NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Review: Retaking The Performance Crown
by Ryan Smith on March 22, 2012 9:00 AM ESTPortal 2
Portal 2 continues the long and proud tradition of Valve’s in-house Source engine. While Source continues to be a DX9 engine, Valve has continued to upgrade it over the years to improve its quality, and combined with their choice of style you’d have a hard time telling it’s over 7 years old at this point. Consequently Portal 2’s performance does get rather high on high-end cards, but we have ways of fixing that…
Portal 2 ends up being the strongest lead yet for the GTX 680, with the GTX 680 taking a 17% lead at 2560. What’s especially interesting though is performance in the bonus round with SSAA enabled – the GTX 680 takes a wholly unexpected and completely stunning 44% lead over the 7970. In fact it beats out everything here, including the GTX 590 and Radeon HD 6990. Meanwhile the lead over the GTX 580 is even more amazing, with the GTX 680 leading by 67% at these settings.
As it stands the GTX 680 is the first single-GPU card to do better than 60fps, and it does so in a landslide. All things considered, for a lack of memory bandwidth and ROP changes compared to Fermi GTX 680 does extremely well here.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
404 Comments
View All Comments
chizow - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
Did not see OC results listed anywhere, will they be added to this article or an addendum/supplement later?Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
It will be added to this article. We may also do a separate pipeline article, but everything will be added here for future reference.SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
Adaptive v-sync, is that like tripple buffering? never heard of it but it sounds interesting.iwod - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
In those high res test it seems it is seriously limited by bandwidth. If you could get 7Ghz GDDR5 or MemoryCube i guess it would have performed MUCH better.I think we finally got back to basic. What GPU is all about. Graphics. We have been spending too much time doing GPGPU which only benefits a VERY small percentage of the consumer market.
PeteRoy - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
Unfortunately there is no game that can benefit from the power this card has to give.We are in 2012 and the PC gaming graphic level is stuck in the year 2007 with Crysis as the last game to push the limits of video cards.
Since 2006 when the Playstation 3 and Xbox 360 took over the gaming industry all games are made for these consoles therefore all games have the graphic technology of DirectX 9.
Battlefield 3 in the end of 2011 still doesn't look as good as Crysis from 2007.
Sabresiberian - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
YOU have no use for this card because you are clearly playing Tetris at 1024x768. Other people have much higher resolutions and play much more demanding games.Some of them even - GASP! - run more than one monitor. Imagine that.
;)
CeriseCogburn - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
I agree. The 7970 isn't doing it for me @ 19x12 w SB@4800x4. MOAR.SlyNine - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
Crysis 2 will full DX11 plus texture pack tottaly tears my 5870 a new one. unless these cards are now pumping out 3x the FPS than the performance is needed.Ahnilated - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
I waited all this time hoping the GTX680's would be an awesome card to upgrade from my GTX480's that I run in SLI. Well I am very disappointed now. I guess I continue waiting.Pessimism - Thursday, March 22, 2012 - link
Do not forget that NVIDIA knowingly and willingly peddled defective chips to multiple large vendors. The real question is whether they have mastered the art of producing chips that will remain bonded to the product they are powering, and whether they will turn to slag once reaching normal operating temperatures.