Full-On Gaming Machine: ASUS G73Jh

Our final recommendation in this roundup is for the best gaming machine you can get while still paying at least a sensible amount of money, and that machine is the ASUS G73Jh. We gave it our Editor's Choice award in our review, and it's pretty easy to see why.

For a second, let's ignore the meaty hardware built into the chassis and just appreciate the subtler, solid build of the G73. The stealth-bomber-inspired design seems unusual at first, but the notebook is virtually devoid of gloss, and is vastly more attractive than its predecessors. The old ASUS Republic of Gamers-branded notebooks were great in their own right, but the build of the G73 seals the deal.

Or is it the fact that our review machine came with a Core i7-720QM, 8GB of DDR3 (in four slots!), two 500GB 7200-RPM hard drives, a 2.1 speaker system with built-in subwoofer, and one of the fastest mobile GPUs on the market, the Mobility Radeon HD 5870? Stack all that with a high-contrast 1080p screen and a remarkably low $1505 price tag and you have both a bargain and a fantastic piece of hardware. If that price isn't low enough, ASUS sells a cut-down G73Jh-RBBX05 model at Best Buy that drops the screen resolution down to 1600x900, drops 2GB of RAM and one of the hard drives, but keeps the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 and Core i7-720QM...for $1199. Good luck even finding another machine sporting hardware that powerful for that price.

The ASUS G73 is big, powerful, quiet, and priced aggressively by a company hungry for market share, and it's our pick for the best full-on gaming machine you can buy without breaking the bank.

Gaming Notebook Runners Up: Alienware M17x and Clevo W880CU

If you're looking for alternatives, you can pick up laptops with Radeon HD 5870 CrossFire for around $2500 (with a few upgrades). Eurocom has a customized version of the Clevo X8100 with 5870 CrossFire (or you can get it with GTX 285M SLI), but the Alienware M17x looks better and packs some compelling features. Topping the list of nice extras is the WUXGA RGB LED display, a $200 upgrade that's worth every penny in our book. While we have little doubt the NVIDIA GTX 480M is going to be a faster GPU than the HD 5870, there aren't any SLI notebooks with 480M yet—and that's going to be difficult to manage, considering each GPU can draw 100 watts!

But there are advantages to single GPUs, like not having to worry about CrossFire/SLI profiles for your favorite game to come out. If you want GTX 480M, you can pick up the Clevo W880CU. One of the first companies to start shipping these bad boys is AVADirect, but it's not going to come cheap. If you must have the absolute fastest, most ridiculous piece of gaming kit, the W880CU aims to satisfy, available with the scorching 100-watt TDP GeForce GTX 480M. Given the lackluster lead the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 had on the GeForce GTX 285M, it's easy to expect the 480M to claim the crown of fastest mobile GPU available. You'll pay a pretty penny for it and the cooling required is going to be decidedly bulky, but if you must have the fastest, Clevo's W880CU will deliver. We're not sold on the design of the W880CU and we'll have a review in the near future, but the 480M is the fastest current single-GPU mobile solution.

Video/Multimedia Workstation Notebook and DTR Wrap Up
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • mnmr - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    FTA: "The 5850 is easily one of the fastest mobile GPUs available, and MSI makes great use of it with a high-resolution 1680x1050 screen.".

    Stop eating the manufacturers BS - that is not a high resolution display. FullHD (1920x1080) seems to be the "standard resolution" for 17" laptops, so anything less should be axed as "poor" rather than applauded.

    Even FullHD is not high-resolution in my book, as 1920x1200 displays were the standard for high-end notebooks as much as 5 years ago.

    Where's the laptop that has a true high-resolution display, like 2560x1600, or at least something beyond 1920x1200? Even the 18"+ laptops only have FullHD diplays. Truly sad that nobody pays attention to resolutions anymore :-(
  • Mezmorki - Tuesday, July 20, 2010 - link

    Sure, 1680x1050 isn't "high" resolution compared to the 1920x1200 of years gone by, but it's better than a lot of offerings today. I recently ordered a GX640, and one of the MAIN reasons why MSI was in the running is because they still offer 16:10 aspect ratio screens, although their next gen lappy's have switched to to 16:9 like everyone else.
  • Yasha613 - Thursday, July 22, 2010 - link

    That's the problem, it's like getting scraps and being told we should be thankful for the offering.

    Things have actually gotten worse than stagnation, it's gone backwards to promote a television standard that should be like that of buying a digital camera anymore. Does anyone purchase a digital camera that totes the wonders of being able to take photos at a max resolution of an TV or HDTV standard? No, of course not, in fact anything that can't do near twice that is scoffed at.

    Why and how did high-end laptops become the exception?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now