NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Review Feat. EVGA: Bringing GK104 Down To $400

414 Comments

View All Comments

• CeriseCogburn - Friday, May 11, 2012 - link

  And let's add, since another amd fanboy has a big problem again - let's add, the great and "superior" amd Tahiti "gpu compute monster ! housefire !" gpu loses miserably in the compute benchmarks in this review, loses 3 tests to nVidia, to the gpu teh amd fanboys have spewed is very, very bad in compute compared to their loser amd 7970 core.
  
  Hey, how about that, now we both have some compute to talk about, and how amd is a loser failure, and nVidia won again, even in compute ! :)
  
  Wow, I guess compute is really, really, really important like all the amd fanboys have been saying this entire thread.

• CeriseCogburn - Friday, May 11, 2012 - link

  Here's the idiot spew from you about compute on the prior page, amd fanboy: " Anyway, 7970 is a superior product over 680 if only for the compute performance it offers."
  LOL
  It lost the benches here clueless.
  ROFL
  I love my amd fanboy friends.

• versesuvius - Saturday, May 12, 2012 - link

  Oh, you are back. Learned to read?
  
  Which benchmark are you talking about, know nothing imbecile? You are talking about this review? Are you trying to tell us that you cannot read or count? We already know that. Oh, you are trying to tell us that NVIDIA cannot get its act together even on the one benchmark that it has always done good, with 670 falling behind everyone? Hey, you are making progress. The NVIDIA way. Keep it up. You are doing fine.

• CeriseCogburn - Sunday, May 13, 2012 - link

  In this review nVidia won 3 compute benches and and won 2 compute benches.
  
  Nvidia 60%
  
  amd 40%
  
  Not like the very data here means anything to you.

• Nfarce - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link

  One of my SLI 570s crapped out last month. Knowing the 670 was on the horizon but not willing to wait, I grabbed a 680 for $520 (EVGA Superclocked 2682 model - the only one that I could grab with F5 tapping). Looking at how close the 670 is to the 680, and (as of right now) looking at all the stock of 670s on Egg, I overspent by $100 when I could have had the Superclocked 670. I had no idea the performance was going to be that close.
  
  And who would have thought these things would actually be available? Kicking myself...kicking myself...

• CeriseCogburn - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link

  At least you didn't spank out $579.99 plus tax and fees on the 7970 - which had a value drop off like rock from a cliff while official drivers were still absent.
  $130 plus tax and fees, crappy mismatched and total fail drivers, the usual strange and inexplicable crashing with ten fixes per incident any one of which may work "for a while" or with ones fingers crossed but you never know which one...
  Yeah dude, I'm not feeling sorry for you.

• Burticus - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link

  I like what I'm reading about the 670's performance and huge overclocking ability... but I'm sorry $400 is just too much for a video card for me. I am not the hardcore gamer I used to be, and sad to say I do a lot more on the console now than the PC. I mean when a card costs more than my car payment, that is just sad. For what? Bragging rights? 10 fps faster in Skyrim? Anything over 60 fps is pure gravy, people.
  
  Needs to get to $200 or less for this kid to get into the game. And I doubt 660 gets under that. I have a sneaky feeling they are going to make the 660 $299 and the 650 will be $199. Assuming a TI something doesn't pop up in the $250 range which probably will.
  
  My "old" GTX 460 768mb can limp along for a few more months. Heh, that has been a good little card and it was only $150.

• Nfarce - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link

  Well that's fine and dandy for you. But others have invested in 3 monitors and are running 5760x1080/1200 resolutions or one expensive one at a 2560x1440/1600. Older cards and especially sub-$400 cards just aren't going to run those kinds of resolutions with details up, which defeats the purpose of getting said monitors in the first place.
  
  PC gaming to play the latest and greatest maxed out never has been, nor will it ever be, cheap. I also am an avid console player (PS3). Dirt 3 and Crysis 2 on my PS3 and 55" LED looks like a PS2 game compared to it running DX11 on my PC with a 27" 2560x1440 LCD monitor and maxing out things with my 680.

• SlyNine - Sunday, May 13, 2012 - link

  I can get this 680GTX below 60FPS at 1080P. Op doesn't know what he's talking about.
  
  As far as console gaming. Its funny, you see screen shots and think that looks close. Than you actually play the games on both platforms and go, yea they look nothing alike.

• dunce - Thursday, May 10, 2012 - link

  I would like to see a 7970OC comparison? I was trying to find a 680 but gave up and got an 7970oc for $499 it's running at 1025Mhz and should be faster than a 680.