CPU Productivity

Our CPU productivity tests vary from pure CPU grunt (rendering, video conversion) to a variable workload based on common usage patterns that take into account memory speed and disk accesses. For consistency we run each CPU at its rated speed and the SSD is kept the same throughout.

SYSmark 2014 - Office Suite

SYSmark 2014 - Media Suite

SYSmark 2014 - Data Suite

SYSmark 2014 - Overall

Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench 11.5 - Single Threaded

Cinebench 11.5 - Multi-Threaded

x264 HD Benchmark - 1st pass - v3.03

x264 HD Benchmark - 2nd pass - v3.03

Sunspider 1.0.2

Webxprt

The Competition and The Test CPU Benchmarks
Comments Locked

126 Comments

View All Comments

  • kyuu - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    Yeah I was going to say something about that. The article text and the graphs are not in agreement.
  • kallogan - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    ground breaking new tech ! Wow !
  • Alexey291 - Thursday, April 10, 2014 - link

    wow
    such tech
    much ground breaking
    wow
  • evonitzer - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    In addition to what you are already planning to test, I would like to see some of the low end A4 or A6 APU's tested. They seem to be a blank spot for your reviews, making it tough to compare the cheap stuff against the previous generation. The A4's come with the same 2 CU GPU, but presumably better cpu performance, and are available pretty close to $50. Sure, they are higher TDP, but whatev.

    Anyway, interesting review. I'd be seriously tempted if I didn't just put together a cheap PC for my brother already. Maybe grandma can get a surprise upgrade ...
  • evonitzer - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    Oh hold on, there aren't any A4's or A6's available in Kaveri form, which means no GCN to be had for cheap. That's interesting. I wonder how much difference it makes on the low end. Well either way, the A4-6300 (and below) are still interesting to compare.
  • Glory2God - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    That Atom C2750 looks awesome in the multi threaded benchmarks.
  • rogueninja - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    AMD dualcore, quadcore, octacore, 100 cores. Who give a damn. They're as fast as a turtle.
  • Nintendo Maniac 64 - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    Would have been nice if there were more older CPUs to compare to, like Athlon 64 x2, first gen Phenom X4, and Conroe Core 2 Duo (rather than Wolfdale). It'd be even better if said older CPUs were around 2.0-2.5GHz as well
  • saiki4116 - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    Please add comparison with A4-4000(40 USD) and A4-6300,they could cost 10-20usd more than kabini.
  • BushLin - Wednesday, April 9, 2014 - link

    Anandtech, where's the power consumption figures? Just quoting the 25w TDP feeds assumptions such as the one I'm replying to.

    Why is it every time AMD have a CPU worth buying (doesn't happen that often) you guys manage to totally miss the point in the review? It's enough to make an objective person sound like a fanboy.

    I'll save you the trouble:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/athlon-5350-am...

    Although making the typical reviewer mistake of using a very high wattage PSU on a low power system, we can at least see something close to parity between an Athlon 5350 and a Celeron J1900 (the very same CPUs you reviewed).

    Makes quite a different outcome doesn't it?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now