Clevo P750ZM Thermals and Noise

Considering the high-end hardware present in the P750ZM, the thermals and noise are going to be of particular interest. Performance is great but if your notebook is screaming loud or has to routinely throttle the clock speeds any time you use it as intended then you might end up looking elsewhere. Thankfully, while the P750ZM certainly won’t qualify as a silent or exceptionally quiet laptop, it’s also not horribly loud – even at maximum fan speed. More importantly, the thermals on the GPU are really quite good…though the CPU thermals aren’t necessarily all that great.

Before we get to the results of our thermals testing, we ran the P750ZM in two modes. The default cooling is just what you’d expect: as the temperatures increase, fan speeds increase in response. There’s a second mode that is often available on gaming notebooks: a maximum fan speed mode. The idea is to keep the system as cool as possible, hopefully avoiding any throttling or variability in frame rates. This mode is activated by pressing Fn+1, and it has a nice side effect of letting us know what the absolute maximum noise level will be.

Thermals and Throttling

It’s interesting to look at the results of our thermal testing. The GTX 980M likely uses around 100W, perhaps even as much as 125W; the i7-4790K by comparison is supposed to use at most 88W. We mentioned earlier that the cooling arrangement seems to put more of an emphasis on keeping the CPU cool, with five heatpipes on the CPU and chipset compared to four heatpipes on the GPU MXM module; the above results help explain why that was likely done. With a higher thermal density (88W with a die size of 177 mm2 compared to 125W in 398 mm2), even though the GPU has more total heat to dissipate the CPU has a more difficult time staying cool.

What ends up happening is that even at stock clocks, depending on the game there will be some fluctuations in CPU clock speeds. For our testing, I used Dying Light, a recent title that tends to be one of the more demanding games when it comes to CPU and GPU workloads. Power draw for the entire notebook at the wall tends to be around 200-210W, which is up to 40W more than what I noticed with some other games. Part of the reason for the heavy CPU load is that we’ve set the draw distance to maximum, so even at maximum quality settings Dying Light can end up partially CPU bottlenecked (at least with the GTX 980M).

The net result of our thermal testing is twofold. First, the GPU generally plugs along merrily at maximum clocks with no trouble – we measured a maximum temperature of just 77C, and the fans aren’t at maximum speed for this test. On the other hand, the CPU gets into the high 90s, even hitting 99C on occasion, and it does undergo a bit of throttling to keep thermals in check. We need to be careful about that word “throttling”, however, as there are differing opinions on what that actually means. For some users, anything less than maximum Turbo Boost might be considered “throttling”, but in general we only use the term if clock speeds drop below the rated non-Turbo clock speeds (4.0GHz in this case), and more importantly it the CPU reports that any of the cores are throttling.

We used HWiNFO64 to log temperatures, clock speeds, and other system variables; one of the things HWiNFO64 reports is whether or not the CPU cores are throttling. In the case of the i7-4790K, under any sustained CPU load we do see reports of throttling on all of the cores (usually only one or two at a time). However, clock speeds are still typically above the rated 4.0GHz, with only occasional drops to lower clocks. It’s also important to note that it’s not clear if the drops are actually being triggered by the CPU throttling or if the game periodically does something that drops its demand on the CPU for a moment (e.g. loading additional assets from the storage subsystem might cause a momentary hiccup). Either way, with CPU temperatures hitting high 90s, it’s certainly at least a bit of a concern.

Interestingly, when we activate maximum cooling (Fn+1), that’s enough to fix the problem with CPU thermals and throttling. Instead of topping out in the high 90s, the maximum CPU core temperatures are now in the low 90s or upper 80s. Perhaps more importantly, the minimum CPU clocks on any core are all at 4.2GHz, where without the higher fan speeds we saw periodic drops as low as 800-1000MHz. Average CPU clocks are also up more than 100MHz over a period of an hour or so of testing. GPU performance doesn’t really change any, but temperatures also drop with a maximum of 67C now.

As far as surface temperatures go, as you’d expect the P750ZM does get a bit warm at the back near the CPU and GPU, but the plastic chassis does help to avoid conducting too much heat into the surfaces of the laptop. While the exhaust temperatures are well above 50C, most of the laptop surfaces are closer to 35C even under load, and it’s only the back inch or so around the exhausts that gets to 40C. Again, maxing out the fan speeds does reduce the exhaust and surface temperatures a decent amount if needed.

Cooling overall is good, and at high fan speed it’s very good. But what about noise levels?

System Noise

Anyone expecting a silent notebook with a desktop CPU and GTX 980M is expecting a bit much. However, that doesn’t mean the system needs to be exceptionally noisy. At idle the P750ZM tends to be pretty close to the noise floor of my house (30dB), though on occasion even in lighter workloads like surfing the web the fans will kick on for a little bit and it will go up to 35-37 dB. For gaming or CPU intensive workloads, the system gets quite a bit louder; after a few minutes the fans settled in at 41.3 dB, which isn’t too bad. Maximum fan speed on the other hand gets pretty loud, reaching nearly 48 dB.

While we’ve tested notebooks that run a lot quieter – including the MSI GT72 and ASUS G751 – they also don’t have to deal with a full voltage desktop CPU. There’s a reason this sort of processor isn’t typically used in notebooks, and even in desktops it needs fairly potent cooling to run properly. That the P750ZM mostly runs the i7-4790K without problems is good news, and as we’ve shown already performance is certainly higher than any mobile CPU we’ve tested. If the extra 10-25% boost in performance (relative to mobile parts) is helpful, the P750ZM is definitely worth a look.

Clevo P750ZM LCD: 4K IGZO Clevo P750ZM: Potent DTR
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    http://ark.intel.com/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-...

    And yes, there are non-desktop CPU notebooks from Clevo, though they're not identical to the P750ZM. The Eurocom M5 Pro is based on the Clevo P650SE chassis and has specs similar to the Gigabyte P35W v3 -- Optimus (I believe), i7-4710HQ, GTX 980M.
    http://www.eurocom.com/ec/configure(2,257,0)ec
  • will54 - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    though I think the P650 solders there cpu and gpu on the mainboard so there is a tradeoff.
  • Khenglish - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    The reason why this laptop exists is because Intel is no longer selling socketed mobile processors. MSI, Alienware, and ASUS all went full BGA cpus for their entire lineup. Clevo did this for most laptops, but has this laptop to corner the entire socketed market all to itself.

    The only issue I see with this is the heatspreader. Haswell's heatspreader is not good at all, and this shows in the CPU vs GPU temps. In the P750zm there is a heatpipe connecting the GPU and CPU heatsinks, so a difference of more than ~10C should never happen.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    Keep in mind that i7-4790K is technically Devil's Canyon, and part of the difference was a change in the Thermal Interface Material:
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/8227/devils-canyon-r...
  • Stuka87 - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    The 4790K is an 88W chip. The 4790S is a 3.2GHz part. The 4790K is a 4GHz part. The 4790K is a desktop chip, not a mobile chip.
  • Samus - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    The i5-4690k and i7-4790k are 88w parts. The previous "non devils canyon" parts (4670k, 4770k) were 84w. The "Xeon" equivalent of these chips, ie, the E3-1230v3, is 80w.

    That is TDP. It doesn't mean the chips use 88w. It simply means they are manufactured to handle a higher temperature (tweaked power delivery on the packaging, better thermal insulation, etc) and even if not overclocked, this means they will turbo up to higher frequencies and for longer periods of time.

    And considering the IGP isn't even being used (that's 1/4th the die area of Haswell) there is a lot of cooling headroom since many transistors aren't even being used. Typically these chips will use around 70w at stock load without the IGP enabled.
  • warmon6 - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    Er... the desktop 4790k is 88W.

    And for dekstop-replacement laptops this is pretty tame vs the LGA 1366 desktop cpu that were in these kinds of laptop's when I last payed attention to them and last i remember all the core i7 1366 cpu's were 130W chips.

    (and I would easly guess there are LGA 2011 and 2011-3 base laptops as well out there.)
  • hyno111 - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    I'm waiting to see how 65w broadwell CPU performs on this beast...
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    You'll need a new chipset and motherboard, so it will probably be in the P751ZM or something like that. From what I've seen, Broadwell will be about 5% faster at the same clocks compared to Haswell.
  • Telemachus13 - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    Why would a new chipset be needed? It was my understanding that Z97 supported Broadwell.
    Also, P751ZM is already the name of the European version.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now