Conclusion

It was actually hard for me to finish this review on time. Every time I started working on it, I ended up gaming on the Edge. Every time, without fail. It’s a lot of fun to use. 

There’s a few things to think about with the Edge. It’s a real technical accomplishment, and as an engineer I can appreciate the challenges John Wilson and his design team must have encountered in creating a stable, polished mobile gaming device that packs this much power. And for a starting price of $999, this is actually a pretty good value for a system that holds a very unique position on the market. There’s nothing else quite like it on the market – you either have to give up the dedicated GPU or the tablet form factor. The relatively low resolution panel ensures that GPU performance won't be an issue, but long term these types of devices will need higher res panels and better GPUs to really be taken seriously.

Ultimately that's where the Edge finds itself today - stuck between the promise of a really cool future, and a decent but very specific present. The Edge is practically guaranteed to find a following in the enthusiast niche that is looking for a dedicated gaming tablet today, but its widespread appeal will be limited until the hardware has a chance to evolve. In this regard, Razer finds itself facing similar challenges to Microsoft with Surface Pro. We believe in the concept, but for broader appeal the hardware (and software) need more iterations (and more power efficient silicon).

The Edge hardware has some flaws – battery life, like with many (all) other Ivy Bridge tablets, is an Achilles heel, and the scarcity of ports is somewhere between annoying (no SD card slot) and ridiculous (no video out). And I seriously believe that devices like the Edge and Surface Pro absolutely should have Thunderbolt as a mandatory feature. But these are mere quibbles, things to improve in the next generation (Haswell starts to address many of the IVB’s idle power draw issues), not problems with the concept. Surprisingly, price isn’t one of the issues – the $999 base cost is actually a pretty good deal relative to the competition, considering the GPU horsepower on tap, and the upgrade costs are pretty reasonable, too. 

The accessories are kind of a double edged sword – on one hand, they’re awesome; on the other, they don’t come cheaply. The gamepad is obviously a must-buy, it’d be nice to have twice the battery life for any kind of mobile gaming, the HDMI dock is also necessary if you want any kind of video out, and pretty soon you’re talking about $420 in accessories before you even mention a keyboard or mouse of any kind. It’s not inexpensive, and it’s hard to think about buying more than one or two of the accessories without feeling your mental wallet run away and hide. The idea of paying $1499 for the 128GB Edge Pro and gamepad controller bundled together is fine and I suspect that to be the most popular combination, but when considering that the full kit sent to me rings in at a hair under $1900, it seems a little bit ridiculous. 

So in essence, the hardware is awesome, but it’ll cost you if you want to really unlock the full potential of the Edge. The impact it will have on mobile gaming going forward is going to be interesting – Razer has shifted the question from one of performance limitations to one of experience. The Edge has the computing power it needs to succeed as a gaming portable, and future generations will only get thinner, lighter, and more power efficient. The real difference maker here is the ability to take your PC games on the road and play them anywhere, not just where you can find a stable platform with space for a keyboard and mouse. I can go sit in a coffee shop and play any game I want exactly as I would on my M18x. It’s the same gaming experience you get on a regular PC, but completely untethered – from mice, keyboards, power cords, desks, convention, you name it. 

I’ve had portable gaming machines before – my interest in notebooks started with small 12-13” gaming notebooks and I still have an undying love for systems like the Clevo W110ER. But those are all small notebooks with big GPUs, offering nowhere close to the mobility or flexibility of the Edge. This, this is different. The Edge feels like a PC-iPad-PSP mashup from the future, and it's incredibly exciting. As much as it was hyped up with all the CES awards and social media marketing push, Razer has created a fascinating gaming machine that could change the way we view portable gaming going forward.

Display
Comments Locked

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • A5 - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    It seems like the 2nd generation of this will be way better, if what half of Intel is saying about Haswell and GT3e is true.
  • VivekGowri - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    That's something I wanted to touch on in the conclusion but ran out of time/forgot: GT3e will make the second generation of this really, really interesting. Haswell/GT3e is going to be an awesome combination, but like Anand tweeted, it'll be a while (14nm in 2015) until we get a real best of both worlds solution.
  • A5 - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    Yeah, it seems that way. Thanks for the reply.
  • tech.noob.fella - Friday, March 29, 2013 - link

    isnt gt3 only for desktops?? i thought gt2 was for portables like this machine...not sure though
  • Kristian Vättö - Friday, March 29, 2013 - link

    GT3 is for laptops too (and even the GT3e). Intel has always focused the best IGPs to mobile CPUs because those systems are the most likely to only feature integrated graphics. Desktops often have a dGPU because there's no heat/space/battery issue, especially if the system is geared towards something graphics intensive (IGPs, even lower-end ones, are fine for basic use).
  • TerdFerguson - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    I find this review to be overly generous. Hardware should be reviewed on its merits, not on whether or not you approve of the concept. Asking nearly $2k for this monstrosity is utterly unreasonable.
  • VivekGowri - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    It starts at $999, and the most reasonable configuration is $1499 - this honestly isn't that much more than Surface Pro or any of the other high-end Windows 8 tablets. I'd much, much rather pay $1499 for Edge Pro + gamepad than $1199 for the ATIV Smart PC Pro + laptop dock. Surface Pro plus Type Cover for $1139 is probably an equally decent value, but significantly slower (i5/HD4000/4GB vs i7/GT640MLE/8GB) and plays in a completely different market.
  • andrewaggb - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    The docks are still the killers for me. At a desk I want to run 2 monitors at 1080p each minimum, preferrably with both 1920x1200 or better. And a usb keyboard and mouse. I could have a dock setup like that at the work office and home office and just drop the tablet in wherever I'm at. Wouldn't care if the tablet screen was disabled when docked running 2 external displays.

    I would also like a transformer style keyboard dock so I could use it as a laptop.

    When I can do all that, with an i7/8gb/256gb+ ssd, it will be sweet. It sucks because I'm sure it could be done now and nobody seems to have done it. Hopefully with haswell... but everybody keeps talking about haswell like it's the second coming, I'm worried it's not going to live up to our expectations.
  • zanon - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    Vivek mentioned Tb, and what you describe is one of the few areas where it'd be really interesting. The dock could itself have a standard graphics card, and thus drive multiple large screens and more powerful gaming while still allowing the tablet part to get away with much less graphics power.
  • 15th Warlock - Thursday, March 28, 2013 - link

    I have to agree with Terd, while $999 may be the prize of entrance for the Edge experience, the review doesn't actually test the default battery configuration (regardless of it being the pro or non pro version).

    What this review shows us is a best scenario, using the $250 gamepad attachment and $70 extra battery, that's $320 over the original MSRP, so, even in this scenario you only get 2 hrs of gaming when not plugged to the wall.

    The review fails to mention that out of the box this tablet offers only one hour of gaming, and perhaps, less than 3 hrs. of regular use, if razer offered the extra battery with the gamepad attachment it would be a more tolerable proposal, but nickel and diming gamers for the privilege to play for two hrs is way too much, not even Apple limits the user experience in such a way with their overpriced toys...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now