MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 Review: Know Your Platform

3D Movement Algorithm Test

The algorithms in 3DPM employ both uniform random number generation or normal distribution random number generation, and vary in various amounts of trigonometric operations, conditional statements, generation and rejection, fused operations, etc. The benchmark runs through six algorithms for a specified number of particles and steps, and calculates the speed of each algorithm, then sums them all for a final score. This is an example of a real world situation that a computational scientist may find themselves in, rather than a pure synthetic benchmark. The benchmark is also parallel between particles simulated, and we test the single thread performance as well as the multi-threaded performance.

As mentioned earlier in the review, for whatever reason on this MSI motherboard and BIOS I could not verify that the maximum turbo bin was ever used. As a result, the single threaded performance on this board is lower than that of the other FM2 motherboards tested. (It should also be pointed out that the single threaded performance of the Phenom II X6-1100T trounces any Bulldozer derived silicon.)

Due to the floating point nature of the benchmark, every Bulldozer derived processor seems to perform badly against the competition. That being said, we can see a difference in the FM2 boards we have tested – and the MSI board comes at the bottom of the FM2 pile.

WinRAR x64 3.93 - link

With 64-bit WinRAR, we compress the set of files used in the USB speed tests. WinRAR x64 3.93 attempts to use multithreading when possible, and provides as a good test for when a system has variable threaded load. If a system has multiple speeds to invoke at different loading, the switching between those speeds will determine how well the system will do.

Despite the results of the previous tests, the MSI comes top of our WinRAR test.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2 - link

FastStone Image Viewer is a free piece of software I have been using for quite a few years now. It allows quick viewing of flat images, as well as resizing, changing color depth, adding simple text or simple filters. It also has a bulk image conversion tool, which we use here. The software currently operates only in single-thread mode, which should change in later versions of the software. For this test, we convert a series of 170 files, of various resolutions, dimensions and types (of a total size of 163MB), all to the .gif format of 640x480 dimensions.

To reinforce the problems relating to the Turbo mode implementation, the single-threaded FastStone benchmark on the MSI performs 3.9% slower than the fastest FM2 board.

Xilisoft Video Converter

With XVC, users can convert any type of normal video to any compatible format for smartphones, tablets and other devices. By default, it uses all available threads on the system, and in the presence of appropriate graphics cards, can utilize CUDA for NVIDIA GPUs as well as AMD APP for AMD GPUs. For this test, we use a set of 32 HD videos, each lasting 30 seconds, and convert them from 1080p to an iPod H.264 video format using just the CPU. The time taken to convert these videos gives us our result.

As Xilisoft uses integer operations for video conversion, our Piledriver based CPU can stretch its legs and try and use everything at its disposal. Despite this, the MSI board performs seven seconds slower than the ASRock motherboard.

x264 HD Benchmark

The x264 HD Benchmark uses a common HD encoding tool to process an HD MPEG2 source at 1280x720 at 3963 Kbps. This test represents a standardized result which can be compared across other reviews, and is dependant on both CPU power and memory speed. The benchmark performs a 2-pass encode, and the results shown are the average of each pass performed four times.