ASRock X79 Extreme11

To conclude, it is hard to judge a motherboard like the ASRock X79 Extreme11.  With no other major competing products offering similar functionality, ASRock can charge a pretty penny for the product.  However, does it still retain the usefulness or bang for buck in terms of performance?

For your $600 of green, the main selling point is the X79 platform mixed with two PLX PEX 8747 chips which allow four PCIe devices to be run at x16/x16/x16/x16 in PCIe 3.0 or up to seven devices to be run at x16/x8/x8/x8/x8/x8/x8 also in PCIe 3.0.  This combination leaves eight PCIe 3.0 lanes from the CPU, which are directed straight into an LSI SAS 2308 PCIe 3.0 RAID controller.  This LSI chip gives eight ports capable of SAS2/SATA 6 Gbps speeds, in RAID 0, 1 or 10 configurations.  An equivalent PCIe 3.0 card would set a user back several hundred as well as taking up a PCIe slot.

On top of the PLX and LSI chips, we also get a full-bodied X79 motherboard, featuring eight memory slots, dual Broadcom NIC capable of Teaming/Link Aggregation, a Creative Core3D sound chip, enhanced power delivery, and eight USB 3.0 ports via TI controllers.  Software comes in the XFast flavors, with XFast RAM taking advantage of the ability of X79 to hold more memory.  The board itself is also supports a multitude of Xeon processors, as well as ECC memory with the Xeons.  There is a good amount in the box too, such as six SATA cables and a USB 3.0 panel, but it should be noted that this internal bundle is similar to cheaper ASRock products.  The only thing missing in my opinion would be a WiFi connection on the IO, similar to that done by ECS.

Performance wise, the X79 Extreme11 does not win many accolades.  It performs similarly or worse than other X79 motherboards in the market - in our GPU testing, the board continuously came near the bottom.  The separation ASRock likes to make with the X79 Extreme11 is the PCIe functionality and the ability to include SAS drives on board - the speed of the extra ports reached a staggering 4.0 GBps, even though that may not be a realistic use scenario.  The extra ports also are a little hampered by not having additional cache to help with writing short transfer sizes like on a PCIe card.

With our testing, and the price range of this motherboard, it is safe to say that this product is more aimed at workstation projects, such as an 8-core Xeon with ECC, rather than a product for gamers or overclockers.  Tool it up with eight SAS drives, seven single slot GPUs, and away you go with a nice number crunching machine.  Instead of paying in terms of price for performance, we are all talking about price for functionality here.

As a technical exercise, what ASRock have done is pretty amazing.  In terms of pure innovation in a relatively stagnant market, I have to award the ASRock X79 Extreme11 a bronze award for pushing boundaries and enabling innovation in the motherboard market.  This motherboard, paired with a deep wallet, could be a number crunching machine for video or audio enthusiasts, or GPU crunchers who yearn PCIe bandwidth but also SAS compatibility.  This is strictly an enthusiast’s motherboard.

ASRock X79 Extreme11
AnandTech Editor’s Choice Bronze Award

Testing the LSI SAS 2308 PCIe Controller
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • AssBall - Tuesday, September 4, 2012 - link

    It is like buying an F350 Superduty Harly Davidson Ed. when a Honda Fit would haul all your stuff. But hey, more power to ya!
  • Taristin - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Almost 2013 and the board still says ATi Crossfire X? Hasn't AMD officially retired the ATi brand yet?
  • Grebuloner - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    This is bothering me as I started reading: You keep mentioning 70 lanes of PCIe with the two PLX chips+CPU leftover...divided into 64 for the x16's and "the other 8" for the LSI chip. 64+8=70? Why not just write 72 and end the confusion?
  • IanCutress - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Yes, simple math fail. A brain fart. Call it what you will, I made a mistake, and it should now be corrected. Though a simple email would be a lot more polite... :)

    Ian
  • Performance Fanboi - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Nope, you made a simple arithmetic or grammar error on the internet, LET THE LASHINGS COMMENCE!
  • Grebuloner - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Fair enough, my apologies, next time I shall email. Being a math teacher I get all riled up at math errors.
  • errorman1 - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Mr math teacher, not to be rude but just thought I'd pass this bit of scientific wisdom along.

    When people make errors they do so largely unconsciously, human beings DONT live in reality sadly, including you. What you understand or makes it to your conscious awareness is only a fraction of what is going on in your brain which by and large you don't control.

    Just remember the world doesn't operate on our expectations, morality and 'free will' it operates on cause and effect - the laws of nature. Everyone forgets this fact every day and it leads to great comedy!

    The human mind has limited resources with which to attempt to model the world and it's environment so we should expect errors and blunders as just a law of nature that in many instances people not as blesses in terms of well functioning complex of biological processes.

    http://bit.ly/dYaWUc
  • Death666Angel - Tuesday, September 4, 2012 - link

    I don't see posting the mistake in the comments as impolite. I have done so on a few occasions (typos, wrong calculations...) and did so because it was the fastest way for me to do that. Expecting me to fire up the email program or go to my online email, log in, copy your email adress, type up a formal email, all to appear polite to you while trying to help you is asking for a lot. :-)
  • mfenn - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    The comment in the article, "the LSI controller allows for RAID 0, 1 and 10 only, which is a little odd," struck me as a little odd.

    The LSI SAS 2308 is a lower-end chip based on their Fusion-MPT architecture, which has never had an onboard cache or parity (RAID5 and 6) support. Fusion-MPT chips, suitably rebranded of course, are typically used as the base option for SAS connectivity in enterprise-grade servers, with an option to upgrade to a more featureful RAID controller with onboard cache and parity support.
  • FunBunny2 - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    Real Men don't use RAID 5/6.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now