Transcend SSD370 (128GB, 256GB & 512GB) Review
by Kristian Vättö on January 27, 2015 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
- SSDs
- Transcend
- Silicon Motion
- SM2246EN
Final Words
From the performance perspective, the SSD370 is a very competitive value drive. It doesn't top the charts, but it provides a very good balance of consistency and peak performance. In most workloads, particularly our real-world testing, the SSD370 performs better than the MX100 and Ultra II, which have been my go-to value drives. Under very intensive workloads, the ARC 100 is slightly faster thanks to its great consistency, but most people who are looking for value drives won't have such harsh usage anyway.
The lack of DIPM support and the high slumber power consumption is a bit disappointing, though. Given how similar modern SSDs are in terms of performance, the power consumption really matters because additional battery life is easier to notice and more concrete than a few percent increase in performance. Obviously that doesn't apply to desktop users, but the majority of PCs are laptops now, so it just seems illogical to disable DIPM. Hopefully that's something Transcend can enable through a firmware update.
| NewEgg Price Comparison (1/23/2015) | ||||
| 120/128GB | 240/250/256GB | 480/500/512GB | 960GB/1TB | |
| Transcend SSD370 | $73 | $111 | $190 | $404 |
| Transcend SSD340 | $74 | $105 | - | - |
| Samsung SSD 850 EVO | $86 | $140 | $235 | $476 |
| Samsung SSD 850 Pro | $118 | $170 | $367 | $630 |
| SanDisk Extreme Pro | - | $150 | $260 | $508 |
| SanDisk Ultra II | $70 | $110 | $215 | $405 |
| Crucial MX100 | $70 | $109 | $214 | - |
| Plextor M6S | $76 | $130 | $270 | - |
| Intel SSD 730 | - | $160 | $318 | - |
| Intel SSD 530 | $80 | $128 | $240 | - |
| OCZ ARC 100 | $70 | $99 | $190 | - |
The pricing of the SSD370 is extremely competitive. It's practically undercutting the MX100 and Ultra II, which makes it one of the cheapest value drives on the market, and the SSD370 is also listed at even lower prices on Amazon Prime right now. Only the ARC 100 is cheaper, but on the other hand it also lacks support for low power states and doesn't come in 1TB capacity either.
I don't hand out the "Recommended by AnandTech" award very often, but I think it's justified in this case. It's not an overstatement to say that the SSD370 is overall the highest performing value drive and on top of that the pricing is very alluring. I would still, however, recommend the MX100 and Ultra II for users that are concerned about battery life because of SSD370's high idle power consumption. If Transcend SSD370 was able to fix that through a firmware update, it would be safe to say that the SSD370 would be the best value SSD on the market.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
44 Comments
View All Comments
Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
The MX100 and Crucial drives in general do well when they are empty, but once you have a dirty drive and mixed workload the performance suffers. Our 2015 Client SSD Suite will have a more thorough look at different performance metrics because I agree that the current suite, especially the random/sequential tests, don't show the whole picture.Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
The MX100 is only faster in synthetic Iometer tests when the drive has been secure erased. If you look at the Storage Benches, the SSD370 is faster in all except the Heavy Workload, where the MX100 is very marginally faster (not enough to really say it's faster).eddieobscurant - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
Great review, keep them coming.Just to let you know that there are some compatibility issues with amd chipset motherboards and this ssd.
http://www.amazon.de/product-reviews/B00K9HID1C/re...
Daniel Egger - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
Personally I'd rather have linked to the various English forums rather than amazon.de so most people here can understand what the problem is all about like:https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=183310.0
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answers/id-2361429/p...
http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php/...
I'm actually one of the couple who had problems with the SSD connected to my ASRock H87M Pro4 and after wasting almost two days trying to get it work I sent it back.
There's some speculation that the problem is caused by having 5V and 3.3V at the SATA Power connector as some PSUs and notebooks will supply it and can be resolved by using an adapter from a regular Molex connector instead. Of course I'm not able to refute or confirm that rumor.
However it does definitely not speak for Transcend for letting such a problem slip through nor does it speak for Anandtech not properly researching whether other users have problem with a product, especially when the review is done so late after the release...
Kristian Vättö - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
I didn't get samples until right before I left to CES, hence the late timing. Let's just say Transcend's marketing people aren't the easiest to work with when it comes to sampling...Daniel Egger - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Kristian, my beef is *NOT* the late review but rather that this delay should have brought you the possibility to check other peoples experiences.The two most important factors (yes, even more than speed) in SSDs are compatibility and reliability, the first one is definitely compromised and the jury is still out on the second.
With the still uninvestigated compatibility problem on the table there shouldn't have been any recommendation IMNSHO.
bfragged - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
I had slow speed and weird connection issues on all the SATA ports of my ASrock Z77 Extreme4-M while using a 512GB Trancend SSD370. Swapped it into a HP laptop and it worked fine. Very frustrating though, you would think they would test it on a wide range of systems. Looks like there are multiple motherboards that have problems with it. I saw it mentioned that it may be a compatibility issue with some SATA chipsets.Daniel Egger - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - link
Try using a Molex to SATA adapter rather than connecting it directly to the SATA connector of the PSU.hojnikb - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
>The SSD370 is available in capacities from 32GB to all the way to up to 1TB. I decided to leave out the 32GB and 64GB units from the specification table as I suspect these are mostly OEM-focused models because (to be honest) there isn't a significant retail market for drives smaller than 128GB anymore.Looks like these models are not OEM after all, as they can be found in lots of EU online shops
KAlmquist - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - link
Newegg sells the following sizes:64GB $60
128GB $80
256GB $105
512GB $202