Crysis 3

With Crysis 3, Crytek has gone back to trying to kill computers, taking back the “most punishing game” title in our benchmark suite. Only in a handful of setups can we even run Crysis 3 at its highest (Very High) settings, and the situation isn't too much better for entry-level GPUs at its lowest quality setting. In any case Crysis 1 was an excellent template for the kind of performance required to drive games for the next few years, and Crysis 3 looks to be much the same for 2013.

Crysis 3

All of these GPUs need to run at low quality settings to get decent frame rates, but Iris Pro is actually the first Intel integrated solution that can break 30 fps here. Only AMD's desktop Trinity can claim the same. NVIDIA holds a 30% advantage, one that shrinks to 10% on the GT 640. Given the only difference between those two parts is memory bandwidth, I wonder if Crystalwell might need to run at a higher frequency here.

Crysis 3

Crysis 3

Battlefield 3 Crysis Warhead
Comments Locked

177 Comments

View All Comments

  • whyso - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    They are completely different systems making power consumption values irrelevant.
  • codedivine - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    Hi folks. Can you post the OpenCL extensions supported? You can use something like "GPU Caps viewer" from Geeks3d.
  • tipoo - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    Interesting that the compute is punches above it's game performance weight. I wonder if they could put more EUs in a chip, maybe a larger eDRAM, and put it on a board as a compute card.
  • lmcd - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    They already have a compute card called Xeon Phi if I remember correctly.
  • Klimax - Sunday, June 2, 2013 - link

    Different Arch (X86 in Phi)
  • tipoo - Sunday, June 2, 2013 - link

    I'm aware, but the Xeon Phi requires completely different programming than a GPU like this which can just use OpenCL.
  • Soul_Master - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    What's your point for comparing desktop GPU with middle-range mobile GPU? CPU on both devices are not equal.
  • Soul_Master - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    Sorry. I misunderstood about i7 4950HQ process, a high-end quad-core processor for laptops.
  • Ryan Smith - Sunday, June 2, 2013 - link

    It's what we had available. We wanted to test a DDR3 version of GK107, and that's what was on-hand.
  • tipoo - Saturday, June 1, 2013 - link

    Hmm, so it's heavily hinted at that the next rMBP will ditch discreet graphics. The 5200 is good, but that would still be a regression in performance. Not the first time Apple would have done that, there was the Radeon cut out of the Mini, the 320M to the 3000, even the bottom rung of the newest iMac with the 640m. I wonder if it would at least be cheaper to make up for it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now