Rightmark Audio Analyzer 6.2.5

In part due to reader requests, we are pleased to include Rightmark Audio Analyzer results in our benchmark suite.  The premise behind Rightmark:AA is to test the input and output of the audio system to determine noise levels, range, harmonic distortion, stereo crosstalk and so forth.  Rightmark:AA should indicate how well the sound system is built and isolated from electrical interference (either internally or externally).  For this test we connect the Line Out to the Line In using a short six inch 3.5mm to 3.5mm high-quality jack, turn the OS volume to 100%, and run the Rightmark default test suite at 48 kHz, 96 kHz and 192 kHz.  We look specifically at the Dynamic Range of the audio codec used on board, as well as the Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise.

RightMark Audio Analyzer: Dynamic Range

RightMark Audio Analyzer: THD + Noise

The Creative Sound Core3D chip in the Champion does a great job in our THD+N test across all frequency ranges, -75 dB(A) relating to a distortion of less than 0.02%.  The ALC898 in the Professional performs much like the other ALC898s in other motherboards.

It should be noted that we had to disable THX Studio Pro on the Champion to perform the tests, due to extreme cross channel leakage of the audio signals.

USB 3.0 Backup

For this benchmark, we run CrystalDiskMark to determine the ideal sequential read and write speeds for the USB port using our 240 GB OCZ Vertex3 SSD with a SATA 6 Gbps to USB 3.0 converter.  Then we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer.  The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are the videos used in the WinRAR test. 

USB 2.0 Sequential Read SpeedUSB 2.0 Sequential Write SpeedUSB 2.0 Copy Test

ASRock’s XFast software always gives them the best USB 2.0 scores in comparison to the rest of the spectrum.  Even without XFast though, the ASRock copy times are still very competitive.

USB 3.0 Sequential Read SpeedUSB 3.0 Sequential Write SpeedUSB 3.0 Copy Test

For both the Champion and the Professional, ASRock are using Texas Instruments USB 3.0 controllers (no native USB 3.0 on the X79 platform).  We normally do not come across these, but rather Etron or ASMedia.  It is clear to see why – the TI controllers are not the best performing, and are 60% slower than native USB 3.0 implementations in our copy test.  XFast is a saving grace, getting our copy tests back in the ball park.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing.  In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority.  Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests, such as audio, will be further down the line.  So if the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.  If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time, resulting in an empty audio buffer – this leads to characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks.  Having a bigger buffer and correctly implemented system drivers obviously helps in this regard.  The DPC latency checker measures how much time is processing DPCs from driver invocation – the lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes.  Results are measured in microseconds and taken as the peak latency while cycling through a series of short HD videos - under 500 microseconds usually gets the green light, but the lower the better.

DPC Latency Maximum

ASRock typically do rather well in our DPC Latency testing, and the X79 combo tested today are no different, coming in under 200 microseconds with ease. 

Test Setup, Power Consumption, POST Time Computation Benchmarks
Comments Locked

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • CeriseCogburn - Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - link

    Yes, which he is not.
    He is a soft skinned, supple handed, soft spoken, slow and controlled quite kind wuss-a-moe.
  • AssBall - Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - link

    WTF? Slow work day for you? Someone pee in your Cheerios? Can't find a better board to troll? Go do something useful like electrocute yourself with your vibrator.
  • jason_mcallister - Monday, February 11, 2013 - link

    I have the Z77 version of this motherboard. It's pretty solid. I didn't buy it for the marketing but for the 10 SATA ports. ASROCK does support this MB well, I recently got a BIOS update and the website support page has recent drivers updates for windows 8. Yes the board is gimmicky but so what if it has the major features I'm looking for. It's not a bad looking board either.
  • UltraTech79 - Monday, February 11, 2013 - link

    I can't believe this BS brand is still trying. Who the hell buys this crap? Do they realize that the whole fatal1ty horseshit is making people NOT want to buy an otherwise nice board? make it stop.
  • CeriseCogburn - Thursday, February 14, 2013 - link

    All the little insane amd fanboys bought the amd crap because a PR fantasy mind bending half naked ho was on the video card...

    The double D knockers fan was another recent amd sexual sales tool, for the tools.

    Don't expect most here to miss out being manipulated idiots, even if they caught on from the 1st post it was time to whine about fatal1ty like good little sheep.
  • Origin64 - Tuesday, February 12, 2013 - link

    quote: One would also expect some form of network interface to reduce CPU consumption / prioritize gaming traffic, but rather than going the Atheros Killer route, ASRock use Broadcom NICs and software.

    I wouldn't expect it. Those cards do not offer increased performance over any other networking solution, but they do cost 100 bucks more. It's a scam designed to target people who think more expensive means more better.
  • Solix - Tuesday, February 12, 2013 - link

    Please people, stop purchasing anything with this branding so:
    a) He can stop getting pointless cuts of the profits when as others point out he hasn't done anything particularly interesting
    b) They will stop making this crap and put out real enthusiast boards

    I'd like to actually purchase some of the upper end boards but I refuse to do based on marketing crap. If they want to brand it with someone I'd be more impressed with naming it after some awesome electrical engineer or circuit / cpu designer; heh.
  • lever_age - Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - link

    Hm, I think there are already a lot of "black edition" parts out there. Harold Black, inventer of the negative-feedback amplifier? heh.

    I don't know if you can count it as it's so far back and not really a branding, but Nvidia has some Tesla cards to sell you. And a lot of their code names are scientists of course.

    So for circuits, Jack Kilby (Nobel prize for first integrated circuit), Bob Widlar (IC design, but analog). Plenty of names escape me at the moment.

    For high-performance computing, let's start with Seymour Cray... wait a sec...
  • LoneWolf15 - Wednesday, February 13, 2013 - link

    For the Babality edition.
  • JonnyDough - Friday, February 15, 2013 - link

    Fatal1ty is one of the few gamers out there who isn't obese and smoke a lot of pot. LOL That's why he's made his millions.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now