Conclusion: Custom Job at a Custom Price

When we look at the Puget Systems Serenity SPCR Edition, we're really looking at two things: the design of the custom build, and the hardware configuration proper.

The hardware configuration is largely up to the end user; the quote on our price sheet listed our test system at a fairly onerous $2,149. We're really looking at a little over $1,000 in parts here judging from a trip to NewEgg and some quick and dirty math. No one likes seeing 100% markup on a computer that costs over two bills, so from a pure value perspective the Serenity SPCR Edition can feel like a real bust. None of the upgrades available on Puget Systems's site really gouge the end user (as opposed to, say, ordering RAM from Apple), so what we're really dealing with is a brutal base price. Bouncing over to the "Professional," which is designed to run at 20db instead of 11db (oh the horror!), drops the price by about $150. Even the "Mini," built in an Antec Mini P180, only drops the price another $100 on top of the "Professional." That's still pretty unseemly. And after all that, to only offer a one year warranty on parts versus the three years standard I've seen nearly everywhere else seems like adding insult to injury.

Update: After Jon at Puget Systems and Jarred both ran the numbers, they came up with a figure substantially higher than mine. While my rough and tumble estimate hits equivalent performance, it doesn't really account for all the extra materials Puget Systems does employ in this build. Jarred estimates markup at between 40% and 50% which is still a little rough, but nowhere near as bad.

On the other hand, the Serenity SPCR Edition isn't a slapdash job the way some other builds from boutique vendors can feel. The only other custom system I've seen that actually modified the case somewhat was AVADirect's Nano Gaming Cube, but that thing was more or less bursting at the seams and in dire need of a proper case instead of a modified one (something AVADirect has been working with SilverStone on). Puget Systems clearly thought the Serenity from the ground up, and there's some careful consideration going on here to ensure the quietest system. This is a smart design if ever I've seen one, and you can't argue with results: Puget Systems set out to build a silent computer and they've achieved it. The Serenity runs, under load, quieter than most laptops I've tested run at idle. We can't test the noise level because it basically sits beneath the noise floor of my apartment complex and I just don't have gear sensitive enough to pick it up.

Reconciling the high price (complete with middling warranty) with your desire for a silent machine is really going to be a matter of personal preference and just how much you're willing to spend for a quiet system. Puget Systems clearly gunned to get the Serenity as quiet as humanly possible (in fact our rep was disappointed they couldn't get it down to 10db), sparing virtually no expense, and on that front they're successful. You will, if nothing else, get quality parts if you order a Serenity from them (even the Serenity Mini uses a Seasonic power supply by default). Deciding just how much silent, efficient running is worth is going to vary from user to user, but at least Puget Systems is putting it on the table and offering a custom build that sacrifices flash for an austere, professional design.

Puget Systems' response to the Sandy Bridge chipset bug shows that they're willing to provide better support to end-users than most companies—something you usually only get from a boutique computer vendor. We appreciate what they offer, and if they could knock at least a couple hundred off the price and bump that parts warranty up to three years, we'd have Editor's Choice material on our hands. As it stands, though, I'm left reviewing another system that a lot of users (myself included) would be overjoyed to own but are unwilling to pay for.

Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

139 Comments

View All Comments

  • flemeister - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    "why did they pick a 850W PSU?"

    They didn't pick the CP-850 because of it's 850W rating, they picked it because it's the most suitable for the job:

    1) It's exceptionally quiet
    2) It's pretty cheap for the wattage on offer
    3) With no fan in the front of the HDD/PSU chamber for the sake of silence, the 120mm fan on the CP-850 provides cooling for hard drives in the lower drive cage
    4) Most important of all, the fan only ramps up from its minimum speed after reaching ~300W load (in a hotbox; ~400W if it's intaking cooler air, such as when installed in the lower chamber of the P183). With such low power consumption in this setup, the PSU fan will never ramp up. Even with Crossfired 5750's, max power consumption will have trouble going past 300W.
    5) What are the alternatives? Something else this quiet would cost a similar amount and be just as quiet or perhaps noisier. May as well use the CP-850.

    See the SPCR review of the unit for more details.
  • michal1980 - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    I read the spcr reviews. Bla bla bla. A smaller PSU, picked for the correct energy usage, is whats needed. This isn't engineering, this is over kill.

    There are fanless psu's outthere if you are going for ie from the spcr site itself

    Seasonic X-400. Game,set,match. No fan, will go up to 400watts. Whats Puget excuse?

    Oh you need a fan for the hd? waa waa, hook up another super low rpm fans on a control. Idleing, have them turn off.

    P.S.

    Whats the excuse for the subpar gaming perfomrance, that anandtech seems to be whitewashing over?
  • Anchen - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...

    Hey, which is cheaper? The antec 850, NOT the seasonic x-400. Game set match? The Seasonic x-400 is an awesome psu. It also costs a ton for 400w. Seems like a good excuse to me.
  • michal1980 - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    wow, the 850w psu is 7 dollars cheaper OMG, (850w= 119+12ship, 400w 129+6ship)

    This is a $2,000+ thats claiming to be designed for silence, and they cannot eat a ~$10 difference? Or just rise the price 10 bucks? And claim its even more silent?

    The point is to use the right tool for the job, just throwing something bigger at a problem is dumb engineering.
  • Sagrim - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    It'd come out to around an extra $20 if you include the extra fan that would be needed for the lower cage/psu area. Which, would require the fan to be upfront near the case (notice, ZERO intake fans are at the front) -- which would most likely up the dB slightly (even at low).

    Also, the x-400 would leave little wiggle room in terms of upgrading the gpu, and/or overclocking (notice, it was the K series).

    So, the Antec CP-850 provides the wind tunnel effect down below with it's "pass through" design, it's cheaper, it is stunningly quiet, and helps the overall airflow/cooling of the system.

    I fail to see the need for the x-400, even if the CP-850 is considered overkill.
  • Taft12 - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    There you go bringing ACTUAL engineering into a newbie's rant against "dumb engineering".

    We're trying to keep things dumb around here! You're ruining it!
  • michal1980 - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    I've been on anandtech for years before you joined. And years before I even regesitered.

    As an engineer, I see dumb engineering.

    smart engineering would be to go with a passive psu, that with a seperate fan. Dumb engineering to go bigger to solve the problem.
  • mino - Thursday, February 10, 2011 - link

    Go for a beer and come back when you manage to process Sagrim's post.

    Thank you.
  • kmmatney - Friday, February 11, 2011 - link

    Why would you want such as low-powered PSU? The 850W allows for upgrading components in the future - seems like a great choice.
  • michal1980 - Friday, February 11, 2011 - link

    because 400watts is more then enough for even a high power video card.

    Look back at anandtech gpu reviews.

    single 6970 tops out at ~360 watts.

    I love the more is better mentallity.

    A direct result of stupidty, and a direct cause of waste.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now