CPU Tests on Windows: Office

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

3D Particle Movement

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and results are given in seconds.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

7-zip Benchmark

Conclusions on Office Benchmarks

Similar to the professional tests, the gains here are in-line with what we would expect with +200 MHz overclocks.

CPU Tests on Windows: Professional Linux Performance
Comments Locked

103 Comments

View All Comments

  • Oxford Guy - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    The problem is that overclocks should NEVER be called stable if they aren't.

    And, I don't like the way Anandtech pumps ridiculous amounts of voltage into chips (like they did with the 8320E).
  • Gigaplex - Sunday, September 27, 2015 - link

    Production software in my books is any released software that completes a useful task, rather than just run synthetic tests.
  • hyno111 - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    Is there a temperature chart for overclocking?
  • sonny73n - Sunday, August 30, 2015 - link

    Ian seems to miss the most important part in OCing.
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, September 3, 2015 - link

    The temperature depends strongly on your cooling, TIM application etc. If Ian included those numbers, people would be shouting "but I get different values with..."
  • kneelbeforezod - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    12% better performance for a 32% power increase. uha.
  • StrangerGuy - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    I OCed a cheapo AXP1700 by 25% on a budget nForce 2 board and stock cooling simply with FSB 266->333. I OCed my $183 E6300 that surpassed a $1000 X6800 in performance.

    Now, Intel and Asus et al thinks they are doing us a favor top-end mainstream CPUs that are barely overclockable on even on the most pricey of mobos, and hardly anyone calling out their bullshit, just because of unlocked multipiers? Gimme a break.

    Am I the only sane guy here or what?
  • jihe - Monday, August 31, 2015 - link

    That's why I'm still on nehalem, overclocking an x5650 is much more fun than this pay a premium to overclock crap that intel has been feeding us.
  • SanX - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    Ian, add at least 4790k at 4.5-4.8GHz for us to see how bad new processors actually are
  • V900 - Saturday, August 29, 2015 - link

    Isn't this right about the usual time an AMD troll jumps in to tell us how you can overclock Kaveri to 5 Ghz, and you don't even need an aircooler or anything!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now