NVIDIA's GeForce GT 430: The Next HTPC King?
by Ryan Smith & Ganesh T S on October 11, 2010 9:00 AM ESTCrysis: Warhead
Kicking things off as always is Crysis: Warhead, still the toughest game in our benchmark suite. Even 2 years since the release of the original Crysis, “but can it run Crysis?” is still an important question.
Not surprisingly, we have to turn our settings way down even at 1280 to get a playable framerate. Unfortunately the GT 430 turns up near the bottom of the pile, losing by several frames per second to the 5570, and by even more to the 5670. The GT 430 won’t lose all games by this much, but this isn’t too far off. Compared to the other cards in its price bracket it’s underpowered.
Minimums are much the same. The gap closes, but the GT 430 can only best the GT 220.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
120 Comments
View All Comments
Ryan Smith - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
None of the good product shots I have include passive GT 430s. However there are 2 in the collage on an NV slide: a Sparkle and a Zotac.ranger203 - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
I have a Geforce G210 for my media center and it runs blu-rays well. I am looking for a little more umpppff to allow some post processing of other videos. But I paid $35 for my card, and the only way I would replace it was if this one was under $50.But.... a quick froogle search found they want to go for around $75. Giga-byte offers a passive cooler, looks pretty bad ass.
http://www.provantage.com/gigabyte-technology-gv-n...
Lolimaster - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
Just buy a HD5550. You shoul've started buying an AMD IGP Mobo, that's enough.Nvidia on the low end is just worthless.
DMisner - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
I noticed it has the same number of CUDA cores as the GT 240. Would this perform any better or about the same as the GT 240 for Folding@Home?AznBoi36 - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
It's slower than the GT240. Also the GT240 is a full height card, while this one is low profile. There is a reason why this card is called the GT430 and not a GT440.mczak - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
Hmm on page 1 it says roughly same die size as "Juniper GPU in the 5500/5600 families" - that should be redwood. Also, the "GT430 goes up against... GT430..." I guess that should be GT240?I'm really wondering how they attach 4 rops to two memory partitions btw. I believe that one quad rop per partition wouldn't really have required a lot of changes over one octo-rop per partition, but either the quad-rop block was split into 2 or it's actually attached to both MCs. Of course, for actual color fillrate, it doesn't really matter if there are 4 or 8 rops - pixel output is limited to 2 per SM anyway.
jsbiggs - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
Additional correction:On the Power, Temperature, and Noise page, the line "Even at these low wattages where our 1200W power supply isn’t very efficiency". Probably should be "...isn't very efficient". Cheers.
Onferno - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
Passively cooled and working as a PhysX card:http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews/1046/pg10/zo...
kmitty - Monday, October 11, 2010 - link
Depends on your definition of 'ultimate'. For me, just looking at it and seeing a fan meant it wasn't my ultimate HTPC card - absolute silence required!mcnabney - Tuesday, October 12, 2010 - link
No kidding.An ideal HTPC card is:
1. Silent
2. Consumes very little power
3. Can decode all current and pending video format/containers
4. Fits half-height as well
5. Has rock-solid driver support
6. Cheap
7. Bitstream audio and includes a full version of BluRay software to support it
This card just doesn't measure up. Ideally the best HTPC card isn't a card, but is actually part of the motherboard.