MSI Z97 Gaming 5 Conclusion

A gaming based motherboard has to satisfy two main criteria. The first is the gaming aspect, by offering gaming oriented technology that people can use and feel comfortable using. The second is the experience, and making sure that users understand what is in their system and how it can be used to its full advantage without piling a multitude of jargon into the mix. The only other caveat to a gaming build is the price which ultimately dictates what extra features get added on and where in the product stack it sits.

MSI’s Z97 Gaming 5 sits above the Gaming 3 and below the Gaming 7/9 models, and thrown into that mix is the Z97M and Z97I Gaming models, some of which also come with 802.11ac WiFi. We have seen channel motherboards at $150 come with WiFi, but MSI takes that budget and invests in other features for the Gaming 5: A styled PCB and heatsinks, a Killer E2205 series network port, upgraded audio, an enhanced USB power for audio, six months of XSplit and a couple of in-the-box extras too. It is also nice to see M.2 support, with 22x42 to 22x80 sized devices supported. It seems odd that there is not a connection hole for 22x30 devices though.

The motherboard supports three-way PCIe 3.0 CrossfireX and two-way SLI, although if any PCIe device is used in the final slot then SLI is disabled due to the x8/x4/x4 arrangement. This is the compromise that motherboard manufacturers have to make compared to an x8/x8 with x4 from the chipset type of layout. Due to MSI’s layout, it also affords four separate PCIe 2.0 x1 slots for additional connectivity cards.

The Z97 Gaming 5 uses an aggressive form of MultiCore Turbo, meaning that the CPU benchmark results are all relatively high. This is combined with good scores in DPC Latency and idle power consumption. On the other side of the coin, audio results need an update to get the best results, the 14+ second POST times are longer than expected and USB speeds at the bottom of the charts.

When one is looking for a gaming based build, the aspirations are all at the high end. We are talking i7 processors with tons of memory and perhaps a couple of 980s thrown in for good measure, with super-fast SSDs and perhaps one or more high resolution, high refresh rate monitors. The reality for many is that gaming on a budget is a large part of the market. The Z97 Gaming 5 is middle of the road in terms of price point and feature set to appeal to the i3 or i5 gamers, perhaps enough to warrant a small bit of overclocking too. These builders might spend the biggest chunk of their budget on a GPU, a nice monitor or a large SSD, and do not tend to use other cards. While the Z97 Gaming 5 is not perfect for onboard audio and USB speeds, it does offer an interesting data point in this part of the spectrum.

For me, as a power user, I might have preferred another SATA cable or two in the box along with an Intel + Killer network port combination. MSI’s Z97 Gaming range unfortunately does not offer an Intel NIC at any point, which might be an oversight.

Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Timbrelaine - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    The many hundreds of dollars they would save?
  • fluxtatic - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    This. For gamers, X99 is an e-peen extender.
  • typographie - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    DDR4 is actually not a thing in the mainstream market. Probably won't be until Skylake's release, either. We don't need it anyway.
  • spidey81 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    There's also talk that initially there will be controller support for both DDR3 and DDR4. Not sure if it is legitimate. It seems unlikely considering it would be extra space on the die used.
  • fluxtatic - Tuesday, October 7, 2014 - link

    AMD did it a while back with Phenom II. When my M4A78 board died, I dropped the processor into an M5A97 EVO.

    That is, AMD might do simultaneous DDR3/DDR4, but I don't think it likely from Intel.
  • gw74 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    "We don't need it anyway" is presumably what you also said about DDR3 when DDR2 was coming to the end of its lifecycle.

    "No one will need more than 637k of memory for a personal computer"
  • casperes1996 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    He obviously meant as in "Right now we don't need it."
    Not that we'll never need it.

    Comparix X99 Haswell-E based systems with the likes of this just isn't fair, and you won't be able to put DDR3 into this.
    Nobody in this market needs DDR4 now anyway, n'or will they within the next few years.
  • gw74 - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    no he didn't obviously mean anything of the sort, because what do you mean by "need" anyway? just because you don't need the performance today, doesn't mean you shouldn't buy it now to future-proof your purchase.
  • just4U - Wednesday, October 8, 2014 - link

    Future proofing sounds good on paper but by the time you actually need to be on something faster chances are you've already moved on to new Hardware perhaps... even several generations on..
  • Nite Owl - Monday, August 24, 2015 - link

    No such thing as future proof. What he meant is he isn't dumb enough to squander that kind of cash for very little performance increase. In "real world" bench marking ddr4 doesn't do much. As long as you have good high quality ddr3 your fine. I've been building since 2001. Last years latest and greatest always lasts me at least 3 years, at least. My 2007 build lasted through 2013 with only upgrading the video card, once! Still ran max settings on every game I play. Blind consumers that jump on things for the sake of doing drive up the prices. Nice going, slick!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now