Biostar TA990FXE In The Box

In The Box

For a cheap board, we would expect a bare box with limited additions, reminiscent of what certain other manufactures may put in there.  But I was quite surprised:

IO Shield
Driver CD
User Manual
Six SATA cables (locking)
Two Crossfire bridges

The addition of Crossfire bridges is odd, as typically SLI bridges are given in boards (although the initial BIOSes of this board did not support SLI).  Also worthy of note is that the CPU back bracket on the board did not function with AMD all-in-one cooler.

Image courtesy of Newegg

Board Features

Biostar TA990FXE
Price Link to Newegg
Size ATX
CPU Interface AM3+
CPU Support AMD FX/Phenom II/Athlon II/Sempron
Chipset AMD 990FX
Base Clock Frequency Auto, 200 MHz to 600 MHz
Core Voltage Auto, 0.70 V to 1.55 V, Offset +0.50 V to +1.450 V
CPU Clock Multiplier Auto, x8 to x31.5
DRAM Voltage Auto, -0.25 V to +0.49 V
DRAM Command Rate Auto, 1T or 2T
Memory Slots Four DDR3 DIMM slots supporting up to 32 GB
Up to Dual Channel
Support for DDR3, 800-2000 MHz,
Expansion Slots 2 x PCIe Gen2 x16 (x16/x16)
1 x PCIe Gen2 x4
2 x PCI
Onboard SATA/RAID 5 x SATA 6 Gbps, Support for RAID 0, 1, 5, 10
Onboard 5 x SATA 6 Gbps (SB950)
3 x Fan Headers
1 x Front Panel Header
1 x S/PDIF Output Header
2 x USB 2.0 Headers
1 x USB 3.0 Headers
1 x IEEE1394 Header
1 x Serial Port Header
1 x CIR Header
Onboard LAN Atheros AR8151
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC892
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX connector
1 x 8-pin 12V connector
1 x 4-pin Molex connector
Fan Headers 1 x CPU Fan Header
2 x SYS Fan Headers
IO Panel 2 x Keyboard/Mouse PS2 Port
1 x Optical SPDIF Output
1 x Coaxial SPDIF Output
1 x Gigabit Ethernet
2 x USB 3.0
4 x USB 2.0
1 x eSATA 3 Gbps Port
1 x IEEE1394 Port
Audio Outputs
BIOS Version 29/02/2012
Warranty Period 3 Years from Manufacture date

As I mentioned in the TA990FXE overview, there are a few oddities.  The placement of the PCIe slots is questionable as it doesn't allow a gap between multi-GPU systems, and the inclusion of the Atheros network controller rather than a Realtek (for the combo discount) is odd.  The lack of fan headers is a concern.

Software

As we have never covered Biostar software before, it was worth my time to dig deep into what makes Biostar tick in this regard.  The myriad of software comes down a few key utilities - eHotLine, BIOS Update, TOverclocker and G.P.U.

eHotLine: This software seems to be part of Biostar's bug reporting.  Have an issue with your board, and this software pulls almost all the necessary info for you to send to them to help diagnose it.

BIOS Update: Does exactly what it says on the tin - even better if you are connected to the internet, as then it will search for the latest BIOS it can find from the Biostar servers, then download it and install.

TOverclocker: The main hub of software action takes place in TOverclocker.  On loading, it will apply any overclock previously set (even if it crashes your system), but offers information on the CPU, Motherboard and memory.  The OC Tweaker allows the user to change the base frequency and select the overclocking mode - the voltage options did not work on the Bulldozer processor.  H/W Monitor shows the voltages and temperatures, and even offers a CPU fan calibration tool.

G.P.U: The confusing part of the software is this - the Green Power Utility.  Why it was called GPU I have no idea, but this software takes a while to load and attempts to adapt the system to use less voltage.

Biostar TA990FXE – BIOS and Overclocking Test Setup, Temperatures and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • geforce912 - Thursday, April 5, 2012 - link

    Just so you know, the supremefx x-fi 2 on the crosshair v is still a realtek chip but with higher grade capacitors and a creative software overlay. Definitely not a creative chip. Please correct it.
  • TerdFerguson - Thursday, April 5, 2012 - link

    Instead of repeatedly calling $130 cheap for a motherboard, why don't you step up and breakdown the costs associated with construction?

    This reviewer is backwards, as usual - the other boards are horribly overpriced, following the modern trend.

    I'd like to see a cost breakdown for any of the very overpriced boards. Please show us how they justify their high costs. It looks to me like Biostar simply didn't get the price-fixing memo.

    It's insane how many folks are continuing to support AMD because of its former stance as a budget option and how many of those purported fans seem to turn up their nose at any components that aren't marketed (and priced) as being premium-tier.
  • MadAd - Friday, April 6, 2012 - link

    sata 3, cool
    usb 3, cool
    good overclocking, cool
    dual channel ram, itll do

    four graphics slots.....groan

    am fed up paying out the wazooo for these so called enthusiast boards when I only intend to run 1 graphics card ... yes im a gamer, i want the best in all other areas (esp best sata 3 perfomance) but jeez can we have some 'normal' boards reviewed along with these high end monsters pls?
  • gilmoreisu - Friday, April 6, 2012 - link

    I'm a little disappointed in not seeing the ASRock Fatal1ty board. Any reason why this was left off? Otherwise, great round-up. Thank you!
  • waldojim42 - Friday, April 6, 2012 - link

    One of the things I see skimmed over far too often these days are the actual audio capabilities. In the day of digital audio connections and receivers, why do we still have enthusiast level boards with stereo digital audio!? This is something That needs pointed out in the motherboard reviews. MSI makes such ridiculous claims, like "Lossless 24bit/192kHz HD Audio" and "THX TruStudio PRO", yet in the end mean NOTHING when you are playing a game, as you are still limited to 3(or 4) analog 3.5mm to RCA cables for your audio.

    So which boards support DTS/Dolby Digital encoding mid game?
  • funguseater - Friday, April 6, 2012 - link

    Thank you for taking the time to review these motherboards. It is a relief to know that my old Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P still overclocks to the same levels with a thuban (1090t). It will be interesting to see if the next 1090 chipset will support the old Thubans.

    I only have DDR2 on my board but it doesn't seem to affect performance as much as I thought it would so I can wait for the next gen boards.

    Anyway thanks for including the 1100t in the review!
  • ranger429 - Saturday, April 7, 2012 - link

    It would have been nice to see how a FX-4170 or 4100 would do in this test
  • brahma - Saturday, April 7, 2012 - link

    excelent job, congratulations! ,... but what a shame! do you forget the asrock 990fx fatality, the unique with a fase power 12+2 !!
    salutations.
  • Sunny129 - Saturday, April 7, 2012 - link

    Ian,

    First of all, thank you for the informative review and comparison of 990FX boards. Is there any particular reason you reviewed Gigabyte's GA-990FX-UD5, and not their big dog, the UD7? would it be worth while to review the UD7, since you seem to have reviewed the top 990FX boards from ASUS and MSI? specifically, i'd like to see if the UD7 suffers from the same downsides that the UD5 does, for instance the VRM heat issues while under load, lack of decent fan control, etc.

    thanks,
    Eric
  • kukreknecmi - Saturday, April 7, 2012 - link

    What does this mean? Doesnt video encode is Floating Point intensive task??

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now