AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy

Our Heavy storage benchmark is proportionately more write-heavy than The Destroyer, but much shorter overall. The total writes in the Heavy test aren't enough to fill the drive, so performance never drops down to the steady state. This test is far more representative of a power user's day to day usage, and is heavily influenced by the drive's peak performance. The Heavy workload test details can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Data Rate)

Performance of the 950 Pro is comparable to the SM951, which is to say that it's significantly better than everything else we've tested. The penalty when starting with a fill drive is a bit larger than normal, but simply being full isn't enough to tank the performance the way a sustained test can.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Latency)

Average service time and latency outliers are vastly better than any SATA drive, but NVMe doesn't seem to make a huge difference.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy (Power)

The high performance comes with the price of high power consumption, and the total energy used over the course of this test is significantly higher than all the high-performance SATA drives we're comparing against.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer AnandTech Storage Bench - Light
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gigaplex - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    What you're proposing isn't actually booting the drive. It's chainloading. The assessment is accurate, and chainloading is a long standing practice for this type of problem. It's also a hack that has no business being used for general consumer usage.
  • R3MF - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    does the supplied samsung driver work with Win7, and is its use as simple as pointing the windows installer to a USB thumbdrive at the appropriate point?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    The Samsung NVMe driver was provided as an installer program. After running the installer, there was no need to explicitly change which NVMe driver was used for the 950 Pro. I tested it on Windows 7, 8.1, and 10.
  • Badelhas - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I have a Vertex 3 128GB SSD. Do you guys believe I will see real world gains if I upgrade to the Samsung 950 Pro 256GB?
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    If your usage is "normal" for a desktop, I suspect "no" is the answer. Unless you're doing a side-by-side comparison. Watch the disk drive LED on your machine. If it's glowing constantly you're being limited by the storage, otherwise not. Or look at the drive load in task manager (shown since Win 8).
  • III-V - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    >For starters, the 950 Pro's power consumption increases as it heats up, and I've seen its idle power climb by as much as 4.5% from power on to equilibrium.

    Er, yeah, that's how typical transistors work... they get leakier as they heat up :\
  • boogerlad - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    What is the latency difference between having this ssd connected directly to the cpu, and through the pch? I'm very curious but no one has tested this.
  • TelstarTOS - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Performance is a bit of a mixed bag, but price/perf ratio is great.
    Waiting for intel countermove now :)
  • DIYEyal - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Does it suffer from similar thermal throttling issues as it's predecessors (SM951 and XP941)? I have seen people putting a heat sink on these and they report improvement in sustained performance.
  • theMillen - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    http://www.legitreviews.com/samsung-ssd-950-pro-51... will answer any heat throttling questions you have, ie yes! but a simple fan solves them :-p

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now