Investigating VM performance

The performance per VM can tell us much more. Even if our test is too CPU oriented, investing in more memory clearly pays off. ESXi is very efficient in allocating memory. There was for example 3GB of RAM ("Memory Shared Common") that was saved by Transparant Page Sharing.

throughput score per application

Nevertheless, the pressure on the memory system caused the SQL Server VM to crawl. Throughput plunged to one third. As a result the Zimbra VM benefited from the lower CPU usage of MS SQL 2008 and performance increased. This is another sign that our test is a bit too CPU oriented. But still, even this corner case scenario is telling us much, especially if we check out the latency numbers.

Latency per application

The latency impact was even worse. The MSSQL server response time was on average four times higher. Even more interesting is our LAMP site. Throughput remained the same, but response times were 3.5 times higher than with two tiles. The more spacious LRDIMM Supermicro server saw the response time double in the worst case.

Real World Virtualization Testing Energy Efficiency
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • dgingeri - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    "Most 2U servers are limited to 24 memory slots and as a result 384GB of RAM. With two nodes in a 2U server and 16 slots per node, you get cram up to 512GB of RDIMMs in one server. "

    It's not one server. It's actually 2 servers. just because they're in a 2U X 1/2 width form factor doesn't mean they're just one system. There are 2 systems there. Sure you can pack 512GB into 2U with 2 servers, but there are better ways.

    1. Dell makes a PowerEdge R620, where you can pack 384GB into 1U, two of those gives you the same number of systems in the same space, with 50% more memory.

    2. Dell also has their new R720, which is 2U and has a capacity of 768GB in a 2U form factor. Again, 50% more memory capacity in the same 2U. However, that's short 2 processor sockets.

    2. Now, there's the new R820. 4 sockets, 1.5TB of memory, 7 slots, in 2U of space. It's a beast. I have one of these on the way from Dell for my test lab.

    Working as an admin in a test lab, dealing with all brands of servers, my experiences with various brands gives me a rather unique insight. I have had very few problems with Dell server, despite having nearly 30% Dell servers. We've had 7 drives die (all Toshiba) and one faceplate LCD go out. Our HP boxes, at less than 10% of our lab, have had more failures. The IBMs, ahile also less than 10%, have had absolutely no hardware failures. Our Supermicros comprise about 25% of the lab, yet contribute >80% of the hardware problems, from motherboards that just quit recognizing memory to backplanes that quit recognizing drives. I'm not too happy with them.
  • JHBoricua - Monday, August 6, 2012 - link

    Dgingeri,

    Sure, you can load each of those Rxxx Dell servers with boatloads of memory, but you fail to mention that it comes with a significant performance/penalty. The moment you put a third Dimm on a memory channel your memory speeds drops from 1600 (IF you started with 1600 memory to begin with) to 1066 or worse, 800. On a virtualization host, that makes a big difference.
  • Casper42 - Friday, August 10, 2012 - link

    No one makes 32GB @ 1600 yet.
    So 512GB @ 2DPC would be 1333
    And 768GB @ 3DPC would be 1066 or 800 like you mentioned.

    384 using 16GB DIMMs would still be 3DPC and would drop from 1600 down to like 1066.

    256GB @ 1600 @ 2DPC still seems to be the sweet spot.

    BTW, why is the Dell R620 limited to 16GB DIMMs? The HP DL360p Gen8 is also 1U and supports 32GB LRDIMMs
  • ImSteevin - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    MMhmmm yeah
    Oh yeah ok
    I know some of these words.
  • thenew3 - Friday, August 3, 2012 - link

    The latest Dell R620's are 1U servers that can have two 8 core CPU's and 24 DIMM slots. Each slot can hold up to a 32GB DIMM giving total memory capacity of 768GB in a 1U space.

    We use these in our data centers for virtualization (we're 100% virtualized). Completely diskless (internal RAID 1 dual SD modules for ESXi)

    Each machine has four 10gb NIC plus two 1gb NIC. All storage on iSCSI SAN's through 10gb backbone.

    For most virtualization tasks, you really don't need the 2U R720, which has the same CPU/RAM options but gives you more drive bays and expansion slots.
  • shuntian8099 - Saturday, August 4, 2012 - link


    We accept any form of payment.

    http://commonprosperity.org/ )
    S=h=0=x ==sh0es=4oUSD
    J=0=r=d=a=n==sh0es=36USD
    A=i=r==M=a=x=sh0es=39USD
    C=0=a=c=h==b=a=g=36USD
    S=u=n=g=l=a=s=s=15USD
    simpletrading@hotmail.com
    Finally (48 hours) time limit to buy.

    LV Muffler $ 5.99
    LV Bags $ 19.9
    LV Wallet $ 6.55
    Armani Glasses $ 5.99
    LV Belt $ 6.9
    simpletrading@hotmail.com
    Buy addresses-
    commonprosperity.org
    ╭⌒╮
    ∴★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.█████.::∴★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.█田田█::
    commonprosperity.org ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮
    ∴★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.█田田█.∴★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.█田█田█∴★∵**☆.∴★∵*
    *☆.█田█田█.★∵**☆.∴★∵**☆.█████.*******************You
    r satisfaction is our eternal pursuit!
  • ddr3memory - Sunday, August 5, 2012 - link

    A few corrections - the 192GB for HCDIMMs is incorrect - it should also be 384GB.

    There is no data available that confirms a 20% higher power consumption for HCDIMMs over LRDIMMs. There is a suspicious lack of benchmarks available for LRDIMMs. It is possible that figure arises from a comparison of 1.5V HCDIMMs vs. 1.35V LRDIMMs (as were available at IBM/HP).

    It is incorrect that LRDIMMs are somehow standard and HCDIMMs are non-standard.

    In fact HCDIMMs are 100% compatible with DDR3 RDIMM JEDEC standard.

    It is the LRDIMMs which are a new standard and are NOT compatible with DDR3 RDIMMs - you cannot use them together.

    The 1600MHz HCDIMM mention is interesting - would be good to hear more on that.
  • ddr3memory - Sunday, August 5, 2012 - link

    I have posted an article on the performance comparison of HyperCloud HCDIMMs (RDIMM-compatible) vs. LRDIMMs (RDIMM non-compatible).

    Cannot post link here it seems - search for the article on the ddr3memory.wordpress.com blog:
    Awaiting 32GB HCDIMMs
  • ddr3memory - Monday, August 6, 2012 - link

    VMware has had good things to say about HCDIMM (not a word from VMware about LRDIMMs though). Search on the net for the article entitled:

    Memory for VMware virtualization servers
  • ddr3memory - Monday, August 6, 2012 - link

    The prices mentioned maybe off - I see IBM showing same retail prices for 16GB LRDIMMs/HCDIMMs and similar at the IBM resellers.

    These resellers show 16GB HCDIMMs selling at $431 at costcentral for example, $503 at glcomp and $424 at pcsuperstore.

    Search the internet for this article:

    What are IBM HCDIMMs and HP HDIMMs ?

    It has the links for the IBM/HP retail prices as well as the reseller prices.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now