Clevo P750ZM Thermals and Noise

Considering the high-end hardware present in the P750ZM, the thermals and noise are going to be of particular interest. Performance is great but if your notebook is screaming loud or has to routinely throttle the clock speeds any time you use it as intended then you might end up looking elsewhere. Thankfully, while the P750ZM certainly won’t qualify as a silent or exceptionally quiet laptop, it’s also not horribly loud – even at maximum fan speed. More importantly, the thermals on the GPU are really quite good…though the CPU thermals aren’t necessarily all that great.

Before we get to the results of our thermals testing, we ran the P750ZM in two modes. The default cooling is just what you’d expect: as the temperatures increase, fan speeds increase in response. There’s a second mode that is often available on gaming notebooks: a maximum fan speed mode. The idea is to keep the system as cool as possible, hopefully avoiding any throttling or variability in frame rates. This mode is activated by pressing Fn+1, and it has a nice side effect of letting us know what the absolute maximum noise level will be.

Thermals and Throttling

It’s interesting to look at the results of our thermal testing. The GTX 980M likely uses around 100W, perhaps even as much as 125W; the i7-4790K by comparison is supposed to use at most 88W. We mentioned earlier that the cooling arrangement seems to put more of an emphasis on keeping the CPU cool, with five heatpipes on the CPU and chipset compared to four heatpipes on the GPU MXM module; the above results help explain why that was likely done. With a higher thermal density (88W with a die size of 177 mm2 compared to 125W in 398 mm2), even though the GPU has more total heat to dissipate the CPU has a more difficult time staying cool.

What ends up happening is that even at stock clocks, depending on the game there will be some fluctuations in CPU clock speeds. For our testing, I used Dying Light, a recent title that tends to be one of the more demanding games when it comes to CPU and GPU workloads. Power draw for the entire notebook at the wall tends to be around 200-210W, which is up to 40W more than what I noticed with some other games. Part of the reason for the heavy CPU load is that we’ve set the draw distance to maximum, so even at maximum quality settings Dying Light can end up partially CPU bottlenecked (at least with the GTX 980M).

The net result of our thermal testing is twofold. First, the GPU generally plugs along merrily at maximum clocks with no trouble – we measured a maximum temperature of just 77C, and the fans aren’t at maximum speed for this test. On the other hand, the CPU gets into the high 90s, even hitting 99C on occasion, and it does undergo a bit of throttling to keep thermals in check. We need to be careful about that word “throttling”, however, as there are differing opinions on what that actually means. For some users, anything less than maximum Turbo Boost might be considered “throttling”, but in general we only use the term if clock speeds drop below the rated non-Turbo clock speeds (4.0GHz in this case), and more importantly it the CPU reports that any of the cores are throttling.

We used HWiNFO64 to log temperatures, clock speeds, and other system variables; one of the things HWiNFO64 reports is whether or not the CPU cores are throttling. In the case of the i7-4790K, under any sustained CPU load we do see reports of throttling on all of the cores (usually only one or two at a time). However, clock speeds are still typically above the rated 4.0GHz, with only occasional drops to lower clocks. It’s also important to note that it’s not clear if the drops are actually being triggered by the CPU throttling or if the game periodically does something that drops its demand on the CPU for a moment (e.g. loading additional assets from the storage subsystem might cause a momentary hiccup). Either way, with CPU temperatures hitting high 90s, it’s certainly at least a bit of a concern.

Interestingly, when we activate maximum cooling (Fn+1), that’s enough to fix the problem with CPU thermals and throttling. Instead of topping out in the high 90s, the maximum CPU core temperatures are now in the low 90s or upper 80s. Perhaps more importantly, the minimum CPU clocks on any core are all at 4.2GHz, where without the higher fan speeds we saw periodic drops as low as 800-1000MHz. Average CPU clocks are also up more than 100MHz over a period of an hour or so of testing. GPU performance doesn’t really change any, but temperatures also drop with a maximum of 67C now.

As far as surface temperatures go, as you’d expect the P750ZM does get a bit warm at the back near the CPU and GPU, but the plastic chassis does help to avoid conducting too much heat into the surfaces of the laptop. While the exhaust temperatures are well above 50C, most of the laptop surfaces are closer to 35C even under load, and it’s only the back inch or so around the exhausts that gets to 40C. Again, maxing out the fan speeds does reduce the exhaust and surface temperatures a decent amount if needed.

Cooling overall is good, and at high fan speed it’s very good. But what about noise levels?

System Noise

Anyone expecting a silent notebook with a desktop CPU and GTX 980M is expecting a bit much. However, that doesn’t mean the system needs to be exceptionally noisy. At idle the P750ZM tends to be pretty close to the noise floor of my house (30dB), though on occasion even in lighter workloads like surfing the web the fans will kick on for a little bit and it will go up to 35-37 dB. For gaming or CPU intensive workloads, the system gets quite a bit louder; after a few minutes the fans settled in at 41.3 dB, which isn’t too bad. Maximum fan speed on the other hand gets pretty loud, reaching nearly 48 dB.

While we’ve tested notebooks that run a lot quieter – including the MSI GT72 and ASUS G751 – they also don’t have to deal with a full voltage desktop CPU. There’s a reason this sort of processor isn’t typically used in notebooks, and even in desktops it needs fairly potent cooling to run properly. That the P750ZM mostly runs the i7-4790K without problems is good news, and as we’ve shown already performance is certainly higher than any mobile CPU we’ve tested. If the extra 10-25% boost in performance (relative to mobile parts) is helpful, the P750ZM is definitely worth a look.

Clevo P750ZM LCD: 4K IGZO Clevo P750ZM: Potent DTR
Comments Locked

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    Correct I believe: AFAIK, NVIDIA requires a mobile chipset to enable Optimus. I don't think there's any technical reason why they couldn't do it on a desktop chipset, but then even if it was supported Clevo likely wouldn't have enabled this as it's a high-end notebook.
  • boeush - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    I must be going crazy... but why is it nobody asks or comments about availability of screens with a non-16x9 aspect ratio?? A machine claiming to be DESKTOP REPLACEMENT should be usable for more then movie watching. How the hell is one supposed to work on documents or do any serious coding where the VERTICAL real live state is far more valuable than horizontal? Where are 2560x1600 matte 17-18" screens??? Is nobody making them? Is there no demand - am I the only lunatic who dreams of them year after year as if they were some unachievable sci-fi fantasy?
  • boeush - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    *sigh* pardon the stupid typos brought to you courtesy of auto-incorrect on my smartphone... You get the gist though, I hope...
  • chlamchowder - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    The Surface Pro 3 has a 3:2 screen.
    Yeah, I don't get what's up with the "shortscreen" format. Maybe people just really like scrolling. I miss my first laptop, which had a 4:3 screen.
  • boeush - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    Unfortunately, Surface Pro 3 isn't what I'd call "desktop replacement". When it comes to the latter, for me at least, anything less than 17" is a joke. On DTR machines I expect a large high-res screen, and a full-size keyboard (not a reused one originally designed for a 15.6" form factor.) Man, I'd KILL for a 4:3 screen on a DTR laptop. But at least 16:10 is the minimum for me; that's where I draw the line. It's why I still haven't upgraded from my ancient DELL M6400: all the newer machines (even ones styled as "mobile workstations"!!) are hopelessly mired in the 16:9 nightmare...
  • Notmyusualid - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    ^ Kind of sums up the situation for me too.
  • kgh00007 - Tuesday, March 10, 2015 - link

    Nice review! Is there any chance you are going to ger in the 2015 Alienware 15 for review?
  • D2ultima - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    Glad to see a really nice review of one of these machines that reviews it for the capacity it's designed for, and not just complain about its size or aesthetics. Thanks very much for this Anandtech *gives thumbs up*
  • mrcaffeinex - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    Since they squeezed a desktop i7 (88W TDP) and a dedicated mobile GPU into one of these things, I am curious if it would be possible for someone to squeeze something like the AMD A10-7800 APU (65W TDP) into a notebook chassis. I would think it could be done, and at a price point that would make it appealing too. Any thoughts?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, March 11, 2015 - link

    It's possible to do it, sure, but the question is whether it's actually worth doing? If you just want a reasonably fast processor, Intel has plenty of mobile parts that can likely match the A10 desktop parts for performance while using less power.

    In single-threaded performance, any Core i5 mobile part can beat the A10-7850K. For multi-threaded workloads, the A10-7850K might be a bit faster than a Core i5-4330m, but if so not by much. So you have a higher power APU that will require better cooling and end up delivering less performance. Sure, Graphics is faster than the Intel GPU, but that's not saying much.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now