Testing with the Chroma ATE Programmable Load


Our test equipment consists of two Chroma programmable DC Loads that enable us to test power supplies with an output of up to 1500W. The biggest advantage of the Chroma DC Loads is simply the high precision it provides. It can measure differences as small as 0.001V and 0.0001A, which will provide us with best-in-class results.

When programming the Chroma with specific amounts of load calculated according to the ATX norm, we are able to load power supplies to an exact percentage. We can now show results at every specific percentage needed. To get the best overview of a power supply, we load each unit with 10%, 20%, 50%, 80%, 100%, and 110% of the specified output. This is easy to calculate for a 1000W power supply: the 10% load is 100W and 110% load is 1100W. Remember that this is the amount of power the PSU delivers; due to inefficiencies, a power supply will actually draw more power from the wall.

Note: If you would like to know more about our testing methodology, equipment, and environment, please read our PSU testing overview.

We have added an additional 10% on the highest load to see how the units perform with overload. This test will be performed in all future reviews. The overload test is performed at room temperature as well as under more stressful conditions; to ensure we are not too cruel to the power supplies, we will keep the ambient temperature at 50°C in the stress test. Experience shows that many units can stand the overload at room temperature but will experience problems with higher temperature and overload together. Only the best-built units will survive this.


The Testing Environment

There is one flaw in testing power supplies with programmable loads while trying to measure the sound pressure levels at the same time. Because the programmable loads get very loud, there is no chance to even hear the power supply on the test stand. In order to make accurate measurements of the noise levels we needed a way to separate the test unit and the programmable loads. Our solution was to build a very thick box around the unit.


We concluded that a five-layer box with a total thickness of 6" (15cm) containing two layers of wood and three layers of special foam would suffice. It is designed as a box within a box. The inner box does not touch any part of the outer box, making it difficult for acoustic noise to pass through in the form of vibration. Each box is isolated on both sides with a layer of heavy foam that is normally used to insulate engines. On the inside we have an additional layer of 4" (10cm) thick pyramidal foam on every side of the box to eliminate the acoustic waves coming from the test object as well as we can.


To ensure a completely closed system we installed the printed circuit board that the connectors of the power supply are attached to inside the anechoic room/box. In other box designs, you would need to put all the cables through the wall. Unfortunately, that would result in the inside of the box not being fully isolated anymore. Our design keeps everything that needs to be connected inside of the box and maintains isolation.

Internals DC Voltage Stability and Quality
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Powervano - Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - link

    Oh, my bad :-D Sorry Cristoph. But your new reviews are way better and I even think best of all :)
  • Powervano - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Thank you! :)
  • piroroadkill - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Sweet jesus, I did certainly not expect those graphs for the 3.3 and 5v lines, with even slight increases, and as for the 12v, well, it stays bang on target.

    Corsair, even though they've entered the market late, have seen issues with other PSUs and created the best PSUs in every segment - it seems they can do no wrong.

    Corsair, I salute you.
  • ineedaname - Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - link

    Don't forget that corsair PSU's are actually rebranded Seasonic PSU's
  • DrMrLordX - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - link

    Isn't the HX1000 a CWT unit?
  • Christoph Katzer - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - link

    Yes it is. Corsair buys from several companies...
  • Calin - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Assuming a 500W draw on the wall socket, a change from 85% to 86% efficiency, the power lost inside the power supply unit (as heat) changes from 75W to 70W. While this isn't an important figure by itself, this can make is run cooler or be a bit less noisy.
    If you take into account the power delivered to the internal components (not the one drawn from the wall socket), this improvement in efficiency is (a little bit) better than that: for a 500W internal load, you would use 588.2W from the wall with the 85% power source, and 581.4W for the 86% unit. While the total difference is small (7W or so), it is still there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now