fixed! Thanks :)
  • todlerix - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    How fast does the system boot with the 950 pros? I read the NVMe slows boot times down by a huge amount.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Considering most people only the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue. If one BOOTs the machine many times per day, S3 sleep is a quick way back to the desktop.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    *Considering most people only BOOT the system once per day, the wait should not be considered an issue.
  • bji - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Even if I only boot my computer once per day, the time spent waiting for it to boot is annoying and I consider boot times important for that reason. When there is little other user-perceivable difference in SSD drives, a boot that happens 3 or 4 seconds faster is a significant factor.
  • Makaveli - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    You know whats equally annoying people that sit and stare at boot screens lol.

    Go get a bagel, take a piss do something crying over 10 seconds isn't exactly productive.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    This is called being enthusiastic about the wrong thing. If getting to the desktop matters that much to one's productivity, then using S3 resume would be the "logical" thing to do.
  • Rajinder Gill - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Shame on me for making a rational argument to irrational minds... ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now